SKU: 17490231974

COMP Cams Die Cast Valve Cover Set SBf W

Sale price$161.10 Regular price$179.00
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $44.75 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 14 - Aug 19

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

COMP Cams Die Cast Valve Cover Set SBf WManufactured and packaged in the U. S. A., this new line of powder coated die cast aluminum valve covers will offer you a sleek, high performance look combined with rigid durability and unmatched reliability. They are a perfect addition to any high performance engine. These valve covers are perimeter bolt style and include two chrome breathers with laser etched logos, two black rubber grommets and installed baffles. The installed baffles are welded in

Manufactured and packaged in the U.S.A., this new line of powder coated die cast aluminum valve covers will offer you a sleek, high performance look combined with rigid durability and unmatched reliability. They are a perfect addition to any high performance engine. These valve covers are perimeter bolt style and include two chrome breathers with laser etched logos, two black rubber grommets and installed baffles. The installed baffles are welded in place to ensure no oil enters the breathers. The chrome breathers are present on both valve covers which allow for proper crankcase ventilation. In addition, these covers were designed to be tall enough to provide the necessary clearance to accommodate aftermarket valve trains. Gaskets are not included.

This Part Fits:

Year Make Model Submodel
1966-1972,1974 Ford Bronco Base
1975-1987 Ford Bronco Custom
1985-1987 Ford Bronco Eddie Bauer
1975,1978 Ford Bronco Northland
1975 Ford Bronco Ranger
1978-1981 Ford Bronco Ranger XLT
1968-1969 Ford Bronco Roadster
1975-1977 Ford Bronco Sport
1968-1973 Ford Bronco Wagon
1982-1983 Ford Bronco XLS
1984-1987 Ford Bronco XLT
1982-1983 Ford Bronco XLT Lariat
1963-1974 Ford Country Sedan Base
1963-1974 Ford Country Squire Base
1965-1972 Ford Custom Base
1964-1977 Ford Custom 500 Base
1969-1982 Ford E-100 Econoline Base
1975-1982 Ford E-100 Econoline Chateau
1969-1974 Ford E-100 Econoline Club Wagon
1975-1983 Ford E-100 Econoline Custom
1975-1978 Ford E-100 Econoline Northland
1983 Ford E-100 Econoline XL
1975-1982 Ford E-100 Econoline Club Wagon Base
1975-1982 Ford E-100 Econoline Club Wagon Chateau
1975-1983 Ford E-100 Econoline Club Wagon Custom
1975-1978 Ford E-100 Econoline Club Wagon Northland
1983 Ford E-100 Econoline Club Wagon XL
1975-1982,1984-1986 Ford E-150 Econoline Base
1975-1982 Ford E-150 Econoline Chateau
1975-1983,1987 Ford E-150 Econoline Custom
1975-1978 Ford E-150 Econoline Northland
1983-1987 Ford E-150 Econoline XL
1975-1982,1984-1986 Ford E-150 Econoline Club Wagon Base
1975-1982 Ford E-150 Econoline Club Wagon Chateau
1975-1983,1987 Ford E-150 Econoline Club Wagon Custom
1975-1978 Ford E-150 Econoline Club Wagon Northland
1983-1987 Ford E-150 Econoline Club Wagon XL
1984-1987 Ford E-150 Econoline Club Wagon XLT
1969-1974 Ford E-200 Econoline Base
1971-1972 Ford E-200 Econoline Chateau Wagon
1969-1974 Ford E-200 Econoline Club Wagon
1970-1974 Ford E-200 Econoline Custom Wagon
1975-1982,1984-1986 Ford E-250 Econoline Base
1975-1982 Ford E-250 Econoline Chateau
1975-1983,1987 Ford E-250 Econoline Custom
1975-1978 Ford E-250 Econoline Northland
1983-1987 Ford E-250 Econoline XL
1975-1982,1984-1986 Ford E-250 Econoline Club Wagon Base
1975-1982 Ford E-250 Econoline Club Wagon Chateau
1975-1983,1987 Ford E-250 Econoline Club Wagon Custom
1975-1978 Ford E-250 Econoline Club Wagon Northland
1983-1987 Ford E-250 Econoline Club Wagon XL
1984-1987 Ford E-250 Econoline Club Wagon XLT
1969-1974 Ford E-300 Econoline Base
1970-1974 Ford E-300 Econoline Chateau Wagon
1969-1974 Ford E-300 Econoline Club Wagon
1971-1972 Ford E-300 Econoline Custom Wagon
1975-1982,1984-1986 Ford E-350 Econoline Base
1975-1982 Ford E-350 Econoline Chateau
1975-1983,1987 Ford E-350 Econoline Custom
1975-1978 Ford E-350 Econoline Northland
1983-1987 Ford E-350 Econoline XL
1977-1982,1984-1986 Ford E-350 Econoline Club Wagon Base
1977-1982 Ford E-350 Econoline Club Wagon Chateau
1977-1983,1987 Ford E-350 Econoline Club Wagon Custom
1977-1978 Ford E-350 Econoline Club Wagon Northland
1983-1987 Ford E-350 Econoline Club Wagon XL
1984-1987 Ford E-350 Econoline Club Wagon XLT
1975-1976 Ford Elite Base
1976-1978,1983 Ford F-100 Base
1975-1982 Ford F-100 Custom
1975-1978 Ford F-100 Northland
1975-1981 Ford F-100 Ranger
1978-1981 Ford F-100 Ranger Lariat
1975-1981 Ford F-100 Ranger XLT
1982-1983 Ford F-100 XL
1982-1983 Ford F-100 XLS
1977 Ford F-100 XLT
1982-1983 Ford F-100 XLT Lariat
1976-1978,1983-1986 Ford F-150 Base
1975-1982,1987 Ford F-150 Custom
1975-1978 Ford F-150 Northland
1975-1981 Ford F-150 Ranger
1978-1981 Ford F-150 Ranger Lariat
1975-1981 Ford F-150 Ranger XLT
1982-1987 Ford F-150 XL
1982-1983 Ford F-150 XLS
1977,1983-1984 Ford F-150 XLT
1982,1985-1987 Ford F-150 XLT Lariat
1976-1978,1983-1986 Ford F-250 Base
1975-1982,1987 Ford F-250 Custom
1975-1978 Ford F-250 Northland
1975-1981 Ford F-250 Ranger
1978-1981 Ford F-250 Ranger Lariat
1975-1981 Ford F-250 Ranger XLT
1982-1987 Ford F-250 XL
1982-1983 Ford F-250 XLS
1977,1983-1984 Ford F-250 XLT
1982,1985-1987 Ford F-250 XLT Lariat
1976-1978,1983-1986 Ford F-350 Base
1975-1982,1987 Ford F-350 Custom
1975-1978 Ford F-350 Northland
1975-1981 Ford F-350 Ranger
1978-1981 Ford F-350 Ranger Lariat
1975-1981 Ford F-350 Ranger XLT
1982-1987 Ford F-350 XL
1982-1983 Ford F-350 XLS
1977,1983-1984 Ford F-350 XLT
1982,1985-1987 Ford F-350 XLT Lariat
1963-1970 Ford Fairlane 500
1966-1967 Ford Fairlane 500XL
1963-1969 Ford Fairlane Base
1978-1979 Ford Fairmont Base
1978-1979 Ford Fairmont Futura
1964-1970 Ford Falcon Base
1964-1970 Ford Falcon Futura
1964-1965 Ford Falcon Futura Sprint
1965 Ford Falcon Sedan Delivery Base
1963-1967 Ford Galaxie Base
1963-1974 Ford Galaxie 500 Base
1963 Ford Galaxie 500 Sunliner
1963 Ford Galaxie 500 Victoria
1963-1970 Ford Galaxie 500 XL
1972-1976 Ford Gran Torino Base
1973-1976 Ford Gran Torino Brougham
1974-1975 Ford Gran Torino Elite
1972-1975 Ford Gran Torino Sport
1972-1976 Ford Gran Torino Squire
1975-1980 Ford Granada Base
1978-1980 Ford Granada ESS
1975-1980 Ford Granada Ghia
1966-1969 Ford GT40 MK III
1965-1982,1984-1985 Ford LTD Base
1970-1976,1984-1985 Ford LTD Brougham
1979-1986 Ford LTD Country Squire
1986 Ford LTD Country Squire LX
1980-1986 Ford LTD Crown Victoria
1986 Ford LTD Crown Victoria LX
1975-1979 Ford LTD Landau
1985 Ford LTD LX Brougham
1980-1982 Ford LTD S
1987-1991 Ford LTD Crown Victoria Base
1977-1979 Ford LTD II Base
1977-1978 Ford LTD II Brougham
1979 Ford LTD II Landau
1977-1979 Ford LTD II S
1977 Ford LTD II Squire
1971-1977 Ford Maverick Base
1975-1977 Ford Maverick Grabber
1964-1973,1979 Ford Mustang Base
1969-1971 Ford Mustang Boss 302
1979 Ford Mustang Ghia
1982 Ford Mustang GL
1982 Ford Mustang GLX
1970-1973 Ford Mustang Grande
1982-1985 Ford Mustang GT
1984 Ford Mustang GT-350 20th Anniversary
1982,1984 Ford Mustang L
1984-1985 Ford Mustang LX
1970-1973 Ford Mustang Mach 1
1965-1970 Ford Mustang Shelby GT-350
1966 Ford Mustang Shelby GT-350H
1975-1978 Ford Mustang II Base
1975-1978 Ford Mustang II Ghia
1975-1978 Ford Mustang II Mach 1
1963-1974 Ford Ranch Wagon Base
1970 Ford Ranch Wagon Police Cruiser
1967-1979 Ford Ranchero 500
1967 Ford Ranchero 500 XL
1965-1971 Ford Ranchero Base
1966 Ford Ranchero Custom
1968-1979 Ford Ranchero GT
1970-1979 Ford Ranchero Squire
1977-1981 Ford Thunderbird Base
1978 Ford Thunderbird Diamond Jubilee
1979,1981 Ford Thunderbird Heritage
1980 Ford Thunderbird Silver Anniversary
1978-1981 Ford Thunderbird Town Landau
1971 Ford Torino 500
1968-1976 Ford Torino Base
1970-1971 Ford Torino Brougham
1968-1971 Ford Torino GT
1969-1971 Ford Torino Squire
1980,1982 Lincoln Continental Base
1982 Lincoln Continental Givenchy
1982 Lincoln Continental Signature
1980 Lincoln Mark VI Base
1977-1980 Lincoln Versailles Base
1964-1967 Mercury Caliente Base
1979 Mercury Capri Base
1979 Mercury Capri Ghia
1982-1985 Mercury Capri RS
1971 Mercury Colony Park Base
1964-1969,1971-1977 Mercury Comet Base
1967 Mercury Commuter Base
1967-1970,1977-1979 Mercury Cougar Base
1969 Mercury Cougar Boss 302
1977 Mercury Cougar Brougham
1977 Mercury Cougar Villager
1967-1970,1974-1981 Mercury Cougar XR-7
Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 17490231974

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.6 ★★★★★
Based on 14 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
J
Verified Purchase
John Klinger
Louisville, US
★★★★★ 5
A must read
Format: Paperback
Great book! Show what you should eat to help yourself. Everyone should read this book.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 30, 2026
D
Verified Purchase
Dark Angel
Boise, US
★★★★★ 4
Worthwhile Read
Format: Hardcover
Extremely insightful.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 11, 2026
W
Verified Purchase
William Echols
Louisville, US
★★★★★ 5
Beyond the Usual Left/Right bifurcation
When thinking about Howard Zinn's "A People's History of the United States, I am reminded of E.H. Carr's seminal work "What is History?" whereby he stated: "The belief in a hard core of historical facts existing objectively and independently of the interpretation of the historian is a preposterous fallacy, but one which it is very hard to eradicate". As Carr famously stated, millions of people had crossed the Rubicon, but only Julius Caesar's crossing in 49 BC has been given normative value by historians. For those familiar with the philosophical treatment of historical understanding in Tolstoy's War and Peace, this sentiment will ring true. A People's History is designed to give voice to those millions who passed the rubicon but never found their way into the annuals of history. A couple of points. This book was intended to be a supplement as opposed to a strictly chronological account of history that will give you the bullet points for the most important people, dates and events. [sic] It is not meant to be a replacement for a more standardized textbook. Secondly, Zinn did not hate America, and he in fact stated: "I want young people to understand that ours is a beautiful country, but it has been taken over by men who have no respect for human rights or constitutional liberties. Our people are basically decent and caring, and our highest ideals are expressed in the Declaration of Independence, which was that all of us have an equal right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. The history of our country, I point out in my book, is a striving, against corporate robber barons and war makers, to make those ideals a reality-and all of us, of whatever age, can find immense satisfaction in becoming part of that." Regardless of your political position, between the Great Recession and the Iraq war, there is a relevance to this sentiment that cuts across political lines. Now, what one will notice in the bulk of the one star reviews is the sense that either the reviewer has not read the book, they copied and pasted their criticism from another source or they have strictly given the book one star because it does not conform with their view of reality. "Blame America first", "socialism", "communism", "Marx, "liberal propaganda", you can easily get the gist of the talking points because many American conservatives apparently got the same memo in dismissing anything they don't agree with. The disservice they do to themselves and the sphere of ideas in the outright dismissal of any perspective which does not conform to their own is truly sad. When someone gives a book one star merely for not conforming to their view of reality,they have obviously lost the plot. In university I knew many conservative history professors who liked and used Zinn's work. They believed it was important to incorporate and deal with the claims that Zinn made. You cannot whitewash history and blindly stick by the most comforting narrative. That does not mean that one should agree with Zinn's conclusions or think that he has a monopoly on the truth. Zinn himself would not have wanted that. For those who claim Zinn is a socialist or any other kind of -ist, that he is not completely objective, they have obviously never done any research. Pure positivism was dismissed long ago. Even Max Webber started that our subjective bias comes in the moment we choose to study something, for by seeing the subject matter as valuable, we have placed a normative value on it. There is no pure value objectivity, stating one's position and bias from the outset is what responsible social scientists do these days. A dryly academic text with an obvious bias concealed by a detached form of writing gives a falsely omniscient perspective whose reality is psychological but not objective. However they write, they are just a person, and without expressing their biases it will inevitably turn up in their work without necessarily being obvious. This is far more dangerous than what Zinn does in stating his bias from the outset. So it is a red herring to dismiss Zinn for having a perspective. We all have one and it will come into whatever we do. There is no knowable, objective reality (for humans) living in the Platonic world of perfect forms. History was a puzzle of immeasurable size that was blown apart and the pieces scattered over the cosmos. The vast majority of the pieces are gone, never to return. We are stabbing at an imperfect speculation, not ultimate truth when we engage in historical study. Any physicist will tell you that the particle wave duality of light has pretty much closed the book on the notion that we can objectively, perfectly know anything. This book is important because the poison of partisan politics has come to dominate even the dialogue of academic research. If the sole criterion for giving a book one star is the notion that you don't agree with its thesis, then you obviously live in a fragile world and are incapable of being challenged intellectually. This book is of the upmost importance for the conservative to read and digest. In developing a coherent narrative of the United States, you need to wrestle with its sins and determine, despite our historical shortcomings and transgressions, what is it that makes this imperfect union the pinnacle of nation states if one agrees with that prospect. For the liberal, you should not view Zinn's work as the last word on anything, but rather use it as a stepping stone to further develop your own historical understanding and consider how well has American done on a relative scale in light of the political, societal and human failings that have marred all human civilizations. This book is well worth the challenges it presents, and should be a 5 star treat for the conservative who loves his country and wants to develop the most cogent and nuanced argument as to why that is the case despite those unsettling realities to be found in this book as well as the liberal who wants to give voice to his disaffection with certain aspects of American society and the reasons why we need to change it. This is not another tool in the mindless and poisonous Manichean bifurcation of American politics. It is a vehicle to help you strengthen and deepen your understanding of US history, regardless from which direction you are coming. Recommended to all who are interested in the journey of learning as opposed to a presupposed outcome that serves a vested interest.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 13, 2010
D
Verified Purchase
Dr. Lee D. Carlson
Waukegan, US
★★★★★ 5
A 50 carat learning gem
The teaching of American history in elementary and middle schools reminds one of the cleaning of a commode: any rings or crud are removed and the bowl is disinfected. It then looks shiny and pretty, as if no foul stuffs were ever deposited in it. The tall tales and antiseptic methodologies employed in the teaching of American history in these citadels of bias are finally being countered by some historians, who are also clearly biased but self-consciously so. They do not hesitate to study the foul stuffs that have been part of the history of the United States, and are willing to put up with the strong odors thereof. What results in their writings is a compilation of the facts that are left unreported by the sycophants of established educational hierarchies. The picture they paint is not a pretty one, but for those who desire the bare, naked truth, and not the stale platitudes of whitewashed historical analysis, it can be a grand viewing. The author of this book is one of these new historians, and he does not hesitate to dig deep into the real stories that have remained hidden for decades. Historical analysis of course is more then muckracking, and requires an accounting of what has occurred in the past without blinders. It also must put to rest the notion that historical events are controlled by a ruling elite, and the latter are not the distinguishing features of history. History is not a history of kings, queens, and princesses. They play a role but it is an ancillary one. The title of this book refreshingly reminds us of this. History is governed and directed by the actions of many individuals, known and unknown. The author calls them "the people", and their story is told unabashedly in this book. The author is clearly a socialist, but his attitude is one of a healthy skepticism towards government, and justified distrust of the military establishment. He reminds us that the draft was in place as early as the Revolutionary War, as were the exceptions granted for avoidance of it. For example in Connecticut Yale students and faculty were exempted from the draft, as were ministers and various government officials. There was also the familiar schism between officers and "ordinary" soldiers, and any in the latter class who chose not to respect this distinction were whipped severely. Wealthy individuals dominated the Continental Congress, but most "ordinary" soldiers were not getting paid. Some groups of "ordinary" soldiers rebelled and some executed by firing squad when the rebellion was suppressed (in one case by soldiers of George Washington himself who led the suppression). The author's commentary and documentation on the Revolutionary War certainly act as a counterexample against the belief that this war had universal support and thought of as a noble cause by the general populace of the time. The Revolutionary War, like all other wars, was an ugly, messy affair, and had its share of false patriotism, brutality, and cowardice, and it affected many other peoples that had no interest or stake in it: native American tribes such as the Iroquois and the Mohawk. These tribes did not come under the umbrella of the Declaration of Independence. Some of these tribes therefore launched, with complete justification, a guerilla war against the new American citizenry, especially when the latter decided to push westward and indulge itself in the forced acquisition of land. The author tells us of the smallpox biological warfare launched against the Appalachian tribes by the British, causing a major epidemic. He tell us of the thousands of black slaves who fought with the British in the Revolutionary War, as did the majority of the Indian tribes. He tell us of the keeping of slaves by Thomas Jefferson throughout his life, of the fact that most of the authors of the Constitution were men of wealth, and none were slaves, indentured servants, women, or men without property. He tell us of Shay's rebellion and its counter, the Riot Act, which allowed authorities to keep people in jail without trial, and of the defiance of Anne Hutchinson against the church fathers in the Massachusetts Bay Colony. He tells us of New Jersey's rescinding of women's right to vote in 1807, of a "feminist" movement as early as the 1840's, and of the founding in 1821 of the Troy Female Seminary by Emma Willard. The author reminds us that the war of 1812 was a conflict waged for expansion into Florida, Canada, and Indian territories, that Congress deliberately and without hesitation appropriated money for war against the Seminoles, and that President Van Buren openly bragged to Congress about the forced removal of Cherokees from lands east of the Mississippi. He reminds us of the doctrine of "manifest destiny" and its justification of the brutal war against Mexico waged by President James Polk in the 1840's with the jingoistic assistance of the newspapers (no other course would be rational some of them reported), with Mexico losing half its territory in the 1848 treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo. He reminds us of the Anti-Renter movement in the Hudson valley of New York, and that the Renssalaer family at one time ruled over eighty thousand tenants. He reminds us of Dorr's Rebellion in Rhode Island that attacked the idea, and its perpetrators, that only landowners could vote. So yes, there is much in this book that is fascinating and that is food for a hungry and inquisitive mind. It certainly goes against the mainstream view, and any teacher of history will probably come under fire from those who employ them if they decide to discuss the facts and analysis in this book. The history of the United States has been one of brutality mixed with brilliance, the former of which is emphasized in the pages of this book. A future treatise might emphasize the latter, and together they can give a more accurate picture of what the United States is, what it has been, and its future potential.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 30, 2006
D
Verified Purchase
Davut Habip
Battle Creek, US
★★★★★ 5
An amazing book ...
Format: Paperback
An amazing book. Reading the book helped me understand why the US is experiencing difficulties in "perceived righteousness" today. I would recommend it to anyone who would like to change the World for the better. Howard Zinn is a benevolent hacker: the kind of hacker I would like my children to be, and why not: all children to be. For me, Zinn’s A People’s History of the United States hacks history and defines a problem and offers a solution: 1. The problem: a one-sided patriotic history enslaves the masses, 2. The solution: a bottom-up, humanistic history empowers everyone and opens the doors for future reconciliations among different communities.(1) At this critical juncture of human history both are relevant not only for the US but rather for our race. A one-sided patriotic bias in history: at what cost? 1. hides wrongdoings and the associated guilt, 2. serves as the first line of defense to deflect current & future criticisms for the past & current mistakes, 3. tampers data gathering, silences questioning & divergence of opinions, 4. reduces communication among communities, 5. defines “the patriotic” and increases the chances of populating the armed forces, 6. defines the other: “the unpatriotic,” 7. increases insecurities, 8. evokes fears (of retribution, etc.) 9. can be misused to justify violence against “the other,” 10. builds a common memory for the masses, builds their egos so that these egos can later be exploited, 11. allows the word “culture” to be used as an equivalence: American culture = being American; (2) 12. a politician can mix these facts to incite emotional reactions of the masses and eventually reach a higher number of votes in a predetermined direction, inexpensively, 13. at school, in the media, in speeches of politicians, and during different rituals (starting with reciting the pledge of allegiance and singing of the national anthem) the patriotic history is repeated and reinforced. Under these conditions, the masses learn to repeat what is given to them. They shun away from questioning further. Their concept of free-will is replaced by a misplaced trust. They learn not to deviate from the norm: they are enslaved and are not even aware of this enslavement. Many words lose their meaning: “a more perfect Union” “Justice” “secure the Blessings of Liberty,” “democracy.” A higher degree of cynicism and later a deep feeling of helplessness ensue. There are costs to the individual, the family, the society. Since many worldwide look up to the US morally, the use of one-sided patriotic history in the US produces world leaders who imitate bad examples. Consequently, Humanity pays dearly. A bottom-up, humanistic history empowers everyone: 1. can eliminate ignorance, 2. can eliminate convenient forgetfulness, 3. can eliminate arrogance, 4. improve self-esteem, communication, & understanding 5. can reduce violence, 6. can empower the individuals and the masses: psychologically and economically and thus improve the quality of life, 7. can help the path to sustainable peace. Among the different communities, the wounds are real. A one-sided history often does not address all of these wounds. Denial freezes any possibility of a reconciliation. A reconciliation process would pass through an acceptance of a historical wrong doing. In time, mankind may realize that what Howard Zinn has started may be the building blocks of sustainable peace. As a new year starts, I wish upon all of us: nations, creeds, ethnicities, etc. our very own Howard Zinns. (1) In the US, these communities can be whites, blacks, American Indians, Mexicans, WASPS, Catholics, Jews, Moslems, Chinese, Japanese, etc. In Turkey, where I am from, these communities include the seculars, non-seculars, Alevites, Armenians, Greeks, Jews, Kurds, etc. (2) Most of us are led to believe that “being” American/WASP/Jewish/Moslem/... is a “culture;” we almost always have these attributes thanks to coincidences; i.e. we are born into these “states;” how can a state that is largely a coincidence, be culture? I would suggest that only what is done through our free-will is deemed culture. Interestingly worldwide, the education systems, the media, and politicians use and propagate the word “culture” to imply largely a static state, rather than the result of a willful action.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 24, 2016

recommand products