Pay in installments of $92.27 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 31 - Sep 5
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
9629DGY-2 - Double Reclining Love SeatDesigned with stylistic versatility and comfort in mind, the Laconia Collections addition to your homes casual living room provides a comfortable gathering spot for your family and friends. The reclining ends of the love seat are engaged with a pull of the side mounted tab. The transitional frame of the love seat is covered in 100 percent top grain leather where the body touches, with faux leather covering the remaining areas, its dark gray hue
Designed with stylistic versatility and comfort in mind, the Laconia Collection’s addition to your home’s casual living room provides a comfortable gathering spot for your family and friends. The reclining ends of the love seat are engaged with a pull of the side mounted tab. The transitional frame of the love seat is covered in 100 percent top grain leather where the body touches, with faux leather covering the remaining areas, its dark gray hue complementing your home’s décor.
Features
- Solid wood and plywood frame with metal reinforced seat
- High-density foam padding over pocket coils
- 100% Top grain leather where the body touches, all else faux leather
- Attached back and seat cushions
- Tab pull reclining motion
- Removable seat back
- Weight capacity: 300lbs per seat
Specifications
Specifications Details
Overall Dimensions
62.5 x 37.5 x 40.5H
Length
63.75"
Width
30"
Height
27.5"
Net Weight
149.25 lbs
Gross Weight
165.75 lbs
Country of Origin
Malaysia
Cubic Feet
30.4362
Pieces per Carton
1
Seat Width
41.5"
Seat Depth
20.5"
Seat Height
19.5"
Arm height
23.5"
Fully reclined length
64.5"
Fully reclined height
33"
Required back clearance to recline
2.5"
Doorway width
23.5"
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.1 ★★★★★
Based on 28 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 4
Nice shirt!
Fit Type: Regular Fit, Color: White, Size: X-Large
I added one of these shirts to another order just to see if they were any good. I was pleasantly surprised by the quality. It fits perfectly and looks pretty nice for a low cost casual dress shirt. Materials seem decent quality. Comfortable, soft fabric. Didn’t shrink too much in the washer and dryer. We’ll see how it holds up long term but so far so good
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 12, 2025
★★★★★ 5
My new favorite shirts!
Fit Type: Regular Fit, Color: Grey, Size: Large
These are my new favorite shirts! I just ordered a 3rd. i wish there were more colors. Yes, the cotton is heavy-weight and I like that. They are just a bit warmer than regular dress shirts. The fit is excellent. I'm 5'9", 200lbs and L fits perfectly. Enough room without being blousy. The sleeves are long enough (finally!). (Most other 16.5/32-33 shirts always have sleeves that are too short). The fit/finish and detail is surprisingly good. They don't really shrink after washing and come out very soft. Not wrinkle-free, but that's ok since it means that the 100% cotton hasn't been dosed with chemicals. I expect they will wear very well over time.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 5, 2025
★★★★★ 5
A perfect white work shirt.
Fit Type: Regular Fit, Color: White, Size: Medium
Thick, durable, iron exquisitely and the fit is spot on. Perfect white work shirt. I have a grey shirt too, the quality is the same.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 4, 2026
★★★★★ 3
Right fit
I love this shirt it was nice and bright when I got it after a few wash it started to fade out a bit was a perfect fit for a medium built person 5’7 I still would recommend this product they are really nice and thick
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on September 14, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Quality shirt. Not too blousy.
I'm 5'11" and hover around 175-180 lbs. so I'm a pretty average guy. I've been thin my whole life but now I'm in my 40's so if I don't watch it, my stomach will get bigger. I bought this shirt in slim-fit first. It was perfect but since these shirts are 100% cotton, I was concerned that after a couple washings, it would be too small (especially in the stomach area). I returned the slim-fit and bought this regular-fit (medium).
For this review, I thought it would be helpful to compare the Amazon Essentials shirt to The Gap's regular oxford shirt.
I've always liked the fit of Gap oxford shirts. Upon inspection, the weight and feel of the Amazon oxford cloth is exactly the same at the Gap's.
I laid one of my old Gap shirts on top of this Amazon Essentials oxford. You can see from the pictures that the torso cut is exactly the same (about 21 inches pit-to-pit seam). I like that. I'm not a fat guy and I don't want a blousy shirt. This is neither too blousy nor too slim. Just right. The sleeves are perhaps 1/2 inch longer than the Gap shirt. Perhaps one negative is the tail. The Amazon Essentials tail is 1.5-2" longer than the Gap shirt. This makes the Amazon Essentials shirt a touch long for wearing untucked in my opinion. However, if you do tuck, a longer shirt stays tucked-in. So it depends how you want to wear it. I have a lady who does alterations. She'll charge $10 to shorten the tail if I wanted that. If I do have the Amazon shirt altered, it would still be a bargain. These are good quality shirts with a nice cut to them. I won't hesitate to buy them again. Highly recommended.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 24, 2020