SKU: 60734803486

Carbotech Brake Pads for Lotus Exige 2006-2013 Low Dust High Performance Track Autocross Street

Sale price$135.90 Regular price$151.00
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $37.75 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 24 - Aug 29

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

Carbotech Brake Pads for Lotus Exige 2006-2013 Low Dust High Performance Track Autocross StreetVehicle Compatibility: CT109L 2006 2013 Exige 2006 2013 Exige S CTCP7600D46 2006 2009 Exige Sport Cup AP Racing Caliper CTCP7635 2006 2013 Exige S w AP Racing Front Caliper 2008 2013 Exige S240 2010 2013 Exige Sport Cup CT491L 2006 2013 Exige 2006 2013 Exige S 2006 2013 Exige Sport Cup 2008 2013 Exige S240 Carbotech Brake Pads Engineered for Every Driving Need Discover Carbotech's diverse range of high performance brake pads, tailored for specific

Vehicle Compatibility:

    CT109L
    2006-2013 - Exige
  • 2006-2013 - Exige S
  • CTCP7600D46
    2006-2009 - Exige Sport Cup AP Racing Caliper
  • CTCP7635
    2006-2013 - Exige S w/AP Racing Front Caliper
  • 2008-2013 - Exige S240
  • 2010-2013 - Exige Sport Cup
    CT491L
    2006-2013 - Exige
  • 2006-2013 - Exige S
  • 2006-2013 - Exige Sport Cup
  • 2008-2013 - Exige S240

Carbotech™ Brake Pads – Engineered for Every Driving Need

Discover Carbotech™'s diverse range of high-performance brake pads, tailored for specific driving conditions, from daily street use to intense racing applications.

  • 1521™ – Street Performance: Carbotech™ 1521™ is the ultimate street compound, designed for smooth modulation, low dust, and minimal noise. With operating temperatures from ambient up to 800°F (426°C), the 1521™ offers reliable braking power for all street, tow, and fleet vehicles. Not for track use.
  • AX6™ – Autocross Optimized: The AX6™ is crafted for autocross enthusiasts, delivering high torque and consistent performance across 50°F to 1000°F (10°C to 537°C). With a strong initial bite and responsive modulation, this pad is perfect for autocross but not for street use.
  • RP2™ – Endurance Racing: For endurance racing, the RP2™ delivers a powerful initial bite with great fade resistance from 250°F to 1450°F (121°C to 787°C), making it a reliable choice for extended track sessions. Not for street use.
  • XP Series – Championship-Proven Racing Pads:
    • XP8™: The XP8™ is an entry-level racing compound with high torque and fade resistance from 200°F to 1250°F (93°C to 676°C), designed for track days with smooth modulation and excellent rotor friendliness. Not for street use.
    • XP10™: Known for powering champions, the XP10™ offers an intense initial bite and high fade resistance up to 1475°F (801°C), ideal for competitive racing. Not for street use.
    • XP12™: With added torque and fade resistance up to 1850°F (1010°C), the XP12™ is aggressive yet rotor-friendly, offering unmatched control on the track. Not for street use.
    • XP20™: The XP20™ features an aggressive bite and linear torque curve, handling temperatures up to 2000°F (1093°C) for top-tier track performance. Not for street use.
    • XP24™: The pinnacle of Carbotech™'s racing lineup, XP24™ delivers maximum torque and the highest fade resistance from 400°F to 2000°F (204°C to 1093°C), perfect for professional endurance racing. Not for street use.

Whether you're looking for a low-dust street pad or a high-performance racing compound, Carbotech™ offers the perfect solution. Note: Only the 1521™ is suitable for street use.

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 60734803486

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.7 ★★★★★
Based on 5 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
A
Verified Purchase
AA
Houston, US
★★★★★ 3
Mineral sunscreen stick review - poor at blending
I’m writing a review for this product as well as a number of other mineral sunscreen sticks (MSS) after testing a bunch of them—scroll down to point #6 below if you want to know which one I thought was the best. I’ve placed this exact review on every single other MSS I used. I specifically elected to go with mineral-based sunscreens—lots of talk on the environmental effects of the other sunscreens (not sure how much of this is actually true, but I’m willing to avoid the non-mineral sunscreens given the minimal investment on my part). Here are a few important points about this review: 1. No one paid me to write this review. I put down my own $140 to get all 13 of these MSSs. I just wanted to find the best one by limiting as much bias as possible. Yes, my wife definitely gave me the you’re-crazy-but-I-guess-I’m-stuck-now look. 2. Quick sunscreen tutorial. Most dermatologists say we should try to get an SPF of 30+. Each 1% of zinc counts for 1.6 SPF, so to hit SPF 30, your zinc has to be 18.75%+. Each 1% of titanium counts for 2.6 SPF, so a combination of zinc and titanium could get you to SPF 30 as well. Titanium apparently isn’t good enough to block UV-A (cancer causing and photo-aging) light on its own, so you must add zinc to it. I calculated the SPF based on the stated zinc and titanium percentages on the label and these calculations were usually different from the quoted SPFs (they might be adding more SPFs from other ingredients, but I can’t say for sure). Nine of the 13 MSSs had calculated SPFs 30+. Only 4 of the 13 had a calculated SPF greater than or equal to the label SPF. 3. Because I can’t judge cancer prevention or aging blockade in the short term, avoiding burns and eye irritation are the most important immediately observable elements of an MSS. Every MSS I tested did equally well in burn avoidance and eye irritation avoidance. 4. It should be noted that I’m not Caucasian, I’m South Asian. If you don’t know what that is exactly, Wikipedia it or watch some Russell Peters standup comedy (his old stuff, not his new stuff). My skin color is probably similar to that of Benjamin Bratt (mind you, we’re talking about his skin color only… I’m not even in the same galaxy of overall looks as he is, much to my wife’s chagrin). The ability of a white-colored MSS to blend is crucial for me. And yes, even brown people like me need sunscreen. It would absolutely suck for me as a South Asian to have a higher risk of heart disease, diabetes, and hypertension, skillfully dodge those bullets with diet and exercise and luck, only to get taken out by skin cancer. 5. I like most scents. It seems like so many things are going unscented now—an MSS that is truly unscented is okay, but a lot of things labeled “unscented,” actually have an odd, unpleasant (sort of like bad oatmeal) smell to them. The scent score is logged as a “3” if it’s truly unscented, a “5” if it has a great scent, and a “1” if it smells bad. 6. Here’s the final conclusion. Only 3 of the 13 MSSs I tested had the following combination of characteristics: calculated SPF 30+, smell score 3+, and blend score 4+. These top three were: Neutrogena Sheer Zinc, Aveeno Positively Mineral, and Blue Lizard. When you factor in cost, it’s a no-brainer—Neutrogena and Aveeno were only half the cost of Blue Lizard. Therefore, my two winners (tied for first place) are Neutrogena Sheer Zinc and Aveeno Positively Mineral. Honorable mention for Blue Lizard—twice as expensive as the others, but might be slightly easier to maneuver on your face given the smaller size stick (this is a stretch compliment for Blue Lizard—I think NSZ and APM are just better). Hope this helps you select your next mineral sunscreen stick! A^2
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on July 12, 2020
M
Verified Purchase
Maria Eugenia vivas alba
Whiting, US
★★★★★ 5
Muy práctico
Este protector solar es muy bueno es orgánico y a pesar q es pequeño rinde mucho y protege mucho es muy práctico usarlo en barra
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 24, 2026
A
Verified Purchase
Angela C
San Leandro, US
★★★★★ 5
Perfect for the melanin-less crowd!
Style: SPF 15, Size: 8 Fl Oz (Pack of 1)
This is my go to brand. I’m pasty white and burn easily, but not with this! It’s long lasting and smells great too!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 5, 2026
B
Verified Purchase
benjamin bannister
Draper, US
★★★★★ 5
Good For Faster Tanning
Style: SPF 15, Size: 8 Fl Oz (Pack of 1)
This is a terrific sunscreen for those looking to tan faster. It's not as low as 8 SPF, or as high as the minimum recommended 30 SPF, but it'll get you darker faster. Apply this 15 minutes before going in the sun, and reapply every two hours. As someone who recently went to Hawaii and got 2-3 hours of sun every other day for two weeks, reapplying is absolutely crucial. We went once and reapplied after three hours, and that gave us some pain. Not as much pain as not reapplying at all, but it definitely taught us to reapply no matter what, if you are in the sun. Overall, this applied cleanly and protected our skin about 93%. And 93% is better than not wearing any sunscreen at all.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on September 8, 2025
M
Verified Purchase
Marjorie E. Wood
Port Orchard, US
★★★★★ 5
Hawaiian Tropic for this Florida girl!
Style: SPF 15, Size: 8 Fl Oz (Pack of 1)
Hawaiian Tropic Sunscreen has been my go-to for lotions and sunscreens for over 50 years! I love the fragrance, plus the offerings of oils, lotions and sprays. Purchasing from Amazon always guarantees fast deliveries and the best prices.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 29, 2026

recommand products