Pay in installments of $5.87 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Sep 6 - Sep 11
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
Eva Solo Legio Nova Tasse, Kaffeetasse, Teetasse, Kaffeeservice, Trinken, Servieren, Porzellan, Weiß, 400 ml, 887259Die Marke Eva Solo entstand 1997 und steht fr alltgliche Gebrauchsgegenstnde in exklusivem Design. Hauptkennzeichen sind Schlichtheit, klare Linien und ein hoher Gebrauchswert. Die Marke Eva Solo umfasst die Produktkategorien Cooking, Serving, Living und Outdoor. Im Gegensatz zur minimalistisch gestalteten Eva Trio Legio Serie wurde Legio Nova mit Rillen versehen, die einen eleganten Rahmen um die Speisen bilden. Ebenso wie das Legio Service besteht
Die Marke Eva Solo entstand 1997 und steht für alltägliche Gebrauchsgegenstände in exklusivem Design. Hauptkennzeichen sind Schlichtheit, klare Linien und ein hoher Gebrauchswert. Die Marke Eva Solo umfasst die Produktkategorien Cooking, Serving, Living und Outdoor.Im Gegensatz zur minimalistisch gestalteten Eva Trio Legio-Serie wurde Legio Nova mit Rillen versehen, die einen eleganten Rahmen um die Speisen bilden.
Ebenso wie das Legio-Service besteht auch Legio Nova aus hochwertigem Porzellan, das für Ofen, Mikrowelle und Tiefkühler geeignet ist. Es wurde von der dänischen Kochnationalmannschaft getestet und wird von ihr empfohlen.
• Hochwertiges Porzellanservice
• Geeignet für Spülmaschine, Tiefkühler, Ofen und Mikrowelle
Maße ohne Verpackung:
Länge: 12,5 cm
Breite: 9 cm
Höhe: 11 cm
Fassungsvermögen: 400 ml
Material: Porzellan
Farbe: Weiß
Hersteller-Artikelnummer: 887259
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.7 ★★★★★
Based on 24 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Change is not always better.
Love these. Smooth fabric and moist enough. Used to buy the regular ones. They changed the fabric to a rough texture. Pulls on the skin and not as efficient.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 3, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Did the job!
This worked really well...I use one pad for both eyes so these will last a while ...
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 26, 2026
★★★★★ 1
Awful product
These are terribly greasy, causing blurry vision. The first ingredient is mineral oil! Prior to ordering I searched the listing for the ingredients list and found nothing. I went to the product's website and still found nothing. I read reviews, which were mixed. I ordered them anyway, foolishly, and threw them in the trash.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 25, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Works on waterproof Mascara
These are great for removing all makeup even waterproof, leaves my eyes moisturized.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 20, 2026
★★★★★ 4
Gentle and effective
I've been using these pads a loooong time. They take off everything and are not irritating at all (my skin is super sensitive).
However they WILL leave an oily residue on your skin causing your makeup to spread around your face a bit. I don't mind this since I'd rather be over moisturized than dry. Nothing a little Cetaphil can't conquer post eye makeup removal.
I've since switched to Bioderma Crealine which lives up to all the hype. It takes ALL my makeup off without leaving any residue. I still use the EyeQ pads for heavy duty mascara and traveling since they are compact and cut down on the amount of stuff I need to carry.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on September 26, 2013