一起窺探這些貓咪友善的藝術風格
●古埃及
●拜占庭
●文藝復興
●洛可可
●印象派
●後印象派
●點描派
●象徵主義
●野獸派
●立體主義
●達達主義
●荷蘭風格主義
●魔幻寫實主義
●裝飾藝術風格
●超現實主義
●抽象表現主義
●眼鏡蛇藝術群
●普普藝術
●塗鴉藝術
Pay in installments of $29.75 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 31 - Sep 5
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
21隻貓貓看藝術史: : (Nia Gould) : 2121 21cosplay Nia Gould
作者: 黛安娜.沃爾斯、喬思琳.諾 | 繪者:妮雅.古德 (Nia Gould) | 譯者: 蘇文君
● 藝術知識型貓奴必買!各種風格貓咪帶你認識藝術史流派。
● 佛烈達卡羅喵、莫內喵、克林姆喵向你講解當時代藝術運動重要觀念
● 繁重藝術史知識喵式上手!
藝術史全面喵化!
用喵視角認識藝術史,
探索藝術史上重要的藝術流派。
本書透過21隻受到藝術史流派啟發的貓貓,帶你認識21種藝術流派的風格、主題、代表畫家、重要畫作,及其在藝術史上的位置。
從古埃及、拜占庭、文藝復興、抽象表現主義、超現實主義,到普普藝術、塗鴉義務等,21隻貓咪啟動全方位的cosplay能力,各自將一種藝術流派打扮於身,從面部、毛髮到身上的物件細節,再搭配上幽默風趣的解說,讓人能快速掌握藝術史的各種基本知識。
這絕對是熱愛貓貓與藝術的你最完美的藝術讀物!
(肉球擊掌)
插畫家Nia Gould是一名資深貓奴、藝術創作者。她結合對藝術史的認識和對貓咪的喜愛,創作出關於貓咪的藝術史作品,並以不同流派畫風呈現不同形象的貓咪。
當艱深的學術藝術史知識透過輕鬆的方式呈現,讓讀者們跟著繪畫與潛顯易懂的語言將歷史擺進腦海中,是理解藝術的嶄新方式。
各位鏟屎官們,千萬別錯過看見藝術化主子的機會,牠們絕對會「給你一些顏色瞧瞧」!
目錄
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.6 ★★★★★
Based on 27 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Muy buen producto
Color: Black, Size: 25-Feet
Muy buen producto 100% recomendado y a tiempo
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 14, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Direct Connection
Color: Black, Size: 25-Feet
Received the package in good condition. This wire is a decent quality. I made a set of jumper cables with it and they work excellent.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 24, 2026
★★★★★ 5
bought twice to make custom UPS setup battery leads, not disappointed
Color: Black, Size: 25-Feet
bought this item(25ft 2awg) twice, the first time I did was to create some quick connect cables between my batteries and my distribution block to my 4kw invertor(24v 165a peak calculated load)
I may have oversized due to knowing that the bigger you go the less you stress components and loose power to voltage drop
these cables are a nice high-grade rubber jacket and the 30awg strands are ideal for maximum flexibility while remaining fairly easy to terminate
this cable also includes a backer paper wrap that allows for easy stripping(of the rubber) without too much strand loss damage(from cutting too close to the core)
overall, would buy again, like I did, if I need larger runs(say for feeding an RV solar AC distribution panel) I would buy this brand again, in the 100ft range or so
THHN is not ideal for flex connections(strands are way too stiff) but a couple runs of welding cable like this inside something like "smurf tube" would be a perfect high-power temporary connection system, or just a way to isolate a large battery stack used for a solar setup
in fact I may do that someday, set up a pallet of LiFePO4 batteries with a large quick connect, and just recharge the massive array(s) at a secondary location where solar is more ideal(or other renewables)
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 5, 2024
★★★★★ 5
Custom wires for winch solenoid pack relocation.
Color: Black, Size: 25-Feet
Wire is nice. Flexible. Seems good. However the inner liner is not moisture blocking as I assumed from the pictures, it's paper.. still seems like a good price per foot.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 14, 2020
★★★★★ 4
Good, flexible (considering it's 2 GA) wire
Color: Black, Size: 20-Feet
Good, flexible (considering it's 2 GA) wire. Lugs soldered on well (using solder pot + flux). The only reason I didn't rate it 5 stars is because it's expensive. Made in USA was a +
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 22, 2017