SKU: 42612726218

Borla 3 in ATAK Catback Non-Active Exhaust- Black Chrome Quad Tip for 2024 Ford Mustang GT 5.0L V8 (140970BC)

$922.49 $1024.99
Save 10%
No.2 Bestseller on lamcf.fr >

Pay in installments of $256.25 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 31 - Sep 5

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

Borla 3 in ATAK Catback Non-Active Exhaust- Black Chrome Quad Tip for 2024 Ford Mustang GT 5.0L V8 (140970BC)EXCEPT Convertible. This 3" diameter True Dual Quad Tip BORLA Cat Back system features a merge X Pipe for increased performance and improved sound. Muffler contains Polyphonic Harmonizer technolgy which utilizes patented units that contain pipes of different diameters and lengths to create multiple exhaust notes that harmonize to deliver a clean, rich, full bodied sound. This system features the aggressive ATAK sound and 4" black chrome on T 304

EXCEPT Convertible. This 3" diameter True Dual Quad Tip BORLA Cat-Back system features a merge X-Pipe for increased performance and improved sound. Muffler contains Polyphonic Harmonizer technolgy which utilizes patented units that contain pipes of different diameters and lengths to create multiple exhaust notes that harmonize to deliver a clean, rich, full-bodied sound. This system features the aggressive ATAK sound and 4" black chrome on T-304 stainless steel tips and is for vehicles WITHOUT the Active Exhaust feature. Using BORLA Stainless Steel Polish p# 21461 is NOT recommended with these black chrome tips. Systems with bright chrome on T-304 stainless steel tips, and carbon fiber tips are also available. If your car has 1 tip on each muffler and you want to upgrade it to 2 tips on each muffler (also know as quad tips), this is the system for you. It is designed to work with the quad tip (2 tips per muffler) O.E. Ford Valance ONLY. If you want to install this system on a vehicle that came with one tip per muffler you will need to buy and install a different valance. Ford quad tip valance part numbers: With Parking Sensors = PR3Z-17F828-DA, Without Parking Sensors = PR3Z-17F828-CA. BORLA Cat-Back and Axle-Back exhaust systems feature patented straight-through and multi-core technology designed to unleash hidden horsepower. Increased exhaust velocity adds power, driving excitement, fuel economy, and the distinctive BORLA Sound of Power respected by motoring enthusiasts everywhere. Each system is built from premium T-304 stainless steel, superior to T-400 series knockoffs (such as 409), to give you the absolute best in performance and durability. Ultra-smooth mandrel bends ensure maximum flow & power, and precision computer numerical control (CNC) manufacturing ensures an accurate fit. Best of all, BORLA stands behind every system with a Million-Mile Warranty. Just what you'd expect from the world's most experienced (and most winning) exhaust brand.

Features:

  • For Vehicles WITHOUT Active Exhaust
  • EXCEPT Convertible
  • Will NOT fit vehicles with O.E. mufflers with one tip per muffler unless valance is changed
  • 3" Diameter System contains a Merge X-Pipe
  • System features Polyphonic Harmonizer technology
  • Along with the distinctive Borla "Sound of Power" recognized by motoring enthusiasts everywhere, upgrading your ride with a Borla exhaust gives you a boost in power and torque, improved fuel economy, longer engine life and refined motorsport styling. But most of all, Borla gives you the intoxicating rush that comes with every squeeze of the throttle, the thrill of raging power with every shift, and a heart-pounding soundtrack to match. More than anything else, we understand that we build far more than exhaust systems. We build excitement.
    • Shipping Notes
    • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
    • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
    • Delivery to the USA:
    1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
    • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
    Exchange/Return Notes
    • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
    • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
    • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
    • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
    SKU: 42612726218

    Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

    Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

    4.7 ★★★★★
    Based on 24 reviews
    Sort
    Highest Rating
    Newest First
    Oldest First
    Product Reviews
    E
    Verified Purchase
    erika
    New York, US
    ★★★★★ 4
    They are good
    They were really good with nice flavor just not sour
    WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
    Reviewed in the United States on September 20, 2023
    P
    Verified Purchase
    paige alexander
    Houston, US
    ★★★★★ 5
    Tasty
    Yummy.
    WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
    Reviewed in the United States on May 7, 2026
    S
    Verified Purchase
    slimwriter
    Houston, US
    ★★★★★ 2
    Not sour
    Not really sour at all so it’s a pretty disappointing candy.
    WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
    Reviewed in the United States on May 6, 2026
    M
    Verified Purchase
    Moon Riley
    Carnegie, US
    ★★★★★ 5
    Sugar free
    Tastes great
    WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
    Reviewed in the United States on April 21, 2026
    M
    Verified Purchase
    Mr. Paul A. Ackermann
    San Leandro, US
    ★★★★★ 5
    Dude, it's not just a horror novel
    Format: Paperback
    This is to the previous reviewer (C. Scanlan). If this is just a horror novel, it failed miserably. It is not exactly a blood ’n gore thriller. Compared to Stephen King, it is pretty tame. What puts the horror in this book is that it is social commentary. Mary Shelly is not just trying to scare us. It is more than just a “Friday the 13th” movie. Mary Shelly is delivering a message. It seems that everyone understands this except this reviewer. There have been several different interpretations of the novel (see [...] for 10 different meanings of the novel). ICE takes the interpretation that Shelly is saying science can go too far. This is a perfectly valid interpretation. One can disagree with this interpretation but let’s not resort to name calling and personal attacks – that those who hold such an interpretation are doing a “low level attempt to cash in on home schooling Christian paranoia and fear of health care” or believe that “AIDS [is] the fruit of sin”. My wife and I are Catholic parents and we sent our children to public schools He mocks the idea of a secular fundamentalist but then demonstrates what that is. A religious fundamentalist sees anyone who disagrees with him as being of the devil. A secular fundamentalist sees anyone who disagrees with him as guilty of “brainwashing” others. In both cases, true dialogue is impossible. Another thing that a fundamentalist does is that he sees things in opposite extremes. If you are warning of the dangers of trusting too much in science then you must be against science. There is no middle ground for the fundamentalist. If you see that science can sometimes go too far then that means you are against health care. But this is a non-sequitur. Nielson writes “Frankenstein’s placing of the creation of life within the scientific method first destroys the unrepeatability and systematically eliminates the other elements [of hope, love, beauty, creativity and sacrifice]”. Nielson is not criticizing the scientific method in total. He is only criticizing it in the creation of life. The reviewer writes “He thereby easily and explicitly condemns the whole process and philosophy of the scientific method”. But Nielson is not condemning the whole process of the scientific method. He is only condemning it in the creation of life. The reviewer then mocks the credentials of the critics in the book - “So who are these essayists superior to Norton's and Oxfords and free of deconstructionist feminist secular fundamentalism, experts so august Ignatius should want them mentioned on their product page yet are nowhere to be seen?” But this game can be played both ways. What are the credentials of this reviewer? Is this reviewer so august as to challenge these essayists? Again, this is merely an ad-hominem attack. I really do not care who has the best credentials. What matters is who makes sense. Sometimes intellectuals can make the dumbest claims. Read Paul Johnson’s book, “Intellectuals” (http://www.amazon.com/Intellectuals-Marx-Tolstoy-Sartre-Chomsky/dp/0061253170/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1421862888&sr=8-1&keywords=intellectuals). He compares the essayists unfavorably to “good solid Roman Catholic moral theology” from the likes of Richard A. McCormick S.J., who “is the renowned leader of Roman Catholic Moral Theology in the field of bioethics in the USA.” He overlooks the fact that A. McCormick S.J. has dissented from teachings of the Popes Paul VI, John Paul II, and Benedict XVI over contraception. The “renowned leader” in the Catholic Church in morality is first and foremost the pope. Since Richard A. McCormick has contradicted the popes, he cannot be a good solid Catholic theologian. Mary Shelly lived right after the Enlightenment – man is the measure of all things. She lived at a time when people believed that science will solve all our problems. This is called scientism. ICE contends that Shelly is saying that we may be expecting too much from science. It does not mean that Shelly was saying that we should reject science. And it does not mean that Shelly believes that we should go back to the Catholic faith. In fact, ICE acknowledges that Shelly was an anti-Catholic. But the Church believes that the kernel of truth can be found in others, even in anti-Catholics. This is part of the Catholic tradition. St Augustine learned from Plato and St Aquinas learned from Aristotle. ICE would take that kernel of truth and expound that with the fullness of the Catholic faith. You may disagree with the Catholic faith, or with ICE looking at Shelly’s book from a Catholic perspective. But this is at least as a legitimate an interpretation as any other. In fact, this interpretation seems closer to the truth than the others. This interpretation is the traditional interpretation, which means that it goes back further to Shelly’s time than the modern interpretations, and is therefore less likely to be in error. BTW, the reviewer wrote that “Opus Dei right wing publishing (or reprint) house is selling this novel is to milk the home school market and to support its own bizarre bio-ethical ideology”. This is factually wrong. The company that publishes Opus Dei’s books is Sceptre. But the publisher of ICE is Ignatius Press.
    WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
    Reviewed in the United States on January 22, 2015

    recommand products

    Bando B144 Power King Classical
    22.51
    Joe Home Bar
    267.00
    Dortch Dining Side Chair
    108.00
    Keep Choppin Long Sleeve Tee
    40.00
    Brockway Extension Dining Table
    493.00