Pay in installments of $25.75 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 25 - Aug 30
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
少年來了【新裝紀念版】(韓江) 2024諾貝爾文學獎: : 518 BTS 2017Amazon 2017Malaparte Prize 2016 2014 400,000 1980515 1970199319992000200570 20102014201620172018 (1998) (2002)(2007)2010 (2011) 2014201220182000201220132021
作者: 韓江 | 譯者: 尹嘉玄
韓江繼榮獲 國際曼布克文學獎 的《素食者》後
引發全世界讀者共鳴，最殘酷的美麗傑作
◆
那些鼓起勇氣迎向軍隊的少年，
是在光州事件裡決定留下來的少年，
也是母親在518那夜帶不走的少年；
是那些代替我們赴義的少年，
也是至今仍像影子般穿梭在你我身邊的少年。
引發全世界讀者共鳴，最殘酷的美麗傑作
◆
那些鼓起勇氣迎向軍隊的少年，
是在光州事件裡決定留下來的少年，
也是母親在518那夜帶不走的少年；
是那些代替我們赴義的少年，
也是至今仍像影子般穿梭在你我身邊的少年。
「在尊嚴與暴力共存的世界，每個角落、每個世代，都很有可能出現下一個光州。」──韓江
■「BTS防彈少年團」金南俊感動推薦！
◎2017年美國Amazon書店百大選書
◎2017年榮獲義大利「馬拉帕蒂文學獎」（Malaparte Prize）
◎2016年英國衛報年度選書、愛爾蘭時報年度最佳小說
◎2014年榮獲韓國「萬海文學獎」
◎感動全世界讀者，韓國銷售400,000冊！
何撒娜（東吳大學社會學系助理教授）、房慧真（作家、記者）、黃子佼（多媒體跨界王）、陳又津（小說家）、陳雪（小說家）、陳慶德（韓國社會文化專家、《再寫韓國》作者）、劉梓潔（作家）◎一致推薦（依姓名筆畫序）
◆
◆很荒謬吧，拳頭怎麼可能贏得過槍呢？
1980年5月，韓國光州市民與學生組織示威遊行反抗全斗煥政權。15歲的少年東浩和朋友正戴，也一起參加了示威活動。當政府派軍隊進駐光州冷血鎮壓，軍人開始開槍射殺市民的時候，東浩害怕地逃走躲了起來，並且親眼目睹正戴被當街射殺。
東浩愧疚之餘，來道廳的尚武館找尋正戴屍體，遇到了負責處理遺體入殮的女高中生恩淑，以及年輕的女裁縫師善珠，受她們請求留下來幫忙，也因此認識了館內負責調配人力與物資的男大學生振秀。
在協助無名屍體登記的工作時，東浩不時對自己的懦弱感到自責。幾天後，軍方即將攻入道廳的那晚，東浩下定決心要堅守到最後……
◆到底為什麼他死了，我卻還活著？
因為處理過屍體、從此無法再吃肉的恩淑；在拘留所遭遇非人對待的大學生振秀；背負著入獄汙點、把自己封閉起來的善珠；未能即時勸說兒子東浩回家的母親，他們剩餘的人生從此都懷抱愧疚，懷念著那名鼓起勇氣迎向軍隊的少年……
【作者的話】
「我無法逃避這本小說」
「我帶著受罰的心情坐在書桌前」
「如果我不把它寫出來，就到不了任何地方。」
這本書不是為我個人而寫，我想將這本書獻給我的感覺、存在，以及在光州民眾抗爭中不幸身亡者、倖存者，還有罹難者家屬。……最終，不是我幫了他們，而是他們幫了我。我什麼事也沒做，只是寫了一本書而已。 ────韓江，義大利「馬拉帕蒂文學獎」得獎感言
本書特色
● 作家韓江出身光州，以父親的學生東浩為主角，蒐集資料、訪問生還者寫下的小說。
● 用小說家的眼光詮釋光州事件，探討當事者心理動機。透過不同的角色發聲，呈現出事件的殘忍、倖存者的無力與愧疚，人類內心的黑暗與暴力，以及良心、勇氣與希望。
作者
韓江 한강
1970年生，韓國文壇新生代暢銷女作家，是亞洲獲得國際曼布克文學獎的第一人。她畢業於延世大學國文系，現任韓國藝術大學文藝創作系教授，父親也是小說家。1993年，她在《文學與社會》季刊發表詩作，隔年以小說《紅錨》榮獲《首爾新聞報》的年度春季文學獎，開始進入文壇；1999年以作品《童佛》贏得「韓國小說文學獎」，2000年贏得「今日青年藝術家獎」，2005年，以中篇小說《胎記》榮獲「李箱文學獎」，成為史上第一位獲此文學大獎的「70後」作家。
2010年，她以《戰鬥氣息》榮獲韓國「東里文學獎」，2014年以《少年來了》榮獲韓國「萬海文學獎」，2016年《素食者》榮獲國際曼布克文學獎，2017年《少年來了》榮獲義大利「馬拉帕蒂文學獎」。2018年出版的《白》，是韓江結合自傳、富實驗性質的作品，再度入圍了國際曼布克文學獎決選，獲英國《衛報》選為「今日之書」。
著有長篇小說《黑鹿》 (1998)、 《你冰冷的手》 (2002)、《素食者》(2007)、《起風了，走吧》（2010）、《希臘語課》 (2011) 、《少年來了》（2014），小說集《麗水的愛情》（2012）、《白》（2018）、《植物妻子》（2000）、《火蠑螈》（2012）、詩集《將傍晚放入抽屜裡》（2013），以及2021年最新作品《永不告別》等。
譯者
尹嘉玄
韓國華僑，國立政治大學傳播學院畢業。曾任遊戲公司韓國主管隨行翻譯、出版社韓文編輯，現為書籍專職譯者，譯作涵蓋各領域。
韓江 한강
1970年生，韓國文壇新生代暢銷女作家，是亞洲獲得國際曼布克文學獎的第一人。她畢業於延世大學國文系，現任韓國藝術大學文藝創作系教授，父親也是小說家。1993年，她在《文學與社會》季刊發表詩作，隔年以小說《紅錨》榮獲《首爾新聞報》的年度春季文學獎，開始進入文壇；1999年以作品《童佛》贏得「韓國小說文學獎」，2000年贏得「今日青年藝術家獎」，2005年，以中篇小說《胎記》榮獲「李箱文學獎」，成為史上第一位獲此文學大獎的「70後」作家。
2010年，她以《戰鬥氣息》榮獲韓國「東里文學獎」，2014年以《少年來了》榮獲韓國「萬海文學獎」，2016年《素食者》榮獲國際曼布克文學獎，2017年《少年來了》榮獲義大利「馬拉帕蒂文學獎」。2018年出版的《白》，是韓江結合自傳、富實驗性質的作品，再度入圍了國際曼布克文學獎決選，獲英國《衛報》選為「今日之書」。
著有長篇小說《黑鹿》 (1998)、 《你冰冷的手》 (2002)、《素食者》(2007)、《起風了，走吧》（2010）、《希臘語課》 (2011) 、《少年來了》（2014），小說集《麗水的愛情》（2012）、《白》（2018）、《植物妻子》（2000）、《火蠑螈》（2012）、詩集《將傍晚放入抽屜裡》（2013），以及2021年最新作品《永不告別》等。
譯者
尹嘉玄
韓國華僑，國立政治大學傳播學院畢業。曾任遊戲公司韓國主管隨行翻譯、出版社韓文編輯，現為書籍專職譯者，譯作涵蓋各領域。
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.4 ★★★★★
Based on 16 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
The finest hour of William Friedkin
William Friedkin was undoubtedly one of the 1970s greatest and most influential directors. He only made 3 pictures during the decade, but all are landmark films. The first was The French Connection (1971), the film that won him his best director Oscar & the film won best picture. His next film, The Exorcist (1973) is probably his most famous/infamous & and it’s the only movie that’s still a truly terrifying experience, something to endure as much as to watch almost lol. Sorcerer (1977) was his 3rd and final film of the decade, and in spite of or perhaps even because of how it was a largely forgotten film for so long (after seeing it on cable nearly 30 years ago, it was a movie I simply could not track down until the release of this Blu-Ray) I really think in so many ways it ranks right along aside his first two 70s classics, and perhaps even surpasses those films in terms of pure audacity. The rope bridge scene is as intense as a set piece gets and is worth the price of admission all on its own, but the film as a whole is a clinic in lean, economical filmmaking. And the score by Tangerine Dream kicks serious a**. It might be because of his 70s trifecta Sorcerer is the only one that is still almost sort of like a “new film” too me, as I’ve only watched it maybe 3-4 times and have seen the other 2 dozens of times, but for my money Sorcerer is master filmmaker William Friedkin at the absolute peak of his powers.
MD2020 gives “Sorcerer” 5 out of 5 ⭐️s and says it’s a flawless action film and Friedkins best work.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 25, 2024
★★★★★ 4
A stylish, intimate remake of a French Classic
William Friedkin (The French Connection) brings us exotic locations and gripping story in Sorcerer, a remake of Henri-Georges Clouzot's 1953 thriller Wages of Fear.
The first hour of this movie seems to be comprised of random events involving four individuals that have absolutely nothing to do with each other. The only commonality is that they are all men of dubious character. Probably the most recognizable actor in this film is Roy Schieder, who plays a low level New York gangster participate in a robbery that goes bad, and forces him to flee the country due to the fact he managed to step on some pretty well connected toes. The second man, a French businessman, escapes from the threat of prosecution due to some shady business dealings. The third man, a Middle Eastern terrorist flees his captors after being caught participating in a bombing, and the fourth man is a shady assassin type apparently on the run from repercussion from his last hit.
The key is all four men end up in a South American rat-infested stink hole of a town called Vera Cruz. After awhile, they find their sanctuary has become more of a prison and all begin a desperate search for a way out, but that involves money, a commodity that's in short supply, with the only work available in the area is provided by an oil company that runs a well and is building a pipeline for the bubbling crude. Dangerous work, and the pay is so low that it would take years to earn enough to leave. Salvation for the men comes in a catastrophic disaster, an explosion damaging the well and causing the oil to burn.
The only way to close the well proper for repairs is to blow it up, and the only explosives available are 200 miles away. Turns out the explosives, sticks of nitro, haven't been tended very well, and, in turn, are highly unstable. The company decides to hire four men to drive two trucks to carry the dangerous materials through 200 miles of dangerous jungle, including prehistoric rope and wood bridges, treacherous mountain passes, deadly bandits and swampy roads laden with fallen trees. The suicide mission draws the four men, as the money would allow them to escape the oppressive town. The most intense scenes for me involved the men trying to traverse a rickety, rotting wooden rope suspension bridge over a raging river during a heavy rainstorm. There were times when the truck on the bridge was at such an angle, I thought it would flip right off. And all the actors performed most all their own stunts, adding to the realism of the movie. Do they make it? See the movie and find out. I especially liked the very end. A very nice touch that reminded me of an ending of a certain Alfred Hitchcock movie. Which one? I won't say, as it would give it away.
The movie runs just under two hours, and I would highly recommend it to anyone. Friedkin and the actors do a wonderful job in developing tensions between the characters and the environment and the between the characters themselves. The pacing is a bit slow, but it's deliberate, cranking the suspense up, notch by grueling notch.
There are sparse special features, including pretty thorough productions notes and a trailer. If you enjoy thrilling adventure, you will most likely like this movie. I would have happily given this movie five stars but it is only available in the full screen format. Something I didn't understand is the title for the movie. I wasn't able to figure out what it had to do with the movie....
Cookieman108
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 15, 2003
★★★★★ 5
Forgotten Classic
Sorcerer (1977) is, for the most part, a forgotten classic. First the forgotten: this film got kicked around by moviegoers when first released, probably because the title is misleading (nothing to do with fantasy), and they probably weren't in the mood for this film due to the sudden stratospheric success of another film that debuted at the same time (Star Wars). With Star Wars cementing the advent of the summer blockbuster, suddenly moviegoers wanted stuff more on the surface and eye candy for good measure. As a result, Sorcerer never got its footing, and was a major box office failure. If this film had debuted just a few years earlier, it would've done well, because it would've fit in with the other films of the time. The truth is that Sorcerer is an adaptation (not a remake) of The Wages of Fear from 1953. Now the classic: Sorcerer has since generated the respect it deserves, and is one of the best films of the 1970's. This film has it all: action, suspense, breathtaking and iconic scenes (the bridge scene being one), organic acting and a sort of 'raw' feel in terms of a lot of the settings; dwellings are dilapidated, and the machinery rusty. Even the actors are dirty, sweaty, and have visible wounds throughout the film. I particularly like the restraint on the dialogue, as Friedkin chooses to tell the story more in a visual sense. I also like the uniqueness of the characters being kept at a distance from the audience; this makes them sort of mysterious and seems to work in this film. This film was a very ambitious project, one that has been rewarded with the passage of time (thankfully). The care that went into many scenes and accompanying special effects are obvious, and first rate. Overall, Sorcerer is a must-see. This blu ray has excellent picture and sound quality, so it was worth the wait in that regard. One last thing: it's extremely rare for a blu ray disc to not include any special features; in the case of Sorcerer, it's unfortunately true. Perhaps this fact tells us just how much of a beating this film took over the years. I guess we should feel grateful that it has even made it onto blu ray.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 25, 2017
★★★★★ 5
Sorcerer (1977) (BD)
This is a different version, which can happen after the initial film with different editing and ending. I don't remember the political emphasis at all, and the ending of the other version was with Roy Scheider getting through the rough parts with his eyes glowing as he drove the truck alone, a real Sorcerer, after performing the miracle. This version continues after the completion to another ending altogether. I think both are great films, but each with a separate focus. This was all done without CGI which seems impossible. The scenes are still amazing and the camera work and editing top-notch.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 10, 2026
★★★★★ 3
Good but not Wages of Fear
The much maligned Sorcerer is in fact a good well crafted thriller that if seen without refrence to the Original Wages of Fear would have faired far better at the hands of the critics. That's not to say the film is perfect. The opening scenes that fill the viewer in on the charecters back stories, are pointless and actually work against the tension that is built up later in the film. Knowing exactly why the characters are desperate makes their reasons for taking on the deadly task seem a bit lame and looses the exestential angst that creates such a hopeless atmosphere.
Once in South America the oppresive nature of their stay in the village is also diminshed by knowing too much about them. Having said all that there is still an air of desperation and mounting frustration, it's just not as clausterphobic as it could have been. Once the journey begins the tension is turned on, the only problem is that by knowing the original so well there is not quite the frisson of that classic. This is an unfortunate by-product of re-making any well respected film. Friedkin however has a fair go and if this is the film you see first you will wonder why it was so slated on original release.
The film moves at a well constructed pace that is aided by a cracking score from Tangerine Dream. The cast perform well and Roy Scheider is reasonably well cast but does not deliver the subtly nuanced performance he is capable of, for this you need to look towards (obviously) Jaws and to a lesser extent the minor role he playes in Naked Lunch.
All in all a good film, though not great, and as the review starts by saying, not Wages Of Fear, but it deserves a better reputation than it so unfortunatly has and will be a good addition to anyones collection of interesting 70's films (the best decade for American Filmaking by a long long way).
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on September 29, 2005