Pay in installments of $3.52 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 12 - Aug 17
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
Tints Of Nature 2N zeer donkerbruin 1.00 SetTints Of Nature 2N zeer donkerbruin Tints of Nature is de eerste en enige lijn van langdurige permanente haarverf op de huidige markt die gecertificeerde organische ingredinten bevat die geproduceerd zijn middels het gebruik van een geavanceerde formule met natuurlijke ingredinten om al het grijze haar te dekken. Onze unieke mix van natuurlijke extracten en Vitamine E & C, gecombineerd met van planten afkomstige conditioners zullen daadwerkelijk het
Tints Of Nature 2N zeer donkerbruinTints of Nature is de eerste en enige lijn van langdurige permanente haarverf op de huidige markt die gecertificeerde organische ingrediënten bevat die geproduceerd zijn middels het gebruik van een geavanceerde formule met natuurlijke ingrediënten om al het grijze haar te dekken. Onze unieke mix van natuurlijke extracten en Vitamine E & C, gecombineerd met van planten afkomstige conditioners zullen daadwerkelijk het haar versterken, beschermen en bevochtigen terwijl u uw haar kleurt.
- Dermatologisch getest
- Vrij van ammonia, parabenen, gluten en propylene glycol
- Langdurige, schadevrije permanente haarkleur
Werkzame bestanddelen
Colour gel: PEG-2 Soyamine, Aqua, Aloe barbadensis (aloe) leaf extract*, PEG-4 Rapeseedamide, Alcohol denat*, Propanediol**, Oleic acid, Ethanolamine, Parfum, Hydrolyzed Wheat protein**, p-Phenylenediamine, 4-Chlororesorcinol, Sodium sulphite, Sodium hydrosulphite, Tetrasodium glutamate diacetate, Ascorbic acid, 2-Amino-4-Hydroxyethylaminoanisole sulfate, PEG-7 Glyceryl cocoate, Symphytum officinale (comfrey) leaf extract*, *Citrus aurantium dulcis (orange) peel extract, *Citrus grandis (grapefruit) fruit extract, N-phenyl--phenylenediamine sulfate, 4-Amino-2-hydroxytoluene, m-aminophenol, tocopherol Colourfix: Aqua, Anthemis nobilis (chamomile) flower extract*, Hydrogen peroxide, Phenoxyethanol, Benzyl alcohol, Potassium sorbate, Tocopherol, Etidronic acid, Polyquaternium-10. Clarifying shampoo: Aqua, Aloe barbadensis (aloe) leaf extract*, Sodium C14-16 Olefin sulfonate, Cocamidopropyl betaine**, Sodium cocoamphoacetate, Disodium cocamphodiacetate, PEG-120 Methyl glucose dioleate, Glyceryl laurate**, Sodium sulfite, Phenoxyethanol, PEG-7 Glyceryl cocoate, Urea, Parfum natural, Tetrasodium glutamate diacetate, Ethylhexylglycerin, Citric acid, Citrus grandis (grapefruit) fruit extract* Tints of Nature shampoo: Aqua, Cocamidopropyl betaine, Sodium cocoamphoacetate, Lauryl glucoside**, Glycerin**, PEG-120 Methyl glucose dioleate, Glyceryl laurate, Sodium cocoyl glutamate**, Sodium lauryl glucose carboxylate, Polyglyceryl-4-caprate, Panthenol, Coco-glucoside**, Glyceryl oleate**, Phenoxyethanol, Citric acid, Benzyl alcohol**, Parfum natural, Hydrolyzed wheat protein**, Helianthus annuus (sunflower) seed extract*, Aloe barbadensis (aloe) leaf extract*, Camellia sinensis (green tea) leaf extract*, Calendula officinalis ((marigold) flower extract*, Ethylhexylglycerin, Salicylic acid**, Anthemis nobilis (chamomile) flower extract*, Sodium phytate**, Sorbic acid**, Avena strigosa (black oat) seed extract*, Lecithin** Conditioner: Aqua, Polyglyceryl-10 stearate, Cetyl alcohol**, Helianthus annuus (sunflower) seed oil*, Stearyl alcohol**, Prunus amygdalus dulcis (sweet almond) oil*, Panthenol, Glycerin**, Butyrospermum parkii (shea) butter*, Parfum natural, Phenoxyethanol, Benzyl alcohol, Simmondsia chinensis (jojoba) seed oil*, Hydrolyzed wheat protein*, Citric acid, Calendula officinalis (marigold) flower extract*, Camellia sinensis (green tea) leaf extract*, Potassium sorbate, Xanthan gum**, Symphytum officinale (comfrey) leaf extract, Tocopherol, Aloe barbadensis leaf extract*, Anthemis nobilis (chamomile) flower extract*, Avena strigosa (black oat) seed extract*, Lecithin** * Soil association organic standard ** Natural & organic standard
Waarschuwingen
We willen je niet afschrikken, maar het is belangrijk dat je weet dat haarkleurmiddelen ernstige allergische reacties kunnen veroorzaken.
Lees de veiligheidsinstructies en volg zorgvuldig de gebruiksaanwijzingen.
Voer 48 uur voordat je je haar kleurt een huidgevoeligheidstest uit.
Zelfds indien je een gevoeligheidstest uitvoert, kan je nog steeds een allergische reacties ervaren wanneer je je haar kleurt. Helaas is de gevoeligheidstest geen garantie om toekomstige allergische reacties te vermijden.
Indien je tijdelijke "zwarte henna" tatoos hebt, kunnen deze je risico op een allergische reactie op haarkleurmiddelen verhogen.
Dit product is niet bedoeld voor gebruikt op personen jonger dan 16 jaar.
Gelieve je haar niet te kleuren indien:
- je uitslag hebt in je gezich tof een gevoelige, geïrriteerde of beschadigde hoofdhuid hebt.
- indien je ooit een reactie hebt ervaren na het kleuren van je haar.
- je in het verleden een reactie hebt ervaren op een tijdelijke "zwarte henna" tattoo.
Dit product bevat fenyleendiamine (PPD). Bevat waterstofperoxide.
En tot slot:
Niet gebruiken voor het kleuren van wimpers en wenkbrauwen. Geschikte handschoenen dragen. Het haar goed spoelen na gebruik. Contact met oren en aangezicht vermijden. Contact met de ogen vermijden. Bij contact met de ogen onmiddellijk uitspoelen. Als irritatie blijft voortduren, zoek medische hulp. Schroef de punt van het applicatorflesje onmiddellijk los na het mixen om te vermijden dat de fles barst en het product schade veroorzaakt wanneer het uit het flesje stroomt. Gemengde kleur kan niet bewaard worden.
Uitsluitend voor uitwendig gebruik.
Zoek medische hulp op indien je jeuk, een branderig gevoel, uitslag of en allergische reactie ondervindt. Neem contact op met de fabrikant en/of de desbetreffende nationale autoriteit indien je allergische en/of andere reacties ondervindt.
Voordat je aan de slag gaat:
Huidgevoeligheidstest
Hoewel deze haarkleuring een zeer, zeer zachte formule heeft voor het haar en de huid, dien je steeds 48 uur voor gebruik een gevoeligheidstest uit te voeren.
Voor het testen hoef je de Colour Gel en Colourfix niet te mixen.
Was en droog een klein stukje huid: de binnenkant van je elleboog is een goede plek. Wrijf een klein beetje colour gel op je fris gewassen en gedroogde huid. Wanneer je verschillende kleuren samen gebruikt, dien je de donkerste kleur te gebruiken (of het laagste nummer).
Zodra de colour gel gedroogd is kan je er een pleister over kleven of onbedekt laten. Indien je een reactie ziet (roodheid, pijn, irritatie of een branderig gevoel) dien je het testgebied van je huid onmiddellijk te spoelen.
Na 2 uur de rest van de colour gel afspoelen en het testgebied de volgende 48 uur nauwkeurig in de gaten houden en letten op een mogelijk reactie.
Indien je een reactie ondervindt mag je het product niet op je haar gebruiken en indien je huid verder pijnlijk en geïrriteerd aanvoelt dien je een arts of apotheker te raadplegen voor een medisch advies
Bewaaradvies
Buiten bereik van kinderen houden. Op een koele plaats uit de buurt van licht of warmte bewaren. Bewaar de verpakking een aantal dagen voor het geval dat je een reactie ondervindt.
Verantwoordelijk voor het in de handel brengen
Nateeko Products BV
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.3 ★★★★★
Based on 15 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
An interesting look at capitalism in the US
Format: Hardcover
Seller:
Product arrived on time in good condition. No issues with the seller at all!
Book:
This is a pretty dense history of the US through the lense of capitalism. There are quite a few editing errors (typos, incorrect quotation formatting, etc) that are speed bumps to the flow of this book but don’t ruin the reading experience.
There are also a few moments where a subjective claim is made using a historical event as a backdrop, but the claim isn’t elaborated on as well as it could be. I chalk this up to the focus of the book being on history and not economics, but I do think if a claim is made it would be interesting to have more data as to why the claim was made.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 5, 2023
★★★★★ 4
Marx had the proletariat, Mao had the farmers, America has the owners of financial capital
Format: Kindle
What makes Jonathan Levy’s book so informative is that it is truly a parallel history of its politics and its economics. And only by viewing these two intertwined paths side by side can you truly understand the myth of the American free market.
America’s politics and its economics have never, since the country’s founding, been separated. The state has been an integral part of everything economic to an extent that would make the most rabid socialist gasp in horror. The only difference is that while the Marxist state stood side by side with the proletariat, and Mao built the number two economy in the world on the support of farmers, America built its economic marvel on the backs of, and for the benefit of, the owners of financial capital.
That’s not all bad, mind you. It takes workers, farmers, and the owners of capital to build a modern economy. The tension comes when there is a lack of balance between the importance the state attaches to each.
And there can be little surprise that America’s politicians have put the owners of financial capital at the top of their list of priorities. Politicians, after all, can do nothing without power, and power comes via the electoral process, a process that is today fueled by obscene amounts of money. And who has all that money?
The American economic narrative is a misleading tale of meritocracy and free markets. The Horatio Alger-based myth is that you are only limited by your skills and your ambition. And like most enduring myths there is a thread of truth to it. Many successful people truly deserve what they have achieved.
But does anyone really possess $150 billion of personal merit? Can we statistically accept that the wealthiest nation in the world is also one of the most financially unequal without seeing a pattern of bias?
Perhaps the most selectively quoted book in history is Adam Smith’s “Wealth of Nations”, published, strangely enough, in 1776. Often credited with being the father of capitalism, Smith argued that markets free of excessive regulation would be more efficient than markets that were overly regulated, although Smith “made no categorical separation between the political and the economic, or state and market.”
Smith did, however, warn against the socially destructive power of monopolies, which unregulated markets will not protect against, and he correctly predicted that the excessive division of labor would lead to a degree of labor and wealth inequity that would destroy society.
At the time when US Steel, General Electric, and General Motors, among many others, were the power behind America’s global economic hegemony, most Americans earned a living through wages. And those wages were made possible by long term fixed investments that created jobs.
They were generally big bets that took a long time to earn a return but that aligned with the jobs-first priorities of most companies. (Employees first, communities second, shareholders a distant third.) And while not every employee enjoyed the same salary, the differences between the top earners and the average earners was a fraction of what it is today.
That era, of course, is long over. The current economy is geared toward the creation of wealth through the short-term investment in assets that will appreciate rapidly and are highly liquid. At the moment that is the stock market and synthetic financial tools pedaled by hedge funds, banks, and the like.
The problem is that the wage market encompassed much of America. The asset appreciation market encompasses only a tiny sliver of the richest among us. There is spillover, of course. The lawyers, analysts, consultants, bankers, and sales people who serve the asset appreciation market are doing quite well. But the man or woman who has less education and who might have made a decent living in a steel mill or car assembly plant, has lost out. And despite what the politicians will tell you, the gap is getting wider.
(I spent a career in corporate industry, have a college degree in economics, have been a CEO, and have served on four public company boards. I know enough to know that Levy knows what he’s talking about.)
The second important point to come out of all this is that economics is not really a “science” as most people think of that term. There is a shared jargon and there are commonly accepted principles. The very idea that there is an economy that is distinct from all other aspects of human existence, including the state, however, is a relatively recent concept.
The weakness of the distinction, in fact, is clearly demonstrated by the remarkable reality of just how diverse the history of the American economy is. The sun doesn’t always rise in the east in the world of economics. In each of the economic eras Levy describes it is stunning how few people actually formulated the thinking that defined them.
I will join some of the other reviewers in suggesting that the author could have spent more time explaining some of the jargon inevitably found in a treatise on economics. The layman obviously wasn’t his target audience but the book, I believe, could have read more smoothly and been much, much shorter. (The editor and publisher have to take some of the blame for this.)
Even if you have to slog your way through the more tedious sections on global capital flows and such, however, you’ll get something from the book even if you’ve never set foot in an economics classroom. If you get no more than the fact that the free market is a myth and that most long term capital that actually creates jobs and income for the average American is actually provided by you, the taxpayer, not the Wall Street capitalist, you will better understand why there is so much division in our country right now.
We don’t have a democratic economy. The young wonders of Silicon Valley would have nothing if it wasn’t for your tax dollars and your pension plan, if you’re still lucky enough to have one.
We can do better. We have to. The economic inequity we have now is simply not sustainable.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on August 19, 2022
★★★★★ 5
Good value for the money.
Format: Hardcover
Book in excellent condition, delivered promptly.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 20, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Great read.
Format: Paperback
Gives a great perspective of how technology has developed and shaped the economy.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 21, 2024
★★★★★ 5
How Capitalism Shaped America
Format: Hardcover
Very impressive analysis. Unfortunately the author ended his analysis in 2010. Wish he had offered some thoughts on what should be done as opposed to what is being done in this age of economic chaos.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on August 19, 2021