Pay in installments of $32.53 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Sep 13 - Sep 18
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
6318-C3 FAGTechnische Basisdaten Hersteller: FAG Synonym: 0167242910030 ueres Breitenma: 43 mm Gewicht: 5300 Gramm Herstellungsland: Deutschland Zolltarifnummer: 8482 1090 Erweiterte technische Daten ueres Breitenmae: mm 190,00 Begrenzungsdrehzahl (n G) "4900. 0000" ueres Breitenmae: mm 43,00 ueres Breitenmae: mm 43,00 C3 Internal Clearance Larger Than Normal ECLASS number 23 05 08 01 ECLASS2 number 23 05 08 01 Einzelgewicht in (kg): 5. 3 Innenmae: mm 90,00
Technische Basisdaten
| Hersteller: FAG |
| Synonym: 0167242910030 |
| Äußeres Breitenmaß: 43 mm |
| Gewicht: 5300 Gramm |
| Herstellungsland: Deutschland |
| Zolltarifnummer: 8482 1090 |
Erweiterte technische Daten
| Äußeres Breitenmaße: mm 190,00 |
| Begrenzungsdrehzahl (n G) "4900.0000" |
| Äußeres Breitenmaße: mm 43,00 |
| Äußeres Breitenmaße: mm 43,00 |
| C3 Internal Clearance Larger Than Normal |
| ECLASS number 23-05-08-01 |
| ECLASS2 number 23-05-08-01 |
| Einzelgewicht in (kg): 5.3 |
| Innenmaße: mm 90,00 |
| Interne Radialluft C3 Innenluft (größer als Cn) |
| Radial Dynamic Load Rating Cr (N) 142000 |
| Radial Static Load Rating C0r (N) 102000 |
| Referenzdrehzahl (n ϑr) "5100.0000" |
| Spezialbehandlung Keine Spezialbehandlung |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.5 ★★★★★
Based on 24 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Sturdy and Bright!
Number of Items: 2
Sturdy and bright! Great for the driveway
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 18, 2026
★★★★★ 1
Extremely Overpriced
Number of Items: 4
It doesn’t hold charge too long , especially if it’s not on a perfectly bright sunny day without clouds. Even at that , It will only be able to light up for maybe two or three hours at best , and not very bright at all. Construction and materials are of good quality that’s why the one start or else zi would gave given a zero if i could. it is way overpriced for what it is. I am disappointed for what I paid and the amount of production I get from it. Would have returned it if I haven’t installed them and threw away the boxes.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 9, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Quality enclosure and battery. Looks great.
Number of Items: 4
Quality metal enclosure. Look great. Two color levels. Charge even in indirect sunlight just fine. I have now bought 12 of these lights.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 1, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Very durable and designed to last a long time
Number of Items: 2
I've had a pair of these lights for 7-8 years and would still be using them with no issues if a naughty racoon hadn't taken an interest in them and broken the glass on one of them. I was delighted to find that the identical looking ones (operate slightly differently) were still available.
They are extremely simple to put together (just screw together the durable metal pieces) and turn them on to the chosen brightness. It couldn't be much simpler.
I also have other Gama Sonic solar lights and they are every bit as good.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 4, 2024
★★★★★ 3
Gama lights
Number of Items: 4
3 out of 4 are great. One did not work right away. Company send 2 extra battery packs. But still one bad unit. Talking now about options. Company seems to have good customer service. But bad light definetly an issue. 1 of 4 bad.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 9, 2026