SKU: 75085055489

NGK Cadillac Escalade 2005-2003 Direct Fit Oxygen Sensor

$63.44 $70.49
Save 10%
No.2 Bestseller on lamcf.fr >

Pay in installments of $17.62 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 27 - Sep 1

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

NGK Cadillac Escalade 2005-2003 Direct Fit Oxygen SensorNTK is the world's largest supplier and manufacturer of OEM oxygen sensors. Oxygen sensors play a critical role as part of the vehicle's on board diagnostic system in maintaining optimal engine performance, maximizing fuel efficiency and reducing harmful emissions. Providing constant closed loop feedback to the ECU, oxygen sensors help to control the air fuel ratio while alerting OBDII systems of possible problems with fuel delivery or catalytic

NTK is the world's largest supplier and manufacturer of OEM oxygen sensors. Oxygen sensors play a critical role as part of the vehicle's on-board diagnostic system in maintaining optimal engine performance, maximizing fuel efficiency and reducing harmful emissions. Providing constant closed loop feedback to the ECU, oxygen sensors help to control the air-fuel ratio while alerting OBDII systems of possible problems with fuel delivery or catalytic converter efficiency. A ceramics company at our core, NTK uses state-of-the art technology enabling control of the ceramic element used in our oxygen sensors from raw material to finished product. Trust The Sensor Specialist for full-line market support and OE application technology.

  • ADVANCED CERAMIC SENSOR ELEMENT: 3-stage contaminant-resistant plasma jet and deposit trap overcoat protects against element poisoning

This Part Fits:

Year Make Model Submodel
2008 Buick Enclave CX
2008 Buick Enclave CXL
2005-2009 Buick LaCrosse CX
2005-2009 Buick LaCrosse CXL
2007-2011 Buick Lucerne CX
2007-2011 Buick Lucerne CXL
2010 Buick Lucerne CXL Special Edition
2005 Buick Rainier CXL
2005 Buick Rainier CXL Plus
2006-2007 Buick Rendezvous CX
2006-2007 Buick Rendezvous CXL
2005-2007 Buick Terraza CX
2005-2007 Buick Terraza CXL
2009-2015 Cadillac CTS V
2004-2005 Cadillac DeVille Base
2004-2005 Cadillac DeVille DHS
2004-2005 Cadillac DeVille DTS
2004-2005 Cadillac DeVille Protection Series
2003-2005,2008-2014 Cadillac Escalade Base
2009-2013 Cadillac Escalade Hybrid
2010-2013 Cadillac Escalade Hybrid Platinum
2011-2014 Cadillac Escalade Luxury
2008-2014 Cadillac Escalade Platinum
2011-2014 Cadillac Escalade Premium
2008-2014 Cadillac Escalade ESV Base
2011-2014 Cadillac Escalade ESV Luxury
2008-2014 Cadillac Escalade ESV Platinum
2011-2014 Cadillac Escalade ESV Premium
2008-2013 Cadillac Escalade EXT Base
2011-2013 Cadillac Escalade EXT Luxury
2011-2013 Cadillac Escalade EXT Premium
2004 Cadillac Seville SLS
2013 Chevrolet Avalanche Black Diamond LS
2013 Chevrolet Avalanche Black Diamond LT
2013 Chevrolet Avalanche Black Diamond LTZ
2008-2012 Chevrolet Avalanche LS
2008-2012 Chevrolet Avalanche LT
2008-2012 Chevrolet Avalanche LTZ
2003-2005 Chevrolet Avalanche 1500 Base
2005 Chevrolet Avalanche 1500 LS
2005 Chevrolet Avalanche 1500 LT
2003 Chevrolet Avalanche 1500 North Face
2003 Chevrolet Avalanche 1500 On Road Edition
2003 Chevrolet Avalanche 1500 WBH
2004-2005 Chevrolet Avalanche 1500 Z66
2003-2005 Chevrolet Avalanche 1500 Z71
2011-2013 Chevrolet Caprice PPV
2005,2010 Chevrolet Cobalt Base
2005-2010 Chevrolet Cobalt LS
2005-2010 Chevrolet Cobalt LT
2006-2007 Chevrolet Cobalt LTZ
2008 Chevrolet Cobalt Sport
2006-2007 Chevrolet Cobalt SS
2004 Chevrolet Corvette Base
2004 Chevrolet Corvette Z06
2005-2009 Chevrolet Equinox LS
2005-2009 Chevrolet Equinox LT
2008-2009 Chevrolet Equinox LTZ
2006-2011 Chevrolet HHR LS
2007-2011 Chevrolet HHR LS Panel
2006-2011 Chevrolet HHR LT
2007-2010 Chevrolet HHR LT Panel
2008 Chevrolet Impala 50th Anniversary Edition
2006-2011 Chevrolet Impala LS
2006-2011 Chevrolet Impala LT
2006-2011 Chevrolet Impala LTZ
2006-2011 Chevrolet Impala Police
2008 Chevrolet Malibu Classic LS
2008 Chevrolet Malibu Classic LT
2004-2010 Chevrolet Malibu LS
2004-2012 Chevrolet Malibu LT
2006-2012 Chevrolet Malibu LTZ
2004 Chevrolet Malibu Maxx
2004-2007 Chevrolet Malibu Maxx LS
2004-2007 Chevrolet Malibu Maxx LT
2006-2007 Chevrolet Malibu Maxx LTZ
2006-2007 Chevrolet Malibu Maxx SS
2006-2007 Chevrolet Malibu SS
2006-2007 Chevrolet Monte Carlo LS
2006-2007 Chevrolet Monte Carlo LT
2006 Chevrolet Monte Carlo LTZ
2003-2005 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 Base
2004-2005,2009-2013 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 Hybrid
2003-2005,2007-2013 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 LS
2003-2005,2007-2013 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 LT
2007-2013 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 LTZ
2003-2005,2007-2013 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 WT
2010-2013 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 XFE
2004-2005 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 Z71 Off-Road
2007-2010 Chevrolet Silverado 2500 HD LT
2007-2010 Chevrolet Silverado 2500 HD LTZ
2007-2010 Chevrolet Silverado 2500 HD WT
2007-2010 Chevrolet Silverado 3500 HD LT
2007-2010 Chevrolet Silverado 3500 HD LTZ
2007-2010 Chevrolet Silverado 3500 HD WT
2013-2015 Chevrolet Spark LS
2013-2015 Chevrolet Spark LT
2005 Chevrolet SSR Base
2003-2005,2008-2014 Chevrolet Suburban 1500 LS
2003-2005,2008-2014 Chevrolet Suburban 1500 LT
2008-2014 Chevrolet Suburban 1500 LTZ
2003-2005 Chevrolet Suburban 1500 Z71
2008-2013 Chevrolet Suburban 2500 LS
2008-2013 Chevrolet Suburban 2500 LT
2008-2013 Chevrolet Tahoe Hybrid
2003-2005,2008-2014 Chevrolet Tahoe LS
2003-2005,2008-2014 Chevrolet Tahoe LT
2008-2014 Chevrolet Tahoe LTZ
2008-2014 Chevrolet Tahoe PPV
2012-2014 Chevrolet Tahoe SSV
2003-2005 Chevrolet Tahoe Z71
2005 Chevrolet Trailblazer EXT LS
2005 Chevrolet Trailblazer EXT LT
2005-2008 Chevrolet Uplander Base
2005-2008 Chevrolet Uplander LS
2005-2008 Chevrolet Uplander LT
2007-2008 GMC Acadia SLE
2007-2008 GMC Acadia SLT
2005 GMC Envoy Denali
2005 GMC Envoy XL Denali
2005 GMC Envoy XL SLE
2005 GMC Envoy XL SLT
2005 GMC Envoy XUV SLE
2005 GMC Envoy XUV SLT
2003-2005 GMC Sierra 1500 Base
2007-2013 GMC Sierra 1500 Denali
2005,2009-2013 GMC Sierra 1500 Hybrid
2003,2007-2013 GMC Sierra 1500 SL
2003-2005,2007-2013 GMC Sierra 1500 SLE
2003-2005,2007-2013 GMC Sierra 1500 SLT
2003-2005,2007-2013 GMC Sierra 1500 WT
2010-2013 GMC Sierra 1500 XFE
2007-2010 GMC Sierra 2500 HD SLE
2007-2010 GMC Sierra 2500 HD SLT
2007-2010 GMC Sierra 2500 HD WT
2007-2010 GMC Sierra 3500 HD SLE
2007-2010 GMC Sierra 3500 HD SLT
2007-2010 GMC Sierra 3500 HD WT
2008-2014 GMC Yukon Denali
2010-2013 GMC Yukon Denali Hybrid
2008-2013 GMC Yukon Hybrid
2003-2005,2008-2014 GMC Yukon SLE
2003-2005,2008-2014 GMC Yukon SLT
2008-2014 GMC Yukon XL 1500 Denali
2003-2005,2008-2014 GMC Yukon XL 1500 SLE
2003-2005,2008-2014 GMC Yukon XL 1500 SLT
2008-2013 GMC Yukon XL 2500 SLE
2008-2013 GMC Yukon XL 2500 SLT
2005 Isuzu Ascender Limited
2005 Isuzu Ascender LS
2005 Isuzu Ascender S
2004-2005 Pontiac Bonneville GXP
2007-2009 Pontiac G5 Base
2007-2009 Pontiac G5 GT
2005-2010 Pontiac G6 Base
2005-2010 Pontiac G6 GT
2006-2007 Pontiac G6 GTP
2008-2009 Pontiac G6 GXP
2008-2009 Pontiac G8 GT
2009 Pontiac G8 GXP
2005-2008 Pontiac Grand Prix Base
2005 Pontiac Grand Prix GT
2004-2006 Pontiac GTO Base
2005-2006 Pontiac Montana SV6
2006-2007 Pontiac Solstice Base
2006-2009 Pontiac Torrent Base
2005 Saab 9-7x Arc
2007-2008 Saturn Aura XE
2007-2009 Saturn Aura XR
2005 Saturn Ion 1
2005-2007 Saturn Ion 2
2005-2007 Saturn Ion 3
2007-2008 Saturn Outlook XE
2007-2008 Saturn Outlook XR
2007 Saturn Relay 1
2005-2007 Saturn Relay 2
2005-2007 Saturn Relay 3
2007 Saturn Sky Base
2006-2007 Saturn Vue Base
2007 Saturn Vue Green Line
2008-2009 Saturn Vue Red Line
2008-2010 Saturn Vue XE
2008-2010 Saturn Vue XR
Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 75085055489

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.3 ★★★★★
Based on 18 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
T
Verified Purchase
Terry Anne
Waukegan, US
★★★★★ 3
Only holds towels in place when it is full or 1/2 full
Color: 01-silver
If you are buying this for the feature of holding the paper towels in place so you can just rip one, I think you will be disappointed. Once the roll becomes smaller (and I tried changing the arm) the arm does not touch the towels. I do like the firm grip on the counter. My other dissatisfaction is the base gets water spots. Being near the sink this happens frequently. It does its job and is attractive.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 21, 2026
J
Verified Purchase
Jay
Port Orchard, US
★★★★★ 5
Stylish
Color: 01-silver
Good sturdy stand for paper towels. Has small suction cups on bottom for stability. Good finish and good fit under the counter. Heavy base and not flimsy feeling. Brushed aluminum matched other appliances well.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 6, 2026
T
Verified Purchase
The product comes in multiple colors, but the function is terrible
Omaha, US
★★★★★ 5
Goodbye for the value
Color: 02-black
Great value looks wonderful very adorable
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 31, 2026
J
Verified Purchase
J. Thomas Campbell
Port Orchard, US
★★★★★ 5
David Rohl: A "Maverick" in Search of History
Format: Paperback
Recently I wrote a review of Peter Enns' book "The Evolution of Adam" in which I made a brief reference to David Rohl's "From Eden to Exile: The 5000 Year History of the People of the Bible." Several friends who read the review emailed me, curious about Rohl's book and encouraging me to follow up on Enns' book with a somewhat detailed review of From Eden to Exile. Hence...this review. From Eden to Exile is Rohl's own "follow-up" to his previous book "Pharaohs and Kings: A Biblical Quest." It's important here that I inform the reader of the following: (1) Pharaohs and Kings (in my view) is a far more compelling book than From Eden to Exile; and (2) I would strongly recommend that readers unfamiliar with Rohl read Pharaohs and Kings, prior to reading From Eden to Exile. With these thoughts in mind (and before commenting on Eden to Exile), I believe it will prove worthwhile to focus briefly on Rohl's Pharaohs and Kings prior to moving on to his second book - the two being closely related in terms of subject matter. First, it needs to be stated here at the outset that Rohl (unfortunately) has not received much in the way of either praise and/or encouragment from his fellow Egyptologists, most of whom see him as a sort of "reckless intruder" into the discipline, presenting arguments for a revised chronology (what Rohl refers to as "the New Chronology") that his critics appear to regard as little more than fanciful speculation. This is most unfortunate. Rohl's views are fully deserving of critical assessment; however, the casual (sometimes contemptuous) manner with which his views have been almost entirely dismissed hardly constitutes the "finest hour" in the discipline of ancient Egyptian studies - and this would include the oftentimes quite dismissive attitude of Kenneth A. Kitchen, an Egyptologist and conservative Christian who has written his own book on the subject:"On the Reliability of the Old Testament," Eerdmans, 2003. I clearly am no scholar on the history of ancient Egypt. On the other hand, I have been reading on the subject extensively now for more than 40 years - and this out of sheer love for the subject as opposed to academic profession. And one thing I have learned throughout this reading process is that ancient Egyptian chronology is - for a certainty - in some degree of chaos. (It's not all that difficult to locate comments to this effect from Egyptologists themselves). The standard reference guide for the chronology of ancient Egypt is based foundationally on a chronological history of the ancient pharaohs that dates all the way back to the writings of an Egyptian priest named Manetho, whose written account dates to the third century BC - not exactly what we normally consider "the latest available evidence." Furthermore, Manetho's account itself has not survived; what we do know of it is to be found in the writings of Josephus (first century AD), and the early church fathers Julius Africanus (third century AD) and Eusebius (fourth century AD). Indeed, Egyptian scholar (and conservative Christian) James K. Hoffmeier acknowledges as much in his recent book "Ancient Israel in Sinai" (Oxford, 2005) when he writes regarding Manetho's account: "It is widely acknowledged that names are garbled and that some of the dynasties are not sequential but contemporaneous, and that there are clearly legendary stories preserved... Nevertheless," he continues, "Manetho is taken seriously in historical studies." Indeed he is! Egyptologists have precious little more to go on from the ancient world other than Manetho's account. And yet it is somewhat astonishing to discover the extent to which Manetho's account has been (for the most part) dogmatized into a rigid system that appears to be unyielding. And it is against this rigid wall of Egyptological dogmatism that Rohl must butt his head. (Little wonder that he is not fondly regarded within the discipline). That being said, I would strongly caution all readers (and especially readers of the Old Testament, where a good deal of its chronology is tied directly to Manetho's modernized system) to regard this correlation - between OT chronology and Egyptian chronology - with some degree of appropriate caution. In fact, the very controversy over the date of the Exodus (13th century or 15th century) is related directly to the unbridled confusion surrounding ancient Egyptian chronology. As regards From Eden to Exile I would state the following: (1) Rohl's treatment of early Genesis (Adam to Abraham) is highly speculative and he appears to be connecting dots that were never intended to be contiguous; (2) his book takes on greater promise when he reaches the area of his own particular expertise: Joseph in Egypt. Rohl places Joseph firmly within the 12th dynasty, during the reign of pharaohs Senuseret III and Amenemhat III - and his arguments here (despite the standard protest from his fellow scholars) are highly compelling and fully deserving of something other than "we standard Egyptologists always know best!" (Quite frankly, I've reached the point where I believe a more positive - and more accurate! - understanding of ancient Egyptian chronology will have to await the work of younger scholars (and Rohl has plenty of them!) who are more willing to think outside the box by considering other possibilities. As so often happens, we must simply wait for the 'old guard' to retire so that younger scholars - with fresh ideas and a willingness to engage new evidence - can take their place.) And, finally (3); although much of From Eden to Exile is written in a style reminiscent of historical novels, this should not (in and of itself) cause the reader to think that all we have here is manufactured storyline. On the contrary (certainly beginning with Joseph), Rohl weaves his factual history into the unfolding story in such a way as to make the history not only real but filled with life and event. Furthermore, Rohl fully acknowledges in his Introduction that he will be telling a narrative story as he seeks to "fill in the gaps" where hard evidence from ancient historical sources is plain and simply unavailable. And because Rohl distances himself from any particular religious affiliation it means that both evangelicals and fundamentalists should be able to read his account to great profit, without becoming unduly disturbed by some of his conclusions (e.g., the first five chapters). Indeed, his astonishing defense of the historical integrity of the biblical account displays enormous objectivity, far surpassing (in many ways) various books on the subject that have been produced by Christian publishers throughout the past 25 years. I would like to conclude my comments here by strongly urging all evangelical OT scholars to thoroughly familiarize themselves with Rohl's writings - Pharaohs and Kings in particular. Despite his critics this book is entirely deserving of serious reflection. His defense of a 15th century date for the Exodus is (in my view...and the view of many others) highly compelling and by no means easy to dismiss. (I fully understand that most evangelical scholars opt for the later date of 1250 BC during the reign of Rameses II). One continues to wonder, however, why the reference to Rameses in Genesis 47:11 is so easily regarded as an anachronism while Exodus 1:11 somehow places one firmly within the reign of Rameses II. Or why the clear reference to 480 years in 1 Kings 6:1 is so easily dismissed as most likely merely symbolic as opposed to actual - this despite the additional support for a literal understanding of these years that one gets from Joshua 11:26. But then we already know why: standard Egyptian chronology places Rameses II in the mid-thirteenth century BC, all of which "harmonizes" so well with Exodus 1:11. Thus, ipso facto, the Exodus occurred @ 1250 BC. I find myself far more persuaded by Rohl's account of the Hyksos invasion of Egypt (very likely the Asiatic Amalakites of Exodus 17) following upon the Exodus, when Egypt was almost disemboweled and severely weakened by a God named Yahweh, then any other account of the Hyksos invasion I have ever read from any standard Egyptian historian. (By the way: a quick perusal of ten books in my own library on ancient Egypt displays an enormous amount of diversity and subjective opinion, a rather clear indication that (voices to the contrary) there is precious little overall harmony and understanding amongst the scholars themselves when dealing with numerous aspects of ancient Egypt and its pharaohs.) Perhaps all of Rohl's conclusions are entirely bogus. Nonetheless, the massive amount of information he offers the reader for serious consideration needs to be offset by responsible Egyptian historians who can demonstrate (clearly and persuasively) the error of his ways, and do so with strong and powerful evidence that will illustrate the point. (Ad hominen arguments are worthless as a retort.) I have yet to see such a detailed book (with good, solid evidence as opposed to preferred dogmatism) written in response to the growing body of historical evidence that Rohl and his staff of young investigators are busy compiling. This fact alone only raises more unsettling questions regarding the overall integrity of an Egyptian chronology that rests almost entirely and uncritically on a now lost document that dates back to several centuries before Christ. Rohl, via his own admission, is clearly outside the Christian faith...or any other faith. However, in terms of defending the historical integrity of scripture, he may well be the best friend any believer ever had. All the more, therefore, is the pity that OT scholars either have chosen to ignore him entirely...or (the more likely alternative) have never even heard of him. Hopefully...this will change in the very near future.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 21, 2012
M
Verified Purchase
Mark W. Miller
Port Orchard, US
★★★★★ 5
the garden was a real place, legends do have seeds of truth
Format: Paperback, Format: Paperback
very well researched and the use of multiple sources/ events used to lock in events and CHRONOLOGIES is done with a sense of going where the evidence leads, instead of trying to CREATE a narrative. it is amazing how the people and place names shift thru the various empires and then later, the legends. very interesting that the exodus event vanquishes egypt, the the hyksos/ indo europeans take over and loot upper egypt. I totally agree with shishak mistake and new chronology. I find it fascinating king Akhenaten and tut were contemporary with king david and soloman. very interesting read about etruscians/ rome and carthage being remnants of troy. I love history this was a very interesting read. but be prepared for a menagerie of languages and names.....
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 7, 2020

recommand products

FROST 300NL - SWING TOP WASTE RECEPTACLE
144.50
RAPI-ZORB FLUID CONTROL
24.07
UNIVERSAL GARBAGE CONTAINER DOLLY
60.53
Cropped Pull-On Pants with Button Detail
18.00
16OZ DEODORANT BLOCKS - 6CS
57.00