Pay in installments of $34.44 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 20 - Jul 25
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
b71917 e t p4s ul fagTechnische Basisdaten Hersteller: FAG Synonym: 71917ACDGA P4A Gewicht: 530 Gramm Herstellungsland: Deutschland Schmierkanal: nicht vorhanden Schmierffnung Spannung: geringe Spannung Zolltarifnummer: 8482 1090 Erweiterte technische Daten ueres Breitenmae: mm 120,00 ueres Breitenmae: mm 18,00 E 25 Contact Angle Einzelgewicht in (kg): 0. 53 Innenmae: mm 85,00 P4S Boundary Dimensions ISO 4, Abec 7, Running Accuracy ISO 2, Abec 9 Paarung G Universelle
Technische Basisdaten
| Hersteller: FAG |
| Synonym: 71917ACDGA/P4A |
| Gewicht: 530 Gramm |
| Herstellungsland: Deutschland |
| Schmierkanal: nicht vorhanden Schmieröffnung |
| Spannung: geringe Spannung |
| Zolltarifnummer: 8482 1090 |
Erweiterte technische Daten
| Äußeres Breitenmaße: mm 120,00 |
| Äußeres Breitenmaße: mm 18,00 |
| E 25° Contact Angle |
| Einzelgewicht in (kg): 0.53 |
| Innenmaße: mm 85,00 |
| P4S Boundary Dimensions ISO 4, Abec-7, Running Accuracy ISO 2, Abec-9 |
| Paarung G – Universelle Paarung |
| Präzision P4S Präzision (Höher als P4) |
| T Textile Laminated Phenolic Resin, Outer Ring Guided. The Cage Is Suitable For Long-Term Operation At Temperatures Up To 100°C |
| UL Single Bearing, Universal, Light Preload |
| Abhebekraft leicht: 968 N |
| Abhebekraft schwer: 8.074 N |
| Abstand Druckkegelspitze: 32,9 mm |
| Anlagedurchmesser Wellenschulter Passung: h12 |
| Anlagedurchmesser Wellenschulter: 92 mm |
| Axiale Steifigkeit leicht: 184 N/µm |
| Axiale Steifigkeit schwer: 409 N/µm |
| Betriebstemperatur max.: 100 °C |
| Betriebstemperatur min.: -30 °C |
| C 0r 31.500 N Statische Tragzahl, radial |
| C r 44.500 N Dynamische Tragzahl, radial |
| C ur 3.300 N Ermüdungsgrenzbelastung, radial |
| Dynamische Tragzahl, radial: 44.500 N |
| E tk max 99,3 mm Maximaler Einspritzteilkreis |
| E tk min 95,9 mm Minimaler Einspritzteilkreis |
| E tk1 max 99,3 mm Maximaler Einspritzteilkreis |
| E tk1 min 95,9 mm Minimaler Einspritzteilkreis |
| Ermüdungsgrenzbelastung, radial: 3.300 N |
| F V H 2.609 N Vorspannkraft schwer |
| F V L 333 N Vorspannkraft leicht |
| K aE H 8.074 N Abhebekraft schwer |
| K aE L 968 N Abhebekraft leicht |
| Maximaler Einspritzteilkreis: 99,3 mm |
| Maximaler Freistichradius: 0,6 mm |
| Minimaler Einspritzteilkreis: 95,9 mm |
| Minimaler Kantenabstand: 1,1 mm |
| Statische Tragzahl, radial: 31.500 N |
| T max 100 °C Betriebstemperatur max. |
| T min -30 °C Betriebstemperatur min. |
| Vorspannkraft leicht: 333 N |
| Vorspannkraft schwer: 2.609 N |
| a 32,9 mm Abstand Druckkegelspitze |
| c a H 409 N/µm Axiale Steifigkeit schwer |
| c a L 184 N/µm Axiale Steifigkeit leicht |
| d =a 92 mm Anlagedurchmesser Wellenschulter |
| d =a h12 Anlagedurchmesser Wellenschulter Passung |
| r 1 min 1,1 mm Minimaler Kantenabstand |
| r a max 0,6 mm Maximaler Freistichradius |
| r a1 max 0,6 mm Maximaler Freistichradius |
| r min 1,1 mm Minimaler Kantenabstand |
| ≈m 0,544 kg Einzelgewicht |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.5 ★★★★★
Based on 10 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Love them!
Size: 3-Panel
It was funny to get together. Fun moments. My grandfather whom forgot to look down, stepped on it, slid, and did the splits.. there was a little smudge haha. But— its been a year and I still love them.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 4, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Great home office dividers!
Size: 3-Panel
Needed something to create a home office that would stand on an uneven basement floor. These are the perfect solution! No prying eyes and only took me an hour to put up both sets by myself, pretty easy. They are completely opaque.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on August 26, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Es fácil de armarlo y de utilizarlo adaptarlo a tu entorno
Size: 3-Panel, Size: 3-Panel
Es lo que necesitaba tal y cual como está en la foto
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 28, 2026
★★★★★ 4
Fine Simple Product, Works as Advertised
Size: 3-Panel
Performs as advertised, a simple upright divider. I use it to mark my "office" space when working from home.
Assembly was straightforward and well documented. One person can do it, but a second person can be helpful when sliding the fabric divider pieces onto their poles.
Part quality is fine for the price point. The only mild annoyance is that the upright poles can start getting loose from the metal feet, and need to be retightened occasionally (Allen wrench is included, keep it handy for retightening). It's fairly lightweight and easy to reposition, but the feet are heavy enough to keep it steady once placed.
All in all, a good product. I was pleased enough to buy a second one when my son wanted something to block sunlight from behind his computer desk.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on August 18, 2025
★★★★★ 1
Wobbly and Poor Design
Size: 1-Panel
Update: nope! Not worth the money. My cat simply brushed against the divider, and it fell, knocking breakable things over. Not safe!
It serves it's purpose, but...the screws were basically glued to the packaging. It took me longer to get the screws out of the packaging than it did to put it together.
The assembly was easy. I am not mechanically inclined by any means, but the instructions, despite being very hard to read (I have over 40 eyes), were pretty simple.
Structurally, it is very wobbly. I think they should have designed it with a middle rod to keep it more stable. I find that the attachments to the rods are wobbly and should have been screwed rather than popped into an attachment hole without reinforcement. That would have also made the room divider more stable.
I have cats, but the material is easy to clean. I took a damp cloth to it, and it came right off. As far as see-through...I think it does a great job of masking theO other side of the room.. I just wish it was a little longer and closer to the floor stand.
I like that it came with extra parts. It's just a very cheaply made item, and I don't think the price for the item reflects how cheaply it is made, how wobbly and unstable it is, or the poor design.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 15, 2025