SKU: 27427544507

Cometic Ford 429/460CI Stock Block 4.500in Bore .098 Thickness MLS-5 Head Gasket

Sale price$158.35 Regular price$175.95
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $43.99 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 16 - Aug 21

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

Cometic Ford 429/460CI Stock Block 4.500in Bore .098 Thickness MLS-5 Head GasketComprised of multiple embossed layers of stainless steel with the outer layers utilizing a Viton rubber coating. Compressed operating thickness is 0. 098". Cometic MLS (Multi Layer Steel) Head Gaskets provide maximum sealing performance for todays high output engines and require no sealants. MLS gaskets are ideal for both aluminum heads to aluminum blocks and aluminum heads to cast iron blocks. They can withstand the shearing force created by the two

Comprised of multiple embossed layers of stainless steel with the outer layers utilizing a Viton rubber coating. Compressed operating thickness is 0.098". Cometic MLS (Multi-Layer Steel) Head Gaskets provide maximum sealing performance for todays high output engines and require no sealants. MLS gaskets are ideal for both aluminum heads to aluminum blocks and aluminum heads to cast iron blocks. They can withstand the shearing force created by the two materials. MLS gaskets have increased strength because they are comprised of multiple layers of stainless steel; which also creates the ability to rebound and resist corrosion. The outer layers are embossed and coated on both sides with Viton (a flour elastomer rubber based material that is heat resistant to 250 C/ 482 F). Viton is designed to meet the demands of a variety of harsh sealing environments, load conditions, and surface finishes. The center or shim layer is uncoated stainless steel, which can be varied to accommodate multiple thickness requirements.

This Part Fits:

Year Make Model Submodel
1969-1974 Ford Country Sedan Base
1969-1974 Ford Country Squire Base
1969-1972 Ford Custom Base
1969-1976 Ford Custom 500 Base
1978 Ford E-100 Econoline Base
1978 Ford E-100 Econoline Chateau
1978 Ford E-100 Econoline Custom
1978 Ford E-100 Econoline Northland
1975-1980 Ford E-250 Econoline Base
1975-1980 Ford E-250 Econoline Chateau
1975-1980 Ford E-250 Econoline Custom
1975-1978 Ford E-250 Econoline Northland
1975-1982,1984-1986 Ford E-250 Econoline Club Wagon Base
1975-1982 Ford E-250 Econoline Club Wagon Chateau
1975-1983,1987-1991 Ford E-250 Econoline Club Wagon Custom
1975-1978 Ford E-250 Econoline Club Wagon Northland
1983-1991 Ford E-250 Econoline Club Wagon XL
1984-1991 Ford E-250 Econoline Club Wagon XLT
1975-1982,1984-1986,1992-1996 Ford E-350 Econoline Base
1975-1982 Ford E-350 Econoline Chateau
1975-1983,1987-1991 Ford E-350 Econoline Custom
1975-1978 Ford E-350 Econoline Northland
1983-1996 Ford E-350 Econoline XL
1977-1982,1984-1986 Ford E-350 Econoline Club Wagon Base
1977-1982,1992-1996 Ford E-350 Econoline Club Wagon Chateau
1992-1996 Ford E-350 Econoline Club Wagon Chateau HD
1977-1983,1987-1996 Ford E-350 Econoline Club Wagon Custom
1992-1993 Ford E-350 Econoline Club Wagon Custom HD
1977-1978 Ford E-350 Econoline Club Wagon Northland
1983-1991 Ford E-350 Econoline Club Wagon XL
1994-1996 Ford E-350 Econoline Club Wagon XL HD
1984-1989,1991-1996 Ford E-350 Econoline Club Wagon XLT
1992-1996 Ford E-350 Econoline Club Wagon XLT HD
1975-1976 Ford Elite Base
1973-1974 Ford F-100 Base
1976-1978 Ford F-150 Base
1975-1979 Ford F-150 Custom
1975-1978 Ford F-150 Northland
1975-1979 Ford F-150 Ranger
1978-1979 Ford F-150 Ranger Lariat
1975-1979 Ford F-150 Ranger XLT
1977 Ford F-150 XLT
1973-1974,1976-1978,1983-1986 Ford F-250 Base
1975-1979,1987-1992 Ford F-250 Custom
1995-1996 Ford F-250 Eddie Bauer
1975-1978 Ford F-250 Northland
1975-1979 Ford F-250 Ranger
1978-1979 Ford F-250 Ranger Lariat
1975-1979 Ford F-250 Ranger XLT
1995-1996 Ford F-250 Special
1983-1996 Ford F-250 XL
1983 Ford F-250 XLS
1977,1983-1984,1993-1996 Ford F-250 XLT
1985-1992 Ford F-250 XLT Lariat
1997 Ford F-250 HD XL
1997 Ford F-250 HD XLT
1973-1974,1976-1978,1983-1986,1997 Ford F-350 Base
1975-1979,1987-1992 Ford F-350 Custom
1995 Ford F-350 Eddie Bauer
1975-1978 Ford F-350 Northland
1975-1979 Ford F-350 Ranger
1978-1979 Ford F-350 Ranger Lariat
1975-1979 Ford F-350 Ranger XLT
1995-1996 Ford F-350 Special
1983-1997 Ford F-350 XL
1983 Ford F-350 XLS
1977,1983-1984,1993-1997 Ford F-350 XLT
1985-1992 Ford F-350 XLT Lariat
1970 Ford Fairlane 500
1970 Ford Falcon Base
1970 Ford Falcon Futura
1969-1974 Ford Galaxie 500 Base
1969-1970 Ford Galaxie 500 XL
1972-1976 Ford Gran Torino Base
1974-1976 Ford Gran Torino Brougham
1974-1975 Ford Gran Torino Elite
1972-1975 Ford Gran Torino Sport
1972-1976 Ford Gran Torino Squire
1969-1978 Ford LTD Base
1970-1976 Ford LTD Brougham
1975-1978 Ford LTD Country Squire
1975-1978 Ford LTD Landau
1970-1971 Ford Mustang Base
1970 Ford Mustang Boss 429
1970-1971 Ford Mustang Grande
1970-1971 Ford Mustang Mach 1
1970 Ford Mustang Shelby GT-500
1969-1974 Ford Ranch Wagon Base
1970 Ford Ranch Wagon Police Cruiser
1970-1977 Ford Ranchero 500
1970-1971 Ford Ranchero Base
1970-1977 Ford Ranchero GT
1970-1976 Ford Ranchero Squire
1968-1976 Ford Thunderbird Base
1971 Ford Torino 500
1970-1976 Ford Torino Base
1970-1971 Ford Torino Brougham
1970-1971 Ford Torino Cobra
1970-1971 Ford Torino GT
1970-1971 Ford Torino Squire
1970-1971 Ford Torino Super Cobra Jet
1968-1978 Lincoln Continental Base
1968-1971 Lincoln Mark III Base
1972-1976 Lincoln Mark IV Base
1977-1978 Lincoln Mark V Base
1969-1974 Mercury Colony Park Base
1970-1971,1973 Mercury Cougar Base
1970 Mercury Cougar Cobra Jet
1970-1971,1973-1976 Mercury Cougar XR-7
1969-1971 Mercury Cyclone Base
1969 Mercury Cyclone CJ
1970-1971 Mercury Cyclone GT
1969-1971 Mercury Cyclone Spoiler
1975-1978 Mercury Grand Marquis Base
1969-1970 Mercury Marauder Base
1969-1970 Mercury Marauder X-100
1969-1978 Mercury Marquis Base
1969-1978 Mercury Marquis Brougham
1975-1976 Mercury Marquis Colony Park
1970-1974,1976 Mercury Montego Base
1975 Mercury Montego Brougham
1972-1973 Mercury Montego GT
1970-1976 Mercury Montego MX
1970-1974,1976 Mercury Montego MX Brougham
1976 Mercury Montego MX Villager
1970-1975 Mercury Montego Villager
1969-1974 Mercury Monterey Base
1969-1974 Mercury Monterey Custom
Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 27427544507

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.8 ★★★★★
Based on 13 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
H
Verified Purchase
Hunter Blauvelt
Lexington, US
★★★★★ 4
Great portable second screen
Size: 15.6" 1080P
Really convenient for a second screen on the go. The display looks sharp and it’s lightweight enough to carry around easily. Setup is simple, just plug and play. Not super bright, but works well for most uses.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 10, 2026
M
Verified Purchase
Michelle
New York, US
★★★★★ 5
Exceptional - Better than one twice the price
Size: 15.6" 1080P
I bought a different external monitor a few years ago for twice the price and it was abominable compared to this monitor. This monitor is absolutely perfect. The speakers are definitely tinny like others mentioned, so don't expect to DJ a party with this thing, but for work it's perfect since that means voices are clearer anyways. The sound just isn't as full/rounded with proper bass, but it doesn't even matter because there's also a headphone jack on the monitor, too. USB-C is a total game changer for powering and passing full audio-visual in a single port. The included cables are also a big win since getting a spare data USB-C cable can get pricey and I know the one included is guaranteed to work with this monitor. It was literally plug-and-play with my 2023 16" Macbook Pro. I could go on and on about how every detail of this monitor is perfect, like how the stand is also a screen protector cover and how light and easy it is to carry and how the little grippy feet hold it in place confidently, but my point is THIS is FINALLY the external monitor I've been looking for!!!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 26, 2026
B
Verified Purchase
Brian
Grantham, US
★★★★★ 5
Great portable display for the price.
Size: 15.6" 1080P
This monitor works very well. I bought because I needed an extra monitor for my iPad on my work desk. But I don’t have an outlet at this desk. The iPad powers the monitor just fine, though it drains the battery pretty quickly. I ended up also buying a 20ft USB-C cable and running that to the nearest outlet to power the monitor and my iPad. I also have a little phone holder standing the display up. The quality is pretty good for the price point. Definitely not my highest quality screen. It's perfect for spreadsheets and the colors are very passable anyway.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 21, 2026
A
Verified Purchase
Andrea Elizondo
Louisville, US
★★★★★ 5
Really good.
Size: 15.6" 1080P
Perfect size. Love the cover that comes with it. Easy storage and portability. Perfect to work on the move. The screen itself looks really good for the price. I connected with the type c and turn on and off as my computer does. Amazing and easy to connect. Doesn't flickers.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 2, 2026
D
Verified Purchase
D. Christensen
Pawtucket, US
★★★★★ 4
Overall great value, for the stated purpose of being a portable monitor
Size: 15.6" 1080P
This is a review of two monitors: MNN Portable Monitor 15.6inch FHD 1080P (no model number listed) M156F01 is marked on the box Arzopa Portable Monitor, 15.6'' 1080P model number: “S1 Table” I ordered the Arzopa monitor first, as kind of an impulse buy. I was going to be traveling and wanted to take my mini Ryzen 9 PC with me, but it had no monitor. I found the Arzopa monitor had good reviews and the price was right so I ordered. Then later I discovered it was a MATTE panel. I’m not sure how I missed that earlier, but I would NOT have ordered it if I knew that it was matte. Matte finishes on monitors are supposed to be easier on eyes as the matte surface supposedly reduces glare. But in my experience, there is a problem with this feature. First, any monitor positioned properly should never have a problem with glare. For example, you don’t position a monitor facing a large window or another source of strong light. If your monitor is positioned correctly, glare should not be a possible problem to be solved. Second, the matte finish on most monitors I have seen tends to greatly distort the picture quality. Imagine you are standing outside at noon, but the area you are in is foggy. The view you have of your surroundings (through a light fog) is similar to the picture quality of any matte finish monitor. At least, in my experience. I was sitting in front of my two large (not portable) monitors, thinking about the mistake I made in ordering a matte finish portable monitor. And I realized…I was so used to using dual monitors that I would really want two monitors for travel, also. I read some reviews of the MNN monitor and someone described it as a GLOSSY panel. Perfect. I decided to order the MNN to use as my “primary” travel monitor with the Arzopa to be used as my “second” monitor for a dual monitor setup while traveling. That led to mistake number 2. They are both matte finish. When I realized this, they had both shipped. And they were delivered very quickly , both arriving on the same day. I decided to give these monitors a try, and I’m glad I did. While they are both described officially as “matte”, the picture qualify is closer to what I would expect from a true “glossy” surface computer monitor. And they both have much more than acceptable image quality. So to compare them: FEATURES: Their features are identical other than their physical controls. For adjusting these monitors, there is a difference between them, and I PREFER one over the other, as far as controls go. Arzopa has multi-function push buttons on the left to adjust settings like brightness/contrast. MNN has push-buttons and a teeny tiny joystick on the right to adjust settings like brightness/contrast. I think this is an odd design decision for a -portable- monitor. The Arzopa controls are both more intuitive and (I believe) probably more sturdy / more likely to be reliable over time. We’ll see if the tiny joystick of the MNN survives a few trips bouncing around in my checked bags. DISPLAY QUALITY I was very pleasantly surprised by the image quality of both of these monitors. I would rate them both a solid 9/10 on image quality. I’ve seen better, but only with OLED panels. Between the two if I had to pick a winner for image quality it would be the MNN. But the difference is so slight. I think they both deserve a “9”. While I can tell they are both matte (and I do not like that) the matte finish of these monitors is not as “foggy” as most matte monitors. It’s not matte enough to detract from the overall image quality, which is great. The factory settings of both monitors had the brightness (black lefel) set too high. Brightness is what controls how “black” black items will appear. If the Brightness is set too high, then something which should be color black will appear to be gray or (worse) even light gray. After I turned down the brightness a bit on both monitors, the black level of both was very satisfying. Speakers: I would never try to use speakers on a portable monitor, so I can’t comment on this. I don’t think the Arzopa even has speakers, but it doesn’t matter, as I would not use those. STAND: They have virtually identical magnetically attached pleather stands that can be used to support the monitors in vertical or horizontal orientation. The magnets on both are pretty weak. However, it should be adequate for use on a solid desk or table. You might not be happy on an airplane if you hit turbulence at all. Summary and suggestion for improvement: I would give both of these a 4-star rating on the Amazon scale. To earn a 5-star rating I would suggest: 1) Replace the magnetic stand with something that attaches to the monitor more firmly. 2) Include a USB-C cable with a right-angle connector on one end. For dual monitor use, these both have cables sticking out the left side. If you want to set them side by side, you need to keep them about 2” apart, because the cables interfere with setting them close together, like you want to. The most obvious solution would be a right-angle USB-C cable. I have ordered one. But it would cost nothing for Arzopa and MNN to include this. 3) Make the above changes without increasing the price. If you could do that, I would rate these monitors a solid 5/5. There are better monitors for sale. But for the stated purpose and price? These are close to what I would want. Very close. FINAL THOUGHT: (Which One Should I Buy?) There are many portable monitors available with plenty of options in the same relative price range. The two I am reviewing here are a couple of the most highly rated. If you are trying to choose between these two specific monitors, I would recommend you buy the Arzopa. While the MNN has slightly better image quality, they both have really good image quality. I think the design of the Arzopa is just a bit more appropriate for the stated purpose of being portable. If you are leaning toward the MNN however, I would not discourage you from buying it. If you’ve narrowed down your decision to these two specific monitors, I don’t think you can possibly choose “wrong” if you buy only one of them. They both exceeded my expectations.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 16, 2025

recommand products