SKU: 10002818107

Class 37 - Loram - 37418 - Exclusive

Sale price$97.20 Regular price$108.00
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $27.00 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 27 - Aug 1

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

Class 37 - Loram - 37418 - Exclusive37418 An Comunn Gaidhealach Loram Rail Stored by EWS at Motherwell in April 2005, No. 37418 was purchased by preservationist Steve Beniston from Toton at the end of 2007. The former No. 37271 (built as D6971) initially spent a year at Allelys yard at Studley, before moving somewhat appropriately the to the East Lancashire Railway, after which it was named in April 1994. Repainted into the same EWS livery, albeit with its Railfreight Petroleum era name

37418 An Comunn Gaidhealach Loram Rail

Stored by EWS at Motherwell in April 2005, No. 37418 was purchased by preservationist Steve Beniston from Toton at the end of 2007. The former No. 37271 (built as D6971) initially spent a year at Allelys’ yard at Studley, before moving somewhat appropriately the to the East Lancashire Railway, after which it was named in April 1994. Repainted into the same EWS livery, albeit with its Railfreight Petroleum era name Pectindae, it entered service on the ELR almost immediately.

Unfortunately a power unit failure the following year in put it out of action until 2015, by which time it was half way through a repaint into large logo. In July 2017 it moved to Barrow Hill for further attention which would eventually lead to a long-term hire contract with Colas Rail. This was eventually realised in November 2018 when the Class 37/4 returned to the main line, now fully finished in its 1980s paint scheme complete with Highland ‘stag’ logo and its classic An Comunn Gaidhealach name (after the organisation that promotes the use of Scottish Gaelic) that it wore between October 1986 and February 1991.

It’s first year of Colas hire saw it used on Cardiff-Rhymney commuter turns, Network Rail test trains, and infrastructure/freight workings, while 2020 often found it partnered with NR saloon No. 975025 Caroline. In September 2022, Loram Rail, based at the Derby RTC, took over the hire of No. 37418. As well as its Caroline duties, which continued, the locomotive was common on shuttling vehicles between Toton and Derby in conjunction with the MRA to JNA-Y ‘Hawk’ rebuilding programme, as well as stock moves of both wagons and coaching stock.

 In January 2024 it was repainted into Loram Rail’s house colours of Flame red, black and white making it one of the most recognisable locomotives on the current railway network.

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 10002818107

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.7 ★★★★★
Based on 26 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
A
Verified Purchase
Audra Betzer
Dallas, US
★★★★★ 5
Classics! Good material with no stretch.
Size: 28, Color: Verified Vintage
I am in love with these jeans. I ordered another pair in a different wash. I also sized up two sizes but I like the looser, slouchy fit.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 17, 2026
J
Verified Purchase
Jackie McPheeteers
Omaha, US
★★★★★ 4
Back to the 70s
I love these. They fit perfect in the waist but are roomy else where.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 21, 2025
C
Verified Purchase
Cassie
Draper, US
★★★★★ 5
My favorite ever jean, I have a pair in every color
Size: 26, Color: Not My News Channel
I’m a little lanky (5’9”, 125-130lbs) and I want to like wide leg/baggy jeans so bad but every time I try them on, they look ridiculous on me. I look like a straight line in them, or they’re so baggy I feel like I’m wearing a costume. These have the baggy look I’ve been searching for for years but in an understated way that doesn’t make me feel shapeless. I’m also convinced that the buttons are more flattering over the fupa than a zipper. It’s like a hidden corset vs. a zipper that contours to your shape. If you’re in between sizes, definitely size down. Even if you’re not, you may still want to size down or buy both and return the one you don’t like
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 26, 2026
B
Verified Purchase
Buddy Bounds
Los Angeles, US
★★★★★ 1
Too short
Size: 29W x 30L, Color: Ecru Booper No Damage
Sadly not meant for tall people. I am 6” and these jeans are at least 3 inches too short, so i will be returning them. Disappointing that they don’t come in tall.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 29, 2026
D
Verified Purchase
Dimz
Lowell, US
★★★★★ 3
Horrible sizing & inconsistent fit
Size: 27W x 30L, Color: Ecru Booper No Damage
This pant does not fit the same as other colors from the same line/fit. I ordered this color and a light wash 501 90s Jean from Amazon after trying them on at Aritzia and both fit nothing like in store. This color has more fabric in the pocket area, making it wrinkly and unappealing when worn. I am usually. 25” waist (size 2-4 depending on brand), and I had to order a 27” for this to fit around my waist, so size up. I don’t think Levi’s work for curvy girls. I am 125lbs, 5’3”, and an hourglass shape. Levi’s don’t fit comfortably on my hourglass figure, which is unfortunate that such a famous brand still hasn’t perfected a fit for curvy people. The color, thickness, quality, and length were good though, but ultimately returning as it simply doesn’t look good on.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 3, 2025

recommand products