Pay in installments of $787.94 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 27 - Sep 1
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
Netgear AV Line M4350-32F8V Ethernet SwitchThe Netgear AV Line M4350 32F8V is engineered and certified for audio video over IP with dedicated service and support, delivering a seamless blend of AV performance and IT reliability. Building on the simplicity of the M4250 AV Line, the M4350 adds enterprise class hardware, redundant power options, and larger fabrics to handle demanding AV IT deployments. Designed to simplify complex AV over IP networks, this switch is built for professional
The Netgear AV Line M4350-32F8V is engineered and certified for audio/video over IP with dedicated service and support, delivering a seamless blend of AV performance and IT reliability. Building on the simplicity of the M4250 AV Line, the M4350 adds enterprise-class hardware, redundant power options, and larger fabrics to handle demanding AV/IT deployments. Designed to simplify complex AV over IP networks, this switch is built for professional installations where dependable transport, predictable latency, and robust management are non-negotiable.
- Enterprise-grade hardware with redundant power — The M4350-32F8V provides redundant power supplies and hot-swappable components to maximize uptime, ensuring continuous operation in critical AV environments such as broadcast studios, conference centers, and large lecture halls.
- 32 fixed ports plus 8 high-speed uplinks — This model combines a dense edge port set with scalable uplinks, enabling you to connect numerous AV endpoints while maintaining ample bandwidth for backbone and distribution traffic.
- 25G and 100G fabric for AV over IP — Enhanced transport fabrics support low-latency, high-throughput media delivery, preserving fidelity for uncompressed and near‑uncompressed AV streams across the network.
- AV over IP certification and QoS for media traffic — Engineered for AV/IT convergence, the switch includes AV-specific quality of service, multicast control, and traffic prioritization to ensure smooth, jitter-free playback and collaboration across devices.
- Reliability with enterprise features and dedicated support — Alongside resilient hardware, Netgear delivers enterprise-grade service, warranty coverage, and access to specialized AV/IT guidance to optimize deployment and operation.
Technical Details of Netgear AV Line M4350-32F8V Ethernet Switch
- Model: M4350-32F8V
- Purpose: AV over IP Ethernet switch designed for professional AV/IT deployments
- Ports: 32 fixed edge ports with 8 high-speed uplink/fabric ports
- Fabric/Uplink Speeds: 25G and 100G fabric options to support high-bandwidth AV transport
- Power: Redundant hot-swappable power supplies for failover and high availability
- Chassis/Form Factor: Enterprise-class switch designed for rack-mount deployment in data centers or AV control rooms
- Networking Features: Layer 2 and Layer 3 switching basics, QoS tailored for AV traffic, multicast (IGMP/MLD) support, and AV‑oriented traffic engineering
- Management: On-premises and integrated management options with Netgear AV/IT management tooling; supports secure access, firmware updates, and configuration backup
- Certifications: AV over IP certified to meet industry expectations for reliable media transport
How to install Netgear AV Line M4350-32F8V Ethernet Switch
Installing the M4350-32F8V is straightforward for AV/IT teams familiar with enterprise switches. Begin by planning a secure, well-ventilated rack space with adequate airflow and a stable power source. Ensure access to the management interface and that you have the latest firmware from Netgear’s portal to maximize performance and security.
1) Mount and power: Install the switch in a standard 19-inch rack, connect both redundant power supplies, and verify power-on self-test completes successfully. Position the unit to minimize physical interference with cables and to optimize cooling.
2) Network layout planning: Map edge devices (AV endpoints, encoders/decoders, control panels) to the 32 fixed ports. Designate uplink paths to the core network using the 8 high-speed fabric ports, ensuring redundancy where possible. Prepare VLANs and multicast groups for AV traffic as required by the deployment scenario.
3) Initial configuration: Access the management interface via the default IP address or a temporary management network. Apply the latest firmware, set a strong admin password, and enable secure management protocols. Configure basic network settings, including VLANs, QoS policies tuned for AV traffic, and multicast controls for streaming endpoints.
4) AV-specific tuning: Implement AV QoS profiles to prioritize critical streams (e.g., uncompressed video, synchronized room systems) over general data traffic. Enable IGMP/MLD snooping and appropriate multicast routing to ensure reliable group communications and minimized latency jitter for live feeds.
5) Validation and hardening: Connect representative AV devices to edge ports, then perform end-to-end testing of latency, jitter, and packet loss. Validate failover for power supplies, verify uplink stability on 25G/100G paths, and confirm that management access is secured. Periodically check firmware updates and monitor switch health through the AV/IT management suite.
Once configured, document the topology, port mappings, QoS rules, and multicast configurations to simplify future maintenance and expansion. The M4350-32F8V is designed to scale with your AV expansion plans, preserving performance as new endpoints and higher‑bandwidth streams are added to the network.
Frequently asked questions
- What is the Netgear M4350-32F8V best used for? It is built for AV over IP deployments that require reliable, low-latency media transport with enterprise-grade hardware. Typical use cases include broadcast facilities, large conference venues, education campuses, houses of worship, and corporate AV systems where AV/IT convergence is essential.
- What makes the M4350 distinct from entry-level switches? The M4350 combines redundant power, larger fabric capacity with 25G/100G uplinks, and AV-certified features, offering higher availability, better scalability, and AV-optimized traffic handling compared with basic switches.
- Does the M4350-32F8V support PoE? This model emphasizes AV/IT convergence and high-bandwidth transport. PoE support is not highlighted in its core specifications; refer to the official spec sheet for precise power delivery capabilities and PoE availability for edge devices.
- How is AV traffic prioritized on this switch? The switch provides AV-oriented QoS and traffic engineering to prioritize critical media streams, ensure deterministic delivery, and reduce jitter for synchronized AV playback across endpoints.
- What management options are available? Netgear’s AV/IT management framework supports centralized configuration, firmware updates, and monitoring. The switch can be managed on-site or integrated into broader network management workflows, with security features to protect access and configurations.
- Can I scale this switch easily if my AV network grows? Yes. With 32 fixed ports and 8 uplink/fabric ports, you can expand by adding additional switches and distributing AV streams across the fabric, leveraging the 25G/100G uplinks to maintain performance as demands increase.
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.1 ★★★★★
Based on 25 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Does the job.
Works as a paper towel holder. Its a stick. It doesnt look like a cheap stick and it didn't break. Which means it met all my criteria. Great job.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 3, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Nice product
Color: Gold-aa
when having guests over, it's nice for each one to use their own towel instead of having a 'community' guest towel, or those fancy ones that people feel guilty using. This solved the problem.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 7, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Rich
Format: Paperback
A wonderful book that illuminates the reality of the God of Israel compared to the ANE deities.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 28, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Excellent. An invaluable resource!
Format: Paperback
Recently I have been reading a lot of books that have told me that the Bible's story of Adam and Eve plus the Exodus etc. are all myths that are extremely similar. Therefore, we should rethink the Bible and change our understanding of it to a more modern worldview that incorporates this knowledge and denies any sort of originality in the biblical account. John Oswalt thinks differently. He thinks that the Genesis story of origins is not some random piece of Semitic or Mesopotamian literature, but that is really unique revelation from God (and is prepared to back that statement up!).
The book is divided into two sections:
The Bible and Myth
The Bible and History
Oswalt spends the first few chapters defining the world of the Old Testament and trying to find a definition for the word myth. He comes to the conclusion that a myth "the reflection of a certain way of thinking about the world. To be sure, because of the way in which it thinks, the fantastic is often found in myth. But it is not the presence of the fantastic that makes a piece of literature myth; rather, it is the presence of the mythic worldview." This worldview, he asserts, is based off of what he calls "continuity," which he describes as "when the human, natural, and divine realms are expressed and actualized [together]." The worldview that assumes continuity is based on the here and now, and is very panentheistic. Primordial time is a key factor and the gods are dependent on the humans. This is not so with the biblical worldview. The worldview of the Bible assumes transcendence - an independent God meeting with people on his own terms. He then compares and contrasts these views and shows the real differences between stories like Enimu Elish and Genesis 1. He doesn't deny similarities in the narratives, but he shows the differences in the worldviews.
He then moves on to history. Just like the word "myth," Oswalt has to define history, because how civilizations have viewed history in the past has never been the same as Western civilization views history. Then he asks whether or not the Bible is history, and whether or not it matters. He makes several great points here, one of which is that ancient annuals and chronicles never recorded the defeats of kings, yet we find Israel's holy book littered with their failures and mess ups. This is a serious deal when looking at whether or not the Bible is history, because in the ancient way of thinking this surely stands out. He then looks at other questions, like "Are Biblical Faith and Biblical History Inseparable?" and responds to some critics (including Bultmann!).
He then looks into the origins of the Israelites' worldview by means of authorship. Is the Bible a late text that was updated from an older, polytheistic one? "No!" says Oswalt. He deals with critiques here as well before moving on to a brilliant conclusion where he sums up the book and gives us a view of how modernism and rationalism are taking us back to the worldview based on continuity.
Overall, this was a brilliant book and I wish I had read it sooner!!! It seems like so many authors today are trying to convince us that the Bible has so much in common with the other stories of origin out of an anti-biblical or liberal worldview (like
). However, under close scrutiny these criticisms do not stand up. I thank John for this book, and I will be recommending it to countless others!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on August 11, 2012
★★★★★ 4
Excellent analysis, decent theorizing
Format: Kindle
While the analysis and argumentation presented in The Bible among the Myths is outstanding, the early chapters of the book suffer from a few problems. First - and this is mainly a complaint given my own preferences - the style of writing in chapters 1-4 differs noticeably from that of the rest of the book. While the introduction and chapters 5-10 reflect a learned, academic style, the first four chapters are written more casually, without quite the same rigor that characterizes most of Oswalt's writing. I am not entirely sure of the reason for this difference, and I wouldn't mention it if it were not for the second issue.
These same chapters reflect their writing style in their content, so much so that I nearly gave up on the book after the first three chapters. While I appreciate the author's need to provide background information, definitions, and an overarching theoretical framework, his methodology as laid out in the text is much less rigorous than I would prefer to see. The first few chapters are much less heavily annotated, with fewer scholarly references and a great number of offhanded summaries. He labels his approach to the definition of "myth" as phenomenological, that is, examining the common characteristics of a variety of myths in order to summarize what is essential about them. However, his listings of these common characteristics are vague and poorly related to actual bodies of mythology that survive to the present day. Examples, when cited, are drawn almost exclusively from the Greek and Egyptian traditions. For the understanding of Israelite culture as it relates to its neighbors, this is certainly a fair beginning; for the definition of myth, which is a worldwide phenomenon transcending culture and geography, it seems very far from adequate.
As someone who has a thorough knowledge of Christianity and Greco-Roman mythology and at least a nodding acquaintance with Egyptian, Norse/Germanic, and Celtic mythologies, I can at least begin to fill in some of the gaps in Oswalt's analysis. His generalizations, although sweeping, are not particularly problematic, but I am concerned that he embarks upon such a grand theoretical project without doing at least a little more specific analysis of various individual mythologies to demonstrate his points. More problematic in my opinion is that he groups all these various mythologies into a single worldview. Any number of scholars have tried to broaden the interpretations of myths to demonstrate that all cultures revert to the same basic narrative (The Golden Bough being the most famous example, and The Hero with a Thousand Faces being a more recent one); none of them has succeeded particularly well from a scholarly perspective.
Despite this early weakness, Oswalt's work undergoes a dramatic improvement starting in chapter 5. His basic point - that the essential view of reality in Israel is demonstrably opposed to the view held by any of its neighbors - can be made without resorting to the sweeping claims of the earlier chapters, and he does an excellent job of presenting and analyzing the evidence for his view. His terminology (of "continuity" and "transcendence"), while not quite adequate to present an overarching definition and theory of what constitutes a myth, is certainly well-suited to his specific analysis.
In particular, the analysis of the supposed parallels between the Enuma Elish and Genesis 1 is outstandingly done. After presenting a table with the usual outline of the Enuma Elish against the outline of Genesis 1, he simply proceeds to list the major plot events and how much time it takes to relate each one in the text itself. From this alone, it is readily apparent that the prevailing "outline" has intentionally been generated to encourage comparison to the Genesis account of creation. Such spurious efforts - minimizing the events of over 500 lines of poetry, while selecting 5 which bear questionable similarity to a verse in Genesis - are not honest scholarship, and kudos to Oswalt for pointing this out. I agree with a previous reviewer that it would have been helpful to append the text of the Enuma Elish in parallel with Genesis for readers to compare for themselves would have been a nice touch, but Oswalt's claims are not so elevated that they could not be disproven by direct appeal to the text.
One final note. A previous reviewer noted that many of the authors Oswalt discusses wrote between the 60's and 80's, and complained that this made the book seem "dated." I am a graduate student in classics, and can assure those who are concerned that in any field dealing with antiquity, "dated" sources are often some of the most important. Unlike quantum physics, which has less than a century of history, the classic writings of antiquity and the history of those eras has been studied for over two millennia. Meaningful research begins, in fact, with the scholars of Alexandria who worked around 300 BCE; often the work they have done is not duplicated anywhere else. In the field of Ancient Near Eastern studies and Biblical studies in particular, there is likewise a long history of scholarly and interpretive effort. Sources less than a hundred years old are not dated - in the grand scheme of things, they are actually quite recent. It is also worth noting that many of the very recent books, which the reviewer presumably has in mind, are written for a popular audience and would not be considered truly scholarly efforts. Some are written by scholars, but those specific books are unlikely to come up in a serious academic analysis of the subject. The views entertained by those books, however, are very clearly addressed in The Bible among the Myths - largely because the scholarly arguments they were based on are much older than most people assume. Just because Oswalt does not mention names of popular authors does not mean that his argument fails to cover all its bases.
All in all, the book is well written and persuasive. The earlier chapters might be found in any popular book on the subject, but the later chapters are more clearly of a scholarly bent, with corresponding vocabulary; readers who are looking for more of a lay approach to the issues may want to look for another author. However, the analysis of parallels between the Old Testament and the surviving Ancient Near Eastern literature is well-presented and balanced, and Oswalt's treatment of other scholars in the field seems to be fair. (I have not read any of their works myself, but Oswalt presents both strengths and weaknesses when considering whether an author's position is sufficiently explanatory and praises some aspects of works he disagrees with. He also is willing to point out when he agrees with some of the author's data, but draws a different conclusion. All of this strikes me as favorable.) The later chapters are thoroughly referenced in endnotes and draw from a variety of sources.
Chapters 1-4: 3.5 stars
Chapters 5-10: 5 stars
Overall: 4.5 stars
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 2, 2014