SKU: 19964115679

23144-BE-XL-K FAG

Sale price$634.42 Regular price$704.91
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $176.23 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 22 - Aug 27

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

23144-BE-XL-K FAGTechnische Basisdaten Hersteller: FAG Abdichtung: beidseitig Synonym: 0617464870000 23144 BE K Befestigungshlse: AH3144 Bezugsdrehzahl: 1. 080 1 min Gewicht: 49050 Gramm Grenzdrehzahl: 1. 860 1 min Herstellungsland: Deutschland Schmiernutueres Breitenma: 17,7 mm Zolltarifnummer: 8482 3000 Erweiterte technische Daten ueres Breitenmae: mm 370,00 BE Maximum Capacity Design Begrenzungsdrehzahl (n G) "1860. 0000" ueres Breitenmae: mm 120,00 ueres

Technische Basisdaten

Hersteller: FAG
Abdichtung: beidseitig
Synonym: 0617464870000 23144-BE-K
Befestigungshülse: AH3144
Bezugsdrehzahl: 1.080 1/min
Gewicht: 49050 Gramm
Grenzdrehzahl: 1.860 1/min
Herstellungsland: Deutschland
SchmiernutÄußeres Breitenmaß: 17,7 mm
Zolltarifnummer: 8482 3000


Erweiterte technische Daten

Äußeres Breitenmaße: mm 370,00
BE Maximum Capacity Design
Begrenzungsdrehzahl (n G) "1860.0000"
Äußeres Breitenmaße: mm 120,00
Äußeres Breitenmaße: mm 120,00
ECLASS number 23-05-09-11
ECLASS2 number 23-05-09-11
Einzelgewicht in (kg): 52.5
Innenmaße: mm 220,00
Interne Radialluft Cn Normale Innenluft
Radial Dynamic Load Rating Cr (N) 1860000
Radial Static Load Rating C0r (N) 2700000
Referenzdrehzahl (n ϑr) "1080.0000"
Schwingsiebausführung Keine Schwingsiebausführung
XL X-Life
AH3144 Befestigungshülse
Betriebstemperatur max.: 200 °C
Betriebstemperatur min.: -30 °C
C 0r 2.700.000 N Statische Tragzahl, radial
C r 1.860.000 N Dynamische Tragzahl, radial
C ur 223.000 N Ermüdungsgrenzbelastung, radial
Durchmesser Schmierkanal: 9,5 mm
Dynamische Tragzahl, radial: 1.860.000 N
Dynamischer Axiallastfaktor: 2,15
Dynamischer Axiallastfaktor: 3,2
Ermüdungsgrenzbelastung, radial: 223.000 N
Grenzwert für Fa/Fr für die Anwendbarkeit der versch. Werte der Faktoren X und Y: 0,31
Maximaler Durchmesser der Wellenschulter: 253 mm
Maximaler Freistichradius: 3 mm
Minimaler Anlagedurchmesser Wellenschulter: 237 mm
Minimaler Freiraum-Ø für Hülse: 233 mm
Minimaler Kantenabstand: 4 mm
Statische Tragzahl, radial: 2.700.000 N
Statischer Axiallastfaktor: 2,1
T max 200 °C Betriebstemperatur max.
T min -30 °C Betriebstemperatur min.
Y 0 2,1 Statischer Axiallastfaktor
Y 1 2,15 Dynamischer Axiallastfaktor
Y 2 3,2 Dynamischer Axiallastfaktor
d =a max 253 mm Maximaler Durchmesser der Wellenschulter
d =a min 237 mm Minimaler Anlagedurchmesser Wellenschulter
d =b min 233 mm Minimaler Freiraum-Ø für Hülse
d =s 9,5 mm Durchmesser Schmierkanal
e 0,31 Grenzwert für Fa/Fr für die Anwendbarkeit der versch. Werte der Faktoren X und Y
n G 1.860 1/min Grenzdrehzahl
n s 17,7 mm SchmiernutÄußeres Breitenmaße:
n ϑr 1.080 1/min Bezugsdrehzahl
r a max 3 mm Maximaler Freistichradius
r min 4 mm Minimaler Kantenabstand
≈m 49,05 kg Einzelgewicht
Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 19964115679

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.3 ★★★★★
Based on 13 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
C
Verified Purchase
CD
Phoenix, US
★★★★★ 1
Frame too short
Color: Beige, Size: 132in-Large Metal Base
Can’t be assemble due to the frame being too short
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 20, 2026
S
Verified Purchase
s davis
Louisville, US
★★★★★ 5
great room divider
This room divider is very nice, good fabric, blocks light, not entirely bit alot for my needs. covers or blocks what i dont want others to see, the assembly was some difficulty but he end product is fantastic.. i recommend fully.. thank you for a great product
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 25, 2024
P
Verified Purchase
Pamela S
Lexington, US
★★★★★ 4
Offers Complete Privacy
Color: Black, Size: 132in-Large Metal Base
We tried others that were nice but this particular room divider adds total privacy. We were looking for that. Easy to assemble. There is no gap if you position each petition close enough. The guality is very nice. Exactly what we were looking for.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 24, 2025
A
Amazon Customer
Lowell, US
★★★★★ 5
Versatile Room Divider With Easy Assembly and Strong Coverage
Size: 3 Panel 12FT W
I picked up this Siebwin 3-panel folding room divider mainly for privacy and room separation, and overall it works very well. Assembly is very straightforward, and the divider can be set up, taken apart, and stored without much effort. The fabric quality feels good, and the frame construction is stronger and more stable than expected. The support tubes especially feel well built and help keep the divider standing securely. One feature I really liked is the flexibility of the design. The panels can be used together as a complete divider or separated depending on the setup and available space. That makes it much more versatile for different room layouts or temporary privacy needs. The coverage is also very good, and the size matches the manufacturer’s description accurately. The fabric blocks light and background visibility well enough to provide solid privacy without feeling overly heavy. The wider feet also help improve stability compared to thinner folding dividers. Another positive detail is that everything arrived complete with no missing parts or damaged pieces, which made assembly much easier and faster. Compared to cheaper privacy screens, this one feels more durable and easier to customize depending on the situation. In terms of value for the money, it feels like a very practical and worthwhile purchase considering the size, flexibility, and build quality. Overall, a versatile and well-built room divider with easy assembly, strong privacy coverage, stable construction, complete included parts, flexible panel configuration, and excellent everyday functionality.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 27, 2026
F
Fred
Louisville, US
★★★★★ 5
Stable, flexible in deployment configuration, creates true privacy and looks great.
Size: 3 Panel 12FT W
This is the second room divider panel I have installed, and there are several features about this one that I like much better than my older one. The fact that there are no gaps and that the material is thicker means you get more privacy or more hiding power, if you wish. My older divider has vertical spaces between each of the panels and the panels are half as wide as the Siebwin panels, so there are many vertical spaces. The Siebwin divider really creates privacy. Another feature that I really appreciate is that the legs are wider and stand off from the floor. On my older one the legs are flat and they're rather awkward to adjust because they create more drag on the floor. The feet on the older one also loosen if you turn them counter clockwise, so adjustments of configuration that require the feet to be moved are more complex. The older divider also must be deployed in a zig-zag fashion because he feet are not as wide, but this new one can be deployed and stable in a straight, an "N" shape or an arc. They are both the same length, but because the older one must be use in a zig-zag deployment it doesn't reach to the length of the new one. The Siebwin divider definitely costs more at $103.48, but it sports several features and advantages over the other brand, so it does a better job and is worth the extra cost.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 25, 2026

recommand products