Pay in installments of $78.86 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Sep 9 - Sep 14
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
ZKLN5090-2Z-XL INATechnische Basisdaten Hersteller: INA Synonym: 0015371300000 ZKLN5090 2Z ueres Breitenmae: 0 mm oberes Abma Montage: nicht vorhanden Montagesbohrungen ueres Breitenma: 34 mm Gewicht: 918 Gramm Herstellungsland: Deutschland Kippsteifigkeit: 1. 000 Nm mrad Massentrgheitsmoment: 5,24 kg * cm Planlauf: 2,5 m Zolltarifnummer: 8482 1090 Erweiterte technische Daten 2Z Gap Seals At Both Sides Of The Bearing ueres Breitenmae: mm 90,00 Axial Dynamic Load Rating
Technische Basisdaten
| Hersteller: INA |
| Synonym: 0015371300000 ZKLN5090-2Z |
| Äußeres Breitenmaße: 0 mm oberes Abmaß |
| Montage: nicht vorhanden Montagesbohrungen |
| Äußeres Breitenmaß: 34 mm |
| Gewicht: 918 Gramm |
| Herstellungsland: Deutschland |
| Kippsteifigkeit: 1.000 Nm/mrad |
| Massenträgheitsmoment: 5,24 kg * cm² |
| Planlauf: 2,5 µm |
| Zolltarifnummer: 8482 1090 |
Erweiterte technische Daten
| 2Z Gap Seals At Both Sides Of The Bearing |
| Äußeres Breitenmaße: mm 90,00 |
| Axial Dynamic Load Rating Ca (N) 51000 |
| Axial Static Load Rating C0a (N) 126000 |
| Begrenzungsdrehzahl für SchmierstoffLubrikation: (n G Fett) "4200.0000" |
| Äußeres Breitenmaße:(B) mm 34,00 |
| Äußeres Breitenmaße:(b) mm 34,00 |
| ECLASS number 23-05-10-02 |
| ECLASS2 number 23-05-10-02 |
| Einzelgewicht in (kg): 0.88 |
| Innenmaße: mm 50,00 |
| Präzision P4 Präzision (Höher als P5) |
| XL X-Life |
| -0,01 mm Außendurchmesser unteres Abmaß |
| 0 mm Außendurchmesser oberes Abmaß |
| 2,5 µm Planlauf |
| AM50 Empfohlene INA-Präzisionsnutmutter axial klemmbar |
| Anziehdrehmoment für die empfohlene INA-Präzisionsnutmutter: 85 Nm |
| Außendurchmesser oberes Abmaß: 0 mm |
| Außendurchmesser unteres Abmaß: -0,01 mm |
| B 34 mm Äußeres Breitenmaße: |
| Betriebstemperatur max.: 120 °C |
| Betriebstemperatur min.: -30 °C |
| Äußeres Breitenmaß oberes Abmaß: 0 mm |
| C 0a 126.000 N statische Tragzahl, axial |
| C a 51.000 N dynamische Tragzahl, axial |
| C ua 7.700 N Ermüdungsgrenzbelastung, axial |
| Empfohlene INA-Präzisionsnutmutter axial klemmbar: AM50 |
| Empfohlene INA-Präzisionsnutmutter radial klemmbar: ZM50 |
| Ermüdungsgrenzbelastung, axial: 7.700 N |
| M A 85 Nm Anziehdrehmoment für die empfohlene INA-Präzisionsnutmutter |
| M m 5,24 kg*cm2 Massenträgheitsmoment |
| Mindestdurchmesser der Welle: 63 mm |
| Minimaler Kantenabstand: 0,3 mm |
| Minimaler Kantenabstand: 0,6 mm |
| Steifigkeit axial: 1.250 N/µm |
| T max 120 °C Betriebstemperatur max. |
| T min -30 °C Betriebstemperatur min. |
| ZM50 Empfohlene INA-Präzisionsnutmutter radial klemmbar |
| c aL 1.250 N/µm Steifigkeit axial |
| c kL 1.000 Nm/mrad Kippsteifigkeit |
| d =a min 63 mm Mindestdurchmesser der Welle |
| dynamische Tragzahl, axial: 51.000 N |
| n ϑ 3.000 1/min thermisch zulässige Drehzahl |
| r 1 min 0,6 mm Minimaler Kantenabstand |
| r min 0,3 mm Minimaler Kantenabstand |
| statische Tragzahl, axial: 126.000 N |
| thermisch zulässige Drehzahl: 3.000 1/min |
| ≈m 0,918 kg Einzelgewicht |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.6 ★★★★★
Based on 19 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Comfortable
Size: Medium, Color: Blue
So comfortable! They stay up perfectly love love love
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 7, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Great!
Size: Small, Color: (001) Black / Black / White
Perfect socks! They wash nicely, not too thick, and are super comfortable! They run true to size and are a great quality!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 10, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Perfect fit
Size: Large, Color: (100) White / White / Black
Durable and comfortable. Size works well. Very soft with nice thickness for training. Fairly long lasting
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 12, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Post-COVID Sock Hunt: Finally a Win
Size: Medium, Color: (001) Black / Black / White
Ever since COVID, I haven’t been able to find a pair of socks that hold up for more than a few months. Brands like UA, Adidas, and others seem to have cut corners—likely in response to inflation—by downgrading materials and labor rather than raising prices. The result? Socks that wear thin, rip easily, or lose shape fast.
These, however, have been a pleasant surprise. I’ve been wearing them for a few weeks and so far, they’re holding strong. You can tell some cost-saving measures were still made—certain areas feel slightly thinner—but overall, the construction is solid.
A key win: they stay on. These are ankle socks (not “no-shows”), and they hug the ankle securely. That’s a huge plus in a world where most post-COVID no-shows slide off halfway through the day.
We may never get back to the pre-COVID quality standards without paying a premium, but for now, these are a reliable choice.
Ratings:
• No slipping: 10/10
• Price: 7/10
• Durability (so far): No pilling or loose threads — promising start.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 24, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Great Quality and Stylish
Size: Large, Color: (001) Black / Black / White
Exactly what I was looking for. I don’t like socks that are no-show that your ankles rub on the shoe. These are taller than that but shorter than socks that go up and over the ankle. They’re comfortable, good quality, and pretty thick. They’re form fitting m, but not compression. I dint like compression socks, and these are tight, but not too tight.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 5, 2025