Pay in installments of $24.88 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 11 - Aug 16
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
61817 2rz skfTechnische Basisdaten Hersteller: SKF Abdichtung: Abdichtung: beidseitig Berechnungsfaktor: f0: 13. 5 ueres Breitenma: 13 mm Abdichtung: beidseitig berhrungsfreie Abdichtung Ermdungsgrenzbelastung: 0. 88 kN Gewicht: 270 Gramm Grenzdrehzahl: 6 000 r min Herstellungsland: Frankreich Matoleranzen: Normal Minimallastfaktor: kr0. 015 Referenzdrehzahl: 12 000 r min Rundlauftoleranz: Normal Zolltarifnummer: 8482 1090 Erweiterte technische Daten 2RZ Ball
Technische Basisdaten
| Hersteller: SKF |
| Abdichtung: Abdichtung: beidseitig |
| Berechnungsfaktor: f0: 13.5 |
| Äußeres Breitenmaß: 13 mm |
| Abdichtung: beidseitig berührungsfreie Abdichtung |
| Ermüdungsgrenzbelastung: 0.88 kN |
| Gewicht: 270 Gramm |
| Grenzdrehzahl: 6 000 r/min |
| Herstellungsland: Frankreich |
| Maßtoleranzen: Normal |
| Minimallastfaktor: kr0.015 |
| Referenzdrehzahl: 12 000 r/min |
| Rundlauftoleranz: Normal |
| Zolltarifnummer: 8482 1090 |
Erweiterte technische Daten
| 2RZ Ball Bearing, With Low-Friction Seal At Both Sides. Seal Consists Of Sheet Steel Washer With Vulcanized Rubber |
| Äußeres Breitenmaße:(D) mm 110,00 |
| Äußeres Breitenmaße:(B) mm 13,00 |
| Einzelgewicht in (kg): 0.27 |
| Innenmaße:(d) mm 85,00 |
| Interne Radialluft Cn Normale Innenluft |
| Spezialbehandlung: Keine Spezialbehandlung |
| Wärmestabilisierung: Keine Wärmestabilisierung: - Temperaturen bis 120°C |
| 13 mm Äußeres Breitenmaß |
| Anzahl der Reihen 1 |
| Art der Abdichtung: Berührungsfrei |
| Beschichtung Ohne |
| Äußeres Breitenmaß 13 mm |
| Dynamische Tragzahl 19.5 kN |
| Dynamische Tragzahl: 19.5 kN |
| Einfüllnuten Ohne |
| Einzelgewicht 0.27 kg |
| Grenzdrehzahl 6 000 r/min |
| Nachschmierfunktion Ohne |
| Passungsanordnung Kein(e) |
| Referenzdrehzahl 12 000 r/min |
| Schmierstoff: Fett |
| Statische Tragzahl 16.6 kN |
| Statische Tragzahl: 16.6 kN |
| UNSPSC-Code 31171504 |
| eClass-Code 23-05-08-01 |
| max.93.1 mm Durchmesser der WelleKeine/ Nicht vorhandenlauffläche |
| min.1.9 mm Kantenabstand |
| min.89.6 mm Durchmesser der WelleKeine/ Nicht vorhandenlauffläche |
| ≈104.3 mm Eindrehungsdurchmesser |
| ≈93.3 mm Schulterdurchmesser |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.2 ★★★★★
Based on 18 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 2
Flaky and Doesn't Handle Moisture Well
Size: 36 PACK
The plates have a tiny amount of twist in the center and quite a bit of doming when flexed. While the outer edges are entirely floppy. Most of the center is smooth, but there are rough patches that flake off paper pieces when rubbed with a spoon or from a lot of moisture from food. The flat surface (not the inner walls) was able to withstand still water for about 10 minutes before weakening, so I wouldn't use it for wet or very moist foods.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 28, 2026
★★★★★ 2
Thinner Than Chinet, Far More Expensive
Size: 12 PACK
These platters are about the same size and shape as Chinet platters and are reminiscent of them in construction and form. However, these plates are about half as thick as a Chinet and at $10 for just 12 plates, that makes them FAR more expensive than Chinet which a 30-pack of their platters can be had for less than $7. So no, I won't be getting any more of these much thinner, much more expensive plates when Chinet offers a product that's usually sturdier than you need for far less than these platters. If they were cheaper than Chinet by a fair amount I'd have given them 5 stars as they're thick enough for most uses and thumbs up for compostability, but I have to call out the overpriced nature of them.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 16, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Quality
Size: 10 in-100 count
Perfect
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 31, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Need to buy
Size: 12 in-100 count
Good for heavy food
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 9, 2026
★★★★★ 4
Pllates
Size: 12 in-180 count
They’re too flimsy
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 28, 2026