Pay in installments of $21.64 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 17 - Jul 22
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
PCJT60-XL-N INATechnische Basisdaten Hersteller: INA Synonym: 0096438420000 PCJT60 N I Gewicht: 3140 Gramm Innendurchmesser: 60 mm Schutzkappe: KASK12 Erweiterte technische Daten ueres Breitenmae: mm 238,00 ueres Breitenmae:(B) mm 73,60 ECLASS number 23 05 16 02 ECLASS2 number 23 05 16 02 Einzelgewicht in (kg): 3. 25 I Inch Size Grease Nipple R 1 8 Innenmae: mm 60,00 N Cast Iron Housing With Undercut Slot For End Caps Radial Dynamic Load Rating Cr (N) 56000 Radial
Technische Basisdaten
| Hersteller: INA |
| Synonym: 0096438420000 PCJT60-N-I |
| Gewicht: 3140 Gramm |
| Innendurchmesser: 60 mm |
| Schutzkappe: KASK12 |
Erweiterte technische Daten
| Äußeres Breitenmaße: mm 238,00 |
| Äußeres Breitenmaße:(B) mm 73,60 |
| ECLASS number 23-05-16-02 |
| ECLASS2 number 23-05-16-02 |
| Einzelgewicht in (kg): 3.25 |
| I Inch Size Grease Nipple R 1/8” |
| Innenmaße: mm 60,00 |
| N Cast Iron Housing With Undercut Slot For End Caps |
| Radial Dynamic Load Rating Cr (N) 56000 |
| Radial Static Load Rating C0r (N) 36000 |
| Spezialbehandlung Keine Spezialbehandlung |
| XL X-Life |
| Abstand Montagesbohrungen: 202 mm |
| Anschlußgewinde Lubrikation: M6 |
| Anzahl Anschraubbohrungen: 2 |
| Dynamische Tragzahl, radial: 56.000 N |
| Ermüdungsgrenzbelastung, radial: 1.870 N |
| Gesamthöhe Einheit: 73,6 mm |
| Statische Tragzahl, radial: 36.000 N |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.4 ★★★★★
Based on 29 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Perfect mini sticks
Flavor Name: Zero Sugar Beef, Size: 6oz (Pack of 12), Flavor Name: Zero Sugar Beef, Size: 6oz (Pack of 12)
Such a great snack size for my little one that he can actually finish! These taste great and easy to throw in a bag on the run. He loves the taste and I love the protein. Win, win!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 20, 2026
★★★★★ 5
good taste with no added sugar
Flavor Name: Zero Sugar Beef, Size: 6oz (Pack of 12)
MrBeast Links has zero added sugar and still manages to stay moist with a really good flavor, which is impressive. I wouldn’t have expected it to maintain that texture without some kind of sugar infusion, but Jack Link's really got it right. It’s especially a great option if you’re trying to cut a few carbs out of your diet.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 4, 2026
★★★★★ 4
It’s Fine
Flavor Name: Zero Sugar Beef, Size: 6oz (Pack of 12)
I was excited for low sugar. They made up for it in salt. Way too salty. Inconsistent quality from one stick to the next. Not a bad product. Not for me.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 5, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Yummy!
Flavor Name: Zero Sugar Beef, Size: 6oz (Pack of 12)
Tender and delicious
No sugar with alotta flavor
Have ordered these several times and they make a great protein rich keto friendly snack
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 16, 2026
★★★★★ 3
Slimy! Taste okay, but strange texture
Flavor Name: Zero Sugar Beef, Size: 6oz (Pack of 12), Flavor Name: Zero Sugar Beef, Size: 6oz (Pack of 12)
I really wanted to like these but they're really slimy! I've had Jack Links before but these are even more slimy. I normally get chomps or archer beef sticks. I would say these have the texture of the archer beef stick just a bit more slimy. Not my favorite.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 10, 2026