SKU: 75359888450

MWC 24 Jewel 1982 Pattern 300m Automatic Military Divers Watch with Sapphire Crystal on a NATO Webbing Strap (With Date)

$5632.65 $6258.50
Save 10%
No.2 Bestseller on lamcf.fr >

Pay in installments of $1564.62 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 13 - Aug 18

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

MWC 24 Jewel 1982 Pattern 300m Automatic Military Divers Watch with Sapphire Crystal on a NATO Webbing Strap (With Date)SKU Code: SUB MIL SS AU W These diver's watches are a modern remake of our 1980s model, specifically crafted for a U. S. contractor who secured a large sale to one of their clients. The watch features a robust stainless steel case and is equipped with a high performance automatic 24 jewel self winding movement. Several upgrades have been made to the original design, including a shatter and scratch resistant sapphire crystal and an increased water

SKU Code: SUB/MIL/SS/AU/W

These diver's watches are a modern remake of our 1980s model, specifically crafted for a U.S. contractor who secured a large sale to one of their clients. The watch features a robust stainless steel case and is equipped with a high-performance automatic 24-jewel self-winding movement. Several upgrades have been made to the original design, including a shatter and scratch-resistant sapphire crystal and an increased water resistance rating. The dial is unbranded (referred to in the military as sterile), giving the watch a very clean and uncluttered appearance.

Historical and Technical Background

Inspired by the 1980 UK MOD specification for automatic diver's watches (DEF STAN 66-4 [Part 1] Issue 3), this model retains key design elements such as the unidirectional bezel and boldly marked dial with tritium paint. The original MOD specification also called for a mineral glass crystal, as documented in the MOD file shown in the final two images. While staying true to the spirit of the original, this updated version incorporates modern improvements, such as the use of non-radioactive paint and the inclusion of sapphire crystal, as detailed below.

Key Features and Upgrades

  • Movement: High-performance automatic 24-jewel NH35A self-winding movement with a 41-hour reserve
  • Crystal: Shatter and scratch-resistant sapphire crystal with anti-reflective coating
  • Water Resistance: 300m / 1000ft
  • Design: Sterile dial for a clean, uncluttered appearance
  • Visibility: Uses Luminova for excellent nighttime visibility
  • Strap: Supplied with 2 x 20mm NATO webbing straps for versatility and customization

Specifications

  • Water Resistance: 300m / 1000ft
  • Crown: Screwdown locking
  • Caseback: Screw caseback
  • Dimensions:
    • Width: 45mm including the crown, 40mm excluding the crown
    • Thickness: 15mm
    • Crystal Diameter: 31mm
    • Lug to Lug: 49mm
  • Weight: 89.5g
  • Movement: 24-jewel NH35A with a 41-hour reserve
  • Strap: 2 x 20mm NATO webbing straps
  • Packaging: Giftbox included

Benefits of Sapphire Crystal

Many customers ask about the benefits of sapphire crystal over standard mineral crystal. Synthetic sapphire is extremely strong, shatter-resistant, and scratch-resistant, making it ideal for military and security personnel, police officers, and active outdoor enthusiasts. These groups account for over 70% of our customer base.

Our observations show that over 90% of incidents involving cracked watch crystals occur with mineral glass. Even hardened mineral crystals do not match the durability of sapphire. Sapphire crystals are strengthened through a heat treatment process that removes internal stresses and are then coated with two layers of anti-reflective coating. While sapphire crystals are more expensive, they offer superior longevity, resilience, and performance, justifying their use in higher-end watches.

These models represent excellent value and are competitively priced for such a high-performance automatic watch. This watch combines the historical design and functional integrity of its predecessors with modern upgrades to meet the needs of today's professionals and enthusiasts.

    Shipping Notes
    • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
    • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
    • Delivery to the USA:
    1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
    • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
    Exchange/Return Notes
    • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
    • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
    • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
    • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
    SKU: 75359888450

    Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

    Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

    4.8 ★★★★★
    Based on 23 reviews
    Sort
    Highest Rating
    Newest First
    Oldest First
    Product Reviews
    S
    Verified Purchase
    slimwriter
    New York, US
    ★★★★★ 2
    Not sour
    Not really sour at all so it’s a pretty disappointing candy.
    WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
    Reviewed in the United States on May 6, 2026
    M
    Verified Purchase
    Moon Riley
    Dallas, US
    ★★★★★ 5
    Sugar free
    Tastes great
    WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
    Reviewed in the United States on April 21, 2026
    M
    Verified Purchase
    Mr. Paul A. Ackermann
    Carnegie, US
    ★★★★★ 5
    Dude, it's not just a horror novel
    Format: Paperback
    This is to the previous reviewer (C. Scanlan). If this is just a horror novel, it failed miserably. It is not exactly a blood ’n gore thriller. Compared to Stephen King, it is pretty tame. What puts the horror in this book is that it is social commentary. Mary Shelly is not just trying to scare us. It is more than just a “Friday the 13th” movie. Mary Shelly is delivering a message. It seems that everyone understands this except this reviewer. There have been several different interpretations of the novel (see [...] for 10 different meanings of the novel). ICE takes the interpretation that Shelly is saying science can go too far. This is a perfectly valid interpretation. One can disagree with this interpretation but let’s not resort to name calling and personal attacks – that those who hold such an interpretation are doing a “low level attempt to cash in on home schooling Christian paranoia and fear of health care” or believe that “AIDS [is] the fruit of sin”. My wife and I are Catholic parents and we sent our children to public schools He mocks the idea of a secular fundamentalist but then demonstrates what that is. A religious fundamentalist sees anyone who disagrees with him as being of the devil. A secular fundamentalist sees anyone who disagrees with him as guilty of “brainwashing” others. In both cases, true dialogue is impossible. Another thing that a fundamentalist does is that he sees things in opposite extremes. If you are warning of the dangers of trusting too much in science then you must be against science. There is no middle ground for the fundamentalist. If you see that science can sometimes go too far then that means you are against health care. But this is a non-sequitur. Nielson writes “Frankenstein’s placing of the creation of life within the scientific method first destroys the unrepeatability and systematically eliminates the other elements [of hope, love, beauty, creativity and sacrifice]”. Nielson is not criticizing the scientific method in total. He is only criticizing it in the creation of life. The reviewer writes “He thereby easily and explicitly condemns the whole process and philosophy of the scientific method”. But Nielson is not condemning the whole process of the scientific method. He is only condemning it in the creation of life. The reviewer then mocks the credentials of the critics in the book - “So who are these essayists superior to Norton's and Oxfords and free of deconstructionist feminist secular fundamentalism, experts so august Ignatius should want them mentioned on their product page yet are nowhere to be seen?” But this game can be played both ways. What are the credentials of this reviewer? Is this reviewer so august as to challenge these essayists? Again, this is merely an ad-hominem attack. I really do not care who has the best credentials. What matters is who makes sense. Sometimes intellectuals can make the dumbest claims. Read Paul Johnson’s book, “Intellectuals” (http://www.amazon.com/Intellectuals-Marx-Tolstoy-Sartre-Chomsky/dp/0061253170/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1421862888&sr=8-1&keywords=intellectuals). He compares the essayists unfavorably to “good solid Roman Catholic moral theology” from the likes of Richard A. McCormick S.J., who “is the renowned leader of Roman Catholic Moral Theology in the field of bioethics in the USA.” He overlooks the fact that A. McCormick S.J. has dissented from teachings of the Popes Paul VI, John Paul II, and Benedict XVI over contraception. The “renowned leader” in the Catholic Church in morality is first and foremost the pope. Since Richard A. McCormick has contradicted the popes, he cannot be a good solid Catholic theologian. Mary Shelly lived right after the Enlightenment – man is the measure of all things. She lived at a time when people believed that science will solve all our problems. This is called scientism. ICE contends that Shelly is saying that we may be expecting too much from science. It does not mean that Shelly was saying that we should reject science. And it does not mean that Shelly believes that we should go back to the Catholic faith. In fact, ICE acknowledges that Shelly was an anti-Catholic. But the Church believes that the kernel of truth can be found in others, even in anti-Catholics. This is part of the Catholic tradition. St Augustine learned from Plato and St Aquinas learned from Aristotle. ICE would take that kernel of truth and expound that with the fullness of the Catholic faith. You may disagree with the Catholic faith, or with ICE looking at Shelly’s book from a Catholic perspective. But this is at least as a legitimate an interpretation as any other. In fact, this interpretation seems closer to the truth than the others. This interpretation is the traditional interpretation, which means that it goes back further to Shelly’s time than the modern interpretations, and is therefore less likely to be in error. BTW, the reviewer wrote that “Opus Dei right wing publishing (or reprint) house is selling this novel is to milk the home school market and to support its own bizarre bio-ethical ideology”. This is factually wrong. The company that publishes Opus Dei’s books is Sceptre. But the publisher of ICE is Ignatius Press.
    WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
    Reviewed in the United States on January 22, 2015
    R
    Verified Purchase
    RC Mom
    Lake Worth, US
    ★★★★★ 5
    Good experience
    Format: Paperback
    It was all good.
    WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
    Reviewed in the United States on November 24, 2025
    B
    Verified Purchase
    Brian J. Buckley
    Battle Creek, US
    ★★★★★ 4
    Love the Edition and Footnotes; Don't need the Cultural Criticisms
    Format: Paperback
    The layout of the book and the footnotes are each great. What mars the book, unfortunately, is the editor's need to make simplistic statements about cultural elements. Several times, for example, he addresses "feminism," even using the term "Franken-feminists" in a puerile manner at one point. As too many of these conservative Catholics do, he simplifies and comments about modern culture without nuance. In this case, it is simply unprofessional and inaccurate (i) to not capture the myriad differences in feminist thought (many of which he and his readers would accept) and (ii) thereby to make all feminists the same (e.g,, assuming the feminists of the 1970's are the same as today's.) This is all unfortunate because when he is just addressing the literary elements of the book, his comments are wonderful and helpful to the reader. Any reader should know that this presentation will be tilted in an unsophisticated and simplistic way toward a traditional Catholic view (a view that can indeed be defended well while still being careful and charitable to critics). With that caveat, he (or she) should still buy it and garner a good edition of the text.
    WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
    Reviewed in the United States on March 12, 2024

    recommand products

    SNA Haridraakhandam
    150.00
    Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals 1-Testosterone
    59.99
    Professor Nutz Peanut Butter
    17.49
    ProdjectAD Shredabull Untamed 2.0
    49.99
    Black Floor Mats for Range Rover Evoque (2020-2024) P300e Plug-in Hybrid
    296.00