Pay in installments of $381.62 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Sep 27 - Oct 2
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
ACC-6083A Spirent® CFP2 Module 100GBase-LR4 (1310nm, SMF, 10km, LC, DOM)ACC 6083A Spirent CFP2 Module 100GBase LR4 (1310nm, SMF, 10km, LC, DOM) ATGBICS Spirent compatible ACC 6083A 100GBase LR4 form factor CFP2 module supports a distance of up to 10km over single mode fibre SMF using a wavelength of 1310nm via an LC Duplex connector. This product operates within a commercial temperature range. Digital optical monitoring (DOM) support is also present enabling real time monitoring of the parameters of the fibre optic
ACC-6083A Spirent® CFP2 Module 100GBase-LR4 (1310nm, SMF, 10km, LC, DOM)
ATGBICS Spirent® compatible ACC-6083A 100GBase-LR4 form factor CFP2 module supports a distance of up to 10km over single-mode fibre SMF using a wavelength of 1310nm via an LC Duplex connector. This product operates within a commercial temperature range. Digital optical monitoring (DOM) support is also present enabling real-time monitoring of the parameters of the fibre optic transceiver.
Our product meets the specification of Spirent® ACC-6083A and we proudly offer a compatibility guarantee and limited lifetime warranty. Our rigorously tested products record a unique traceable serial number and are fully compliant with all MSA (Multi-Source Agreement) and IEEE standards & protocols.
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.6 ★★★★★
Based on 10 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
My favorite sheet! High quality, thick, comfortable woven jersey cotton
Size: Queen, Color: 06 - Sand
I love these sheets! They feel like your very favorite tee shirt, but better! Thicker and softer! I love that these are organic. I stock several of these sheets as i love them so much. The tan color is very neutral and close to the color of my organic mattress, and I like to use these sheets as an extra layer over the mattress cover, as these are easy to wash and dry.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 3, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Soft comfortable fabric
Size: Full, Color: 06 - Sand
Super soft and comfortable! Washes well, nice color, good quality. Fits my mattress perfectly but not sure it would accommodate a mattress topper. Overall very satisfied with this product.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on July 16, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Must purchase
Size: Queen, Color: 01 - White
My favorite sheets. Super soft and also thick. I have had them throughout my time in college and each time I have purchased a new size mattress I have bought these sheets. Super easy to wash and get stains out of. I have white and they are still white after a year and a half.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 26, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Very comfy
Sheet feels super soft, but tough. Hopefully they're sturdy/thick enough to handle my husband's sandpaper feet and last longer than those cheap thin jersey sheets from Walmart. So far, though, totally impressed.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on September 20, 2025
★★★★★ 1
Sheets are not sized to fit.
Size: Twin XL, Color: 07 - Taupe
These XL twin sheets do NOT fit my xl twin mattresses. They are too long length wise and too short width wise. I have tried to use them several times and each time they do NOT stay on the mattress for even one day. I am very unhappy with the sizing and if I could return them I would. Was just a waste of good money in my opinion
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 6, 2026