SKU: 80791587013

Vertiv Liebert POD PD5 - (4) NEMA L6-20R| UPS Maintenance Bypass for GXT5 (PD5-006)

Sale price$290.39 Regular price$322.66
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $80.67 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 31 - Sep 5

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

Vertiv Liebert POD PD5 - (4) NEMA L6-20R| UPS Maintenance Bypass for GXT5 (PD5-006)The Vertiv Liebert POD PD5 006 is a purpose built Power Output Distribution (POD) unit with a built in maintenance bypass designed to work seamlessly with Liebert GXT5 UPS systems in the 5 10 kVA range. This versatile module bridges the gap between protection and accessibility, enabling technicians to service, test, and replace components on the UPS without interrupting power to critical loads. In data centers, server rooms, and edge deployments,

The Vertiv Liebert POD PD5-006 is a purpose-built Power Output Distribution (POD) unit with a built-in maintenance bypass designed to work seamlessly with Liebert GXT5 UPS systems in the 5-10 kVA range. This versatile module bridges the gap between protection and accessibility, enabling technicians to service, test, and replace components on the UPS without interrupting power to critical loads. In data centers, server rooms, and edge deployments, every minute of uptime matters, and the PD5-006 is engineered to minimize downtime while maximizing reliability. By integrating a dedicated bypass path, the POD PD5-006 ensures that essential equipment stays powered even when the UPS is undergoing maintenance, diagnostics, or battery replacements. This capability translates into tangible business benefits: reduced maintenance windows, improved service continuity, and cleaner power distribution that helps extend the life of your IT infrastructure.

Designed to work in concert with Liebert GXT5 5-10 kVA UPS configurations, the PD5-006 delivers a robust, industry-grade solution for mission-critical environments. The device’s compact footprint fits neatly into IT closets and equipment rooms, while its rugged steel enclosure provides the durability required for 24/7 operation. The built-in maintenance bypass path allows you to route power around the UPS briefly for maintenance tasks without depriving connected loads of power, a feature that is especially valuable in deployed environments where uninterrupted service is non-negotiable. The PD5-006 embraces a modular philosophy of data-center resilience: simplify maintenance, preserve uptime, and maintain a clear separation between the load distribution network and the UPS’s internal protection circuitry. In practice, this means easier service planning, safer maintenance procedures, and a more reliable overall power architecture.

Key benefits of the PD5-006 include improved serviceability and predictable power availability, especially during UPS battery swaps, firmware updates, or component replacement. The four NEMA L6-20R outlets provide sturdy, lockable connections for critical equipment, while the maintenance bypass ensures an uninterrupted supply of power to the critical loads even when the UPS needs attention. The Pod’s design considers real-world data-center demands — it is engineered to withstand the rigors of high-availability environments, featuring protective interlocks, built-in overload protection, and compatibility with standard installation practices used by qualified electrical professionals. Whether you are protecting data racks, network equipment, servers, or other sensitive hardware, the PD5-006 supports your operational goals by enabling safer, faster maintenance cycles with minimal impact on business operations.

From an SEO perspective, the PD5-006 exemplifies a best-in-class approach to UPS maintenance bypass components: it is specifically tailored for Liebert GXT5 systems, highlights the essential feature of a bypass path, and emphasizes the practical benefits of four NEMA L6-20R outlets for high-availability deployments. By focusing on reliability, compatibility, and ease of service, the product description highlights the most search-relevant attributes that IT professionals look for when selecting a maintenance bypass solution for their power distribution architecture. This approach helps drive qualified traffic to the product page, assists buyers in making informed decisions, and supports a smooth, confident purchasing experience for businesses aiming to minimize downtime and protect their investment in critical IT infrastructure.

  • The PD5-006 provides a built-in maintenance bypass, enabling UPS servicing without power interruption to connected loads, which dramatically reduces maintenance windows and minimizes operational risk in data centers and edge environments.
  • Four rugged NEMA L6-20R outlets deliver reliable 250V, 20A per outlet power distribution, supporting critical IT equipment with secure, code-compliant connections and ample headroom for typical rack-mounted devices.
  • Designed for seamless integration with Liebert GXT5 5-10 kVA UPS models, the POD PD5-006 ensures a safe, well-coordinated bypass path that preserves system availability during planned maintenance, firmware updates, or battery replacement tasks.
  • The enclosure is engineered for versatility and durability, offering a compact footprint suitable for tight IT closets or cabinet installations, with a sturdy steel body and mounting options that suit rack or stand-alone deployment.
  • Integrated protection features, straightforward installation, and compatibility with standard electrical safety practices provide a dependable, low-risk solution for uptime-critical environments, making the PD5-006 a compelling choice for data centers, telecom rooms, and enterprise IT spaces.

Technical Details of Vertiv Liebert POD PD5-006

  • Model: PD5-006
  • Product type: Power Output Distribution (POD) with built-in maintenance bypass
  • Compatibility: Liebert GXT5 UPS models in the 5-10 kVA range
  • Output connections: 4 x NEMA L6-20R outlets
  • Output rating: 20A per outlet (up to 80A total through the POD, depending on system configuration)
  • Nominal output voltage: 208-240 VAC (typical for North American 250V-rated L6-20R configurations)
  • Protection: integrated bypass path with protection interlocks and overload protection
  • Construction: robust steel enclosure designed for data center and IT room environments
  • Mounting: supports rack-mount or standalone installation in compliant enclosures or closets
  • Operating environment: suitable for standard data-center temperatures and humidity ranges (0–40°C typical, non-condensing)
  • Standards and certifications: designed to meet relevant industry safety and performance standards (UL/CE classifications typical for data center components)
  • Maintenance: hot-swappable and service-friendly design to simplify UPS maintenance tasks

how to install Vertiv Liebert POD PD5-006

  • Plan the installation location close to the Liebert GXT5 UPS and the critical load distribution path to minimize cabling complexity and maximize the effectiveness of the maintenance bypass.
  • Mount the POD PD5-006 in a suitable rack or on a stable chassis within the equipment room, ensuring there is adequate clearance for ventilation and cable routing.
  • Connect the PD5-006 input to the UPS output according to the Liebert GXT5 installation guide, following all local electrical codes and safety procedures. Ensure proper grounding and bonding to reduce potential fault currents.
  • Route four dedicated power feeds to the PD5-006’s NEMA L6-20R outlets and connect critical equipment to these outlets. Verify that each outlet is securely seated and that cords are properly rated for 20A use.
  • Enable and test the maintenance bypass function per the product manual, confirming that loads remain powered when the UPS is shut down for maintenance. Perform a controlled UPS test to verify transfer and bypass operations under load conditions.
  • Document the configuration, label all cables clearly, and schedule regular maintenance checks to ensure ongoing reliability and safety. Train facility staff or technicians on bypass procedures to minimize the risk of misoperation during future maintenance tasks.

Frequently asked questions

  • What is the purpose of the PD5-006? It is a Power Output Distribution unit with a built-in maintenance bypass designed for Liebert GXT5 UPS systems, enabling maintenance without interrupting power to critical loads.
  • How many outlets does the PD5-006 provide? It features four NEMA L6-20R outlets, each capable of delivering up to 20A at 250V, suitable for powering multiple critical devices from a single, centralized distribution point.
  • Is the PD5-006 compatible with Liebert GXT5 UPS models? Yes, it is specifically designed to work with Liebert GXT5 5-10 kVA UPS configurations, ensuring a safe and integrated bypass path for maintenance tasks.
  • Do I need a licensed electrician to install it? Installation should be performed by qualified personnel in accordance with local electrical codes and manufacturer guidelines to ensure safety and reliability.
  • What are the benefits of using a maintenance bypass POD? The maintenance bypass minimizes downtime during UPS servicing, preserves load power through the bypass path, and simplifies maintenance planning, ultimately improving overall data center uptime and serviceability.
Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 80791587013

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.2 ★★★★★
Based on 21 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
K
Verified Purchase
K. K.
Carnegie, US
★★★★★ 5
Classic holder keeps paper towels in place in a breeze.
Color: 06-bronze
This classic paper towel holder works perfectly. I had constantly unrolling paper towels in the breeze. This holder keeps everything in place now. So nice. Plus, it has a sleek, uncluttered design. I’m very pleased.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 18, 2026
T
Verified Purchase
Terry Anne
Pawtucket, US
★★★★★ 3
Only holds towels in place when it is full or 1/2 full
Color: 01-silver
If you are buying this for the feature of holding the paper towels in place so you can just rip one, I think you will be disappointed. Once the roll becomes smaller (and I tried changing the arm) the arm does not touch the towels. I do like the firm grip on the counter. My other dissatisfaction is the base gets water spots. Being near the sink this happens frequently. It does its job and is attractive.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 21, 2026
J
Verified Purchase
Jay
Houston, US
★★★★★ 5
Stylish
Color: 01-silver
Good sturdy stand for paper towels. Has small suction cups on bottom for stability. Good finish and good fit under the counter. Heavy base and not flimsy feeling. Brushed aluminum matched other appliances well.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 6, 2026
T
Verified Purchase
The product comes in multiple colors, but the function is terrible
Louisville, US
★★★★★ 5
Goodbye for the value
Color: 02-black
Great value looks wonderful very adorable
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 31, 2026
J
Verified Purchase
J. Thomas Campbell
Lake Worth, US
★★★★★ 5
David Rohl: A "Maverick" in Search of History
Format: Paperback
Recently I wrote a review of Peter Enns' book "The Evolution of Adam" in which I made a brief reference to David Rohl's "From Eden to Exile: The 5000 Year History of the People of the Bible." Several friends who read the review emailed me, curious about Rohl's book and encouraging me to follow up on Enns' book with a somewhat detailed review of From Eden to Exile. Hence...this review. From Eden to Exile is Rohl's own "follow-up" to his previous book "Pharaohs and Kings: A Biblical Quest." It's important here that I inform the reader of the following: (1) Pharaohs and Kings (in my view) is a far more compelling book than From Eden to Exile; and (2) I would strongly recommend that readers unfamiliar with Rohl read Pharaohs and Kings, prior to reading From Eden to Exile. With these thoughts in mind (and before commenting on Eden to Exile), I believe it will prove worthwhile to focus briefly on Rohl's Pharaohs and Kings prior to moving on to his second book - the two being closely related in terms of subject matter. First, it needs to be stated here at the outset that Rohl (unfortunately) has not received much in the way of either praise and/or encouragment from his fellow Egyptologists, most of whom see him as a sort of "reckless intruder" into the discipline, presenting arguments for a revised chronology (what Rohl refers to as "the New Chronology") that his critics appear to regard as little more than fanciful speculation. This is most unfortunate. Rohl's views are fully deserving of critical assessment; however, the casual (sometimes contemptuous) manner with which his views have been almost entirely dismissed hardly constitutes the "finest hour" in the discipline of ancient Egyptian studies - and this would include the oftentimes quite dismissive attitude of Kenneth A. Kitchen, an Egyptologist and conservative Christian who has written his own book on the subject:"On the Reliability of the Old Testament," Eerdmans, 2003. I clearly am no scholar on the history of ancient Egypt. On the other hand, I have been reading on the subject extensively now for more than 40 years - and this out of sheer love for the subject as opposed to academic profession. And one thing I have learned throughout this reading process is that ancient Egyptian chronology is - for a certainty - in some degree of chaos. (It's not all that difficult to locate comments to this effect from Egyptologists themselves). The standard reference guide for the chronology of ancient Egypt is based foundationally on a chronological history of the ancient pharaohs that dates all the way back to the writings of an Egyptian priest named Manetho, whose written account dates to the third century BC - not exactly what we normally consider "the latest available evidence." Furthermore, Manetho's account itself has not survived; what we do know of it is to be found in the writings of Josephus (first century AD), and the early church fathers Julius Africanus (third century AD) and Eusebius (fourth century AD). Indeed, Egyptian scholar (and conservative Christian) James K. Hoffmeier acknowledges as much in his recent book "Ancient Israel in Sinai" (Oxford, 2005) when he writes regarding Manetho's account: "It is widely acknowledged that names are garbled and that some of the dynasties are not sequential but contemporaneous, and that there are clearly legendary stories preserved... Nevertheless," he continues, "Manetho is taken seriously in historical studies." Indeed he is! Egyptologists have precious little more to go on from the ancient world other than Manetho's account. And yet it is somewhat astonishing to discover the extent to which Manetho's account has been (for the most part) dogmatized into a rigid system that appears to be unyielding. And it is against this rigid wall of Egyptological dogmatism that Rohl must butt his head. (Little wonder that he is not fondly regarded within the discipline). That being said, I would strongly caution all readers (and especially readers of the Old Testament, where a good deal of its chronology is tied directly to Manetho's modernized system) to regard this correlation - between OT chronology and Egyptian chronology - with some degree of appropriate caution. In fact, the very controversy over the date of the Exodus (13th century or 15th century) is related directly to the unbridled confusion surrounding ancient Egyptian chronology. As regards From Eden to Exile I would state the following: (1) Rohl's treatment of early Genesis (Adam to Abraham) is highly speculative and he appears to be connecting dots that were never intended to be contiguous; (2) his book takes on greater promise when he reaches the area of his own particular expertise: Joseph in Egypt. Rohl places Joseph firmly within the 12th dynasty, during the reign of pharaohs Senuseret III and Amenemhat III - and his arguments here (despite the standard protest from his fellow scholars) are highly compelling and fully deserving of something other than "we standard Egyptologists always know best!" (Quite frankly, I've reached the point where I believe a more positive - and more accurate! - understanding of ancient Egyptian chronology will have to await the work of younger scholars (and Rohl has plenty of them!) who are more willing to think outside the box by considering other possibilities. As so often happens, we must simply wait for the 'old guard' to retire so that younger scholars - with fresh ideas and a willingness to engage new evidence - can take their place.) And, finally (3); although much of From Eden to Exile is written in a style reminiscent of historical novels, this should not (in and of itself) cause the reader to think that all we have here is manufactured storyline. On the contrary (certainly beginning with Joseph), Rohl weaves his factual history into the unfolding story in such a way as to make the history not only real but filled with life and event. Furthermore, Rohl fully acknowledges in his Introduction that he will be telling a narrative story as he seeks to "fill in the gaps" where hard evidence from ancient historical sources is plain and simply unavailable. And because Rohl distances himself from any particular religious affiliation it means that both evangelicals and fundamentalists should be able to read his account to great profit, without becoming unduly disturbed by some of his conclusions (e.g., the first five chapters). Indeed, his astonishing defense of the historical integrity of the biblical account displays enormous objectivity, far surpassing (in many ways) various books on the subject that have been produced by Christian publishers throughout the past 25 years. I would like to conclude my comments here by strongly urging all evangelical OT scholars to thoroughly familiarize themselves with Rohl's writings - Pharaohs and Kings in particular. Despite his critics this book is entirely deserving of serious reflection. His defense of a 15th century date for the Exodus is (in my view...and the view of many others) highly compelling and by no means easy to dismiss. (I fully understand that most evangelical scholars opt for the later date of 1250 BC during the reign of Rameses II). One continues to wonder, however, why the reference to Rameses in Genesis 47:11 is so easily regarded as an anachronism while Exodus 1:11 somehow places one firmly within the reign of Rameses II. Or why the clear reference to 480 years in 1 Kings 6:1 is so easily dismissed as most likely merely symbolic as opposed to actual - this despite the additional support for a literal understanding of these years that one gets from Joshua 11:26. But then we already know why: standard Egyptian chronology places Rameses II in the mid-thirteenth century BC, all of which "harmonizes" so well with Exodus 1:11. Thus, ipso facto, the Exodus occurred @ 1250 BC. I find myself far more persuaded by Rohl's account of the Hyksos invasion of Egypt (very likely the Asiatic Amalakites of Exodus 17) following upon the Exodus, when Egypt was almost disemboweled and severely weakened by a God named Yahweh, then any other account of the Hyksos invasion I have ever read from any standard Egyptian historian. (By the way: a quick perusal of ten books in my own library on ancient Egypt displays an enormous amount of diversity and subjective opinion, a rather clear indication that (voices to the contrary) there is precious little overall harmony and understanding amongst the scholars themselves when dealing with numerous aspects of ancient Egypt and its pharaohs.) Perhaps all of Rohl's conclusions are entirely bogus. Nonetheless, the massive amount of information he offers the reader for serious consideration needs to be offset by responsible Egyptian historians who can demonstrate (clearly and persuasively) the error of his ways, and do so with strong and powerful evidence that will illustrate the point. (Ad hominen arguments are worthless as a retort.) I have yet to see such a detailed book (with good, solid evidence as opposed to preferred dogmatism) written in response to the growing body of historical evidence that Rohl and his staff of young investigators are busy compiling. This fact alone only raises more unsettling questions regarding the overall integrity of an Egyptian chronology that rests almost entirely and uncritically on a now lost document that dates back to several centuries before Christ. Rohl, via his own admission, is clearly outside the Christian faith...or any other faith. However, in terms of defending the historical integrity of scripture, he may well be the best friend any believer ever had. All the more, therefore, is the pity that OT scholars either have chosen to ignore him entirely...or (the more likely alternative) have never even heard of him. Hopefully...this will change in the very near future.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 21, 2012

recommand products