Pay in installments of $7.00 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Sep 4 - Sep 9
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
Mannheim Riding Gloves DB/AB 7,5What catches the eye first when you look at the Roeckl Sports unisex riding glove MANNHEIM, is the backhand made from high quality Fantasia Melange. The material not only thrills with its complex look but ensures due to its stretchy quality and breathability that the glove fits like a second skin and dries quickly. Speaking of fit: The well thought out slip on construction makes it much easier to take off the glove. Roeckl Sports used soft and grippy
What catches the eye first when you look at the Roeckl Sports unisex riding glove MANNHEIM, is the backhand made from high-quality Fantasia Melange. The material not only thrills with its complex look but ensures due to its stretchy quality and breathability that the glove fits like a second skin and dries quickly. Speaking of fit: The well thought-out slip-on construction makes it much easier to take off the glove. Roeckl Sports used soft and grippy PU-material on the palm for a safe and reliable grip on the reins and therefore precise and sensitive aids. All of this makes the MANNHEIM the perfect trendy leisure riding glove which is at its best for activities at the stables and on horseback in the summer. And a glove that features a cool design with a distinctive Roeckl Sports logo extending from the color-contrasted ring finger to the backhand. Clever and also stylish: The printed Roeckl Sports hand logo on the thumb of the straight, closed fist as a visual cue to check that you hold the reins correctly with your thumb on top at any time. Does not contain leather.Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.0 ★★★★★
Based on 16 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Good paper towels.
At the time of my review this set of 16 double layered paper towels are going for about $18.99. Not a bad price for a namebrand paper towel.
I usually use Great Value paper towels because they are not only inexpensive but have good absorbency so it was interesting to compare it to the Scott namebrand, whom I use just about exclusively for my toilet tissue.
The papertowels worked well as I expected them to but I did not specifically see a dramatic difference between it and the ones I usually used. The only noticeable differences to me were:
- Scott paper towels had a prettier pattern
- Scott paper towels visually had a much more tidy design and *looked* higher quality
- Scott paper towels felt softer to the touch
As for absorbency though? I felt like they performed identically. And trust me, we burn through paper towels. We have two small children and still have to wash bottles daily. So, we try to balance cost versus efficacy for papertowels because we use them so much every day.
For the what they are these are great, but I will probably stick to the other brand unless I'm in a pinch and need to order papertowels more conveniently OR if these ever go on sale or have a coupon. I don't need my papertowels to look or feel pretty (the sloppy floral print and more coarse feel of the GV ones work for us right now because they are used exclusively for clean up), I need them to absorb and pick up gunk well.
Would I still recommend these, though? Absolutely. Maybe appearance and texture are more important to you for a paper towels. We aren't there yet with our littles. Lol.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 11, 2026
★★★★★ 1
Junk
Just pay for the better ones, these are cheap junk. They can’t even be torn off without falling apart.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 30, 2026
★★★★★ 5
MY DOG LOVES IT
Size: 20.0"L x 20.0"W x 6.0''TH, Style: Round, Pattern Name: Bed
MY CHIHUAHUA WON'T GET OUT OF THIS BED! she loves it! from the first moment we brought it in and put it on the floor. she gently scratches at the sides and cuddles in with her blankey and likes she's not there. ohhh... great value for the price! nice size, big enough for both of my chihuahuas to lay in comfortably. soft, but very sturdy sides, the bottom is fluffy, padded very well. the outside bottom, there is a non stick covering so the bed doesn't scootch around on tile floor, it stays put.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 28, 2026
★★★★★ 5
It's lasted
Size: 20.0"L x 20.0"W x 6.0''TH, Style: Round, Pattern Name: Bed
I've had this bed for 5 years and it is still in great shape. Washes up in the washing machine just fine. My littlest dog absolutely loves it and is lost when our other bigger dog steals it. She barely fits in it but she loves it too. Ha! Good quality at a good price. Couldn't ask for more.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 27, 2026
★★★★★ 5
My Puppy Loves It.
Size: 20.0"L x 20.0"W x 6.0''TH, Style: Round, Pattern Name: Bed
I didn't know what to expect when I saw this advertised, but some reviews said that their puppy had chewed on it and it was still holding up with no holes. So, I decided to get it and see for myself. I have to say that my puppy loves it and chews on it and it is holding up very well. No holes yet and I suspect after all her chewing and no holes, there won't be any. Nice size for a 25 pound dog and smaller. Well built and nice looking bed. It has enough padding to make it soft for my puppy. I got it big enough, so she can grow into it, too. Well satisfied and I do recommend it.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 18, 2026