Pay in installments of $11850.00 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 26 - Aug 31
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
Belden 1855A Sub Miniature Video Coax 23 AWG 1000 ft VioletSub Miniature Video Coax Cable 23 AWG 1000 ft For Composite through SDI Transmissions 36 lb Max Pull Tension 75 Ohm Impedance Choose from 10 Colors The Belden 1855A Sub Miniature Video Coax 23 AWG 1000 ft Violet is a precision broadcast video cable for analog and digital signals. It can be used for narrow band composite through wide band SDI transmissions. Stranding is solid and the conductor is bare copper. Insulation material is gas injected foam
- Sub Miniature Video Coax Cable
- 23 AWG / 1000 ft
- For Composite through SDI Transmissions
- 36 lb Max Pull Tension
- 75 Ohm Impedance
- Choose from 10 Colors
The Belden 1855A Sub Miniature Video Coax 23 AWG 1000 ft Violet is a precision broadcast video cable for analog and digital signals. It can be used for narrow-band composite through wide-band SDI transmissions.
Stranding is solid and the conductor is bare copper. Insulation material is gas-injected foam high density polyethylene and the outer shield is of two layers, with layer 1 made of aluminum foil-polyester tape-aluminum foil and featuring 100% coverage and layer 2 made of tinned copper with 95% coverage.
Max pull tension is at 36 lbs and bend radius at 1.5". Impedance is 75 Ohm and overall diameter .159". Ten different colors are available to choose from, with black exclusively offering outdoor and aerial suitability.
-
- Precision broadcast video cable for analog and digital signals
- For narrow-band composite through wide-band SDI transmissions
- 10 colors can be chosen from, with black good for outdoor / aerial use
UPC: 612825356837
In the Box
Belden 1855A Sub Miniature Video Coax 23 AWG 1000 ft Violet
- 10-Year Warranty
| AWG | # coax: 1 AWG: 23 Stranding: solid Conductor: BC - bare copper Diameter: .023" (.06 cm) |
| Insulation | Material: gas-injected FHDPE - foam high density polyethylene Diameter: .102" (.26 cm) |
| Outer Shield | Layer 1: Outer shield trade name: Duofoil Type: tape Material: aluminum foil-polyester tape-aluminum foil Coverage: 100% Layer 2: Type: braid Material: TC - tinned copper Coverage: 95% |
| Outer Jacket | Material: PVC - polyvinyl chloride |
| Max. Recommended Pulling Tension | 36 lbs (16.3 kg) |
| Min. Bend Radius | (Install)/Minor Axis: 1.5" (3.8 cm) |
| Compliance | NEC/(UL) specification: CMR CEC/C(UL) specification: CMG EU CE mark: yes EU directive 2000/53/EC (ELV): yes EU directive 2002/95/EC (RoHS): yes EU RoHS compliance date: 01/01/2004 EU directive 2002/96/EC (WEEE): yes EU directive 2003/11/EC (BFR): yes CA prop 65 (CJ for wire and cable): yes MII order #39 (China RoHS): yes RG type: sub-miniature 59/U |
| Flame Test | UL flame test: UL1666 vertical shaft |
| Suitability | Indoor: yes Outdoor: (yes - black only) Aerial: (yes - black only, when supported by a messenger wire) |
| Plenum/Non-Plenum | Non-plenum |
| Impedance | 75 Ohm (tested in accordance with ASTM D-4566 paragraph 43.2, option 2 using a 75 Ohm fixed bridge and termination) |
| Inductance | (�H/ft): .107 |
| Capacitance | (pF/ft): 16.3 |
| Velocity of Propagation | 82% |
| Delay | (ns/ft): 1.22 |
| Conductor DC Resistance | DCR @ 68°F (20�C) (Ohm/1000 ft (304.8 m)): 20.1 |
| Outer Shield | DCR @ 68°F (20�C) (Ohm/1000 ft (304.8 m)): 7.6 |
| Attenuation | Freq. (MHz): 1.000 = attenuation (dB/100 ft (30.48 m)) .390 Freq. (MHz): 3.580 = attenuation (dB/100 ft (30.48 m)) .780 Freq. (MHz): 5.000 = attenuation (dB/100 ft (30.48 m)) .920 Freq. (MHz): 6.000 = attenuation (dB/100 ft (30.48 m)) 1.000 Freq. (MHz): 7.000 = attenuation (dB/100 ft (30.48 m)) 1.080 Freq. (MHz): 10.000 = attenuation (dB/100 ft (30.48 m)) 1.200 Freq. (MHz): 12.000 = attenuation (dB/100 ft (30.48 m)) 1.300 Freq. (MHz): 25.000 = attenuation (dB/100 ft (30.48 m)) 1.800 Freq. (MHz): 67.500 = attenuation (dB/100 ft (30.48 m)) 2.830 Freq. (MHz): 71.500 = attenuation (dB/100 ft (30.48 m)) 3.060 Freq. (MHz): 88.500 = attenuation (dB/100 ft (30.48 m)) 3.160 Freq. (MHz): 100.000 = attenuation (dB/100 ft (30.48 m)) 3.330 Freq. (MHz): 135.000 = attenuation (dB/100 ft (30.48 m)) 3.810 Freq. (MHz): 143.000 = attenuation (dB/100 ft (30.48 m)) 3.920 Freq. (MHz): 180.000 = attenuation (dB/100 ft (30.48 m)) 4.380 Freq. (MHz): 270.000 = attenuation (dB/100 ft (30.48 m)) 5.400 Freq. (MHz): 540.000 = attenuation (dB/100 ft (30.48 m)) 7.700 Freq. (MHz): 720.000 = attenuation (dB/100 ft (30.48 m)) 9.470 Freq. (MHz): 750.000 = attenuation (dB/100 ft (30.48 m)) 9.590 Freq. (MHz): 1000.000 = attenuation (dB/100 ft (30.48 m)) 10.500 Freq. (MHz): 1500.000 = attenuation (dB/100 ft (30.48 m)) 13.000 Freq. (MHz): 2000.000 = attenuation (dB/100 ft (30.48 m)) 15.100 Freq. (MHz): 2250.000 = attenuation (dB/100 ft (30.48 m)) 16.000 Freq. (MHz): 3000.000 = attenuation (dB/100 ft (30.48 m)) 18.500 Freq. (MHz): 4500.000 = attenuation (dB/100 ft (30.48 m)) 22.800 |
| Minimum Return Loss | Start freq. (MHz) 5: Stop freq. (MHz) = 1600 Min. RL (dB) = 23 Start freq. (MHz) 1601: Stop freq. (MHz) = 4500 Min. RL (dB) = 21 (Return loss tested in accordance with ASTM D-4566 paragraph 45.3 using a 75 Ohm fixed bridge and termination) |
| Sweep Testing | 100% sweep tested 5 MHz to 4.5 GHz |
| Operating Voltage | Max. - UL: 300 V RMS |
| Operating Temperature | -22 to 167�F (-30 to 75�C) |
| UL Temperature Rating | 167°F (75�C) |
| Overall Diameter | .159" (.4 cm) |
| Length | 1000 ft (304.8 m) |
| Weight | 17 lbs (7.7 kg) |
| Packaging Info | |
|---|---|
| Package Weight | 20.1 lb |
| Box Dimensions (LxWxH) | 12.8 x 12.8 x 10.6" |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.8 ★★★★★
Based on 14 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Excellent Product!
Ordered for my Lady, she’s says it’s an Excellent Product fir Removing Eye Make-Up.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 2, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Amazing make-up remover pads, that work just as well as oil base ones, without the oil.
I have tried many many make-up removers and I always come back to this one. I stumbled onto this one at a pharmacy a long time ago, and I can honestly say it's the best. I have tried many others since, high end, lower end, but this is my favorite. it's obviously extremely convenient, being in a pad, rather than having to wet a pad yourself, which poses a host of problems. Sometimes you run out of pads and you have to use toilet paper, which sucks, sometimes it spills, which you them have to clean, making an annoying two step process even more annoying, by it being a three step process. These convenient pads, a one step process, are so great, because unlike most other pads I tried, these are moist. I tried so many pads that lose their moisture after you open the package, and these remain very moist. I love that its a twist off cap. Also, they are the best at removing eye makeup, better than anything I tried, except for oil pads, HOWEVER, unlike oil pads, these do not make your vision blurry and get into your eye. This brand also makes oil pads, which i dislike. Oil always manages to get into my eyes, but the thing about oil pads is that they work at removing makeup. Well Guess what?!?! These work as well, WITHOUT THE OIL!!! And they DON'T dry out your eyes and face. Love them.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on September 13, 2015
★★★★★ 1
Ouch!! Update: Mold inside?
Update: I reduced my three star review to one star due to finding black specs all over lid inside my second jar with some black specks on the top pads. Mold? Mildew? I don't know have mold in my cabinets and I keep this in my top vanity drawer which is on its own wall nowhere near the tub or shower. I was so disgusted I threw out the whole jar plus my third one. I hate to write a bad review on a product that is such a good value and so needed in this market. Maybe it's just a one-off but either way I will not be repurchasing due to the soapy, stinging pads - mold or no mold. My conscience is telling me to warn people.
Original review:
They sting like there is micellar water in them? Plus soap. They are very sudsy and make you feel like you have to rinse your eyes before they dry out, which defeats the purpose. They do work well to get mascara off but so does soap. Sadly will not replace the old Almay oil-free remover pads which I have used for years. Have not found a good replacement for my dry, sensitive eyes. I will have to use them on other parts of my face but not my eyes.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 10, 2024
★★★★★ 4
My last batch has changed - be aware!
I have used these pads for several years now. They are generally very good and do the trick. I don't even look at other products because they are so good.
However, in this last order, they no longer have a smooth side and a bumpy side. They always had the different texture which helped in using them. I agree they are a little small which I have gotten used to, but now with both sides being smooth, they are much harder to use to wipe. Plus you don't have the advantage of the texture. This is a dowgrade for sure.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 22, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Oil and fragrance free for sensitive skin
Oil free which is good for contact lens wearers. Relatively thick textured material so I can use just one pad for both eyes. Ok for sensitive skin with no fragrance. I've used these for years and the quality has remained consistent despite the reasonable price.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 24, 2026