SKU: 98563846387

24”x36” Gridded one side self-Healing Rotary Mat, Grey

$109.88 $122.09
Save 10%
No.2 Bestseller on lamcf.fr >

Pay in installments of $30.52 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Oct 2 - Oct 7

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

24”x36” Gridded one side self-Healing Rotary Mat, GreyDouble sided Self healing Triple Layer heat welded design Helps to extend the life of your rotary blades The OLFA RM MG 01 GRY 24" x 36" Gray Double Sided Rotary Mat is a versatile and durable cutting mat designed to deliver clean and precise cuts. The mat measures 24" x 36" and has a thickness of 1. 5mm. This large size provides ample workspace for various craft projects. The mat is double sided, offering versatility in its use. One side features a

  • Double-sided
  • Self-healing
  • Triple Layer heat welded design
  • Helps to extend the life of your rotary blades

The OLFA RM-MG-01/GRY 24" x 36" Gray Double-Sided Rotary Mat is a versatile and durable cutting mat designed to deliver clean and precise cuts. The mat measures 24" x 36" and has a thickness of 1.5mm. This large size provides ample workspace for various craft projects.

The mat is double-sided, offering versatility in its use. One side features a solid gray color, which is suitable for general crafting purposes. The other side has grid lines marked in inches, allowing for detailed cutting.

The self-healing feature of the mat ensures that the surface cuts automatically reseal, providing a continually smooth cutting surface. This feature enhances the mat's durability and extends its longevity.

The OLFA RM-MG-01/GRY mat is built to withstand the demands of daily use in the most demanding craft projects. Its 1.5mm thickness provides stability and durability for a wide range of crafting applications.

The OLFA RM-MG-01/GRY 24" x 36" Gray Double-Sided Rotary Mat is a high-quality cutting mat designed for clean and precise cuts. Its self-healing finish, double-sided design, and compatibility with OLFA rotary tools make it an essential tool in the crafting process. Whether you're working on general projects or require detailed cutting, this sturdy mat will provide a reliable and smooth cutting surface.

This double-sided mat is an essential component of the OLFA cutting system and is meant to be used in conjunction with rotary cutters. It is designed to work seamlessly with OLFA rotary tools to deliver optimal cutting performance.

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 98563846387

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.2 ★★★★★
Based on 28 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
X
Verified Purchase
xiwaeo
Whiting, US
★★★★★ 5
Great Read
Great book, I enjoyed reading it. I am non-lawyer so I spent time having to read and re-read sentences and paragraphs but darn good book. Highly recommend it. Sometimes a person can be in discussion with an official, doctor, lawyer, cop ..whatever--it helps to remember arguments made in this book. Most folks just try to explain a situation, heaven forbid standing in front of a court or judge in a legal matter. But, this type of reading builds confidence, a strong vocabulary and so forth. It matters most trying to persuade a person or an institution..just winning, making your point in a clear coherent and cognizant way. This book can teach you these things.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 20, 2025
J
Verified Purchase
Jeff Wade
Omaha, US
★★★★★ 4
You don't have to like Justice Scalia to like his book.
Perhaps an appellate brief that you wrote would have been perfect if only the judge had read it. The lesson you learned, hopefully, was that there is no guarantee that a judge will read your brief. The lesson you can learn from "Making Your Case" is how to write so that the judges will read what you wrote - preferably before your oral argument. Writing in a quite candid, lucid and entertaining style, Scalia and Garner serve up tips that even the most experienced lawyers can learn from. If you find yourself approaching the court's word limit, for example, you may be minimizing the chances of having your brief read, as judges really do favor brevity. How do you write for a court that is notoriously dismissive of higher court precedents? How do you best respond to a judge who asks whether you would be content with a remand? These and other critical questions are addressed simply yet insightfully. If your legal education stressed the IRAC approach (Issue, Rule, Application, Conclusion), Scalia and Garner take you a step further by stressing a syllogistic approach. Even if you have already been exposed to all the best ideas about persuading appellate judges, you are still likely to gain much rom reading "Making Your Case" because the authors organize all those ideas in a way that makes them much easier to remember and keep them in mind as you prepare your written and oral arguments. Justice Scalia calls his approach to legal reasoning and argument "textualism," which I understand to mean that his decisions are driven by the language of the law and of the case. My impression from reading many of his decisions is that he is often driven by ideology, so I can't quite square his book with his decisions. I also question the book's fundamental statement that the overriding objective of a brief is to make the court's job easier, as I prefer to write primarily for the purpose of winning the case. My criticisms of "Making Your Case" are miniscule compared to those thrown at it by Richard Posner. But although I find Judge Posner's decisions generally more fair than those of Justice Scalia, I prefer the clarity of Justice Scalia's writing - especially when he teams up with Bryan Garmer. Judge Posner notwithstanding, Scalia and Garner have put together a gem that is likely to prove invaluable for law students as well as for trial and appellate lawyers who are still interested in improving their game. If you fall into either category, buy this book, read it two or three times, and then keep it handy as a reference. It should help you make your case.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 18, 2012
F
Verified Purchase
Fig&Friday
Dallas, US
★★★★★ 5
A Great Read... (for those in the legal field)
A great gift for those in the legal field. We ordered several for gifts throughout the year.. Made a great little gift basket with a bottle of whiskey :)
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 20, 2026
R
Verified Purchase
rbnn
Houston, US
★★★★★ 5
Elegant, useful
Simply the best book on legal persuasive writing ever written. Interesting, useful, fun, full of great anecdotes. Terrific discussion of statutory interpretation. Great references to scholarly classical treatises on rhetoric. This book is wonderful both for its analysis of oral argument and for its discussion of written forms of persuasion, like briefs. I wish I had had it earlier. My only complaint is the same one I have with virtually all modern style manuals: they advocate a simplistic prose style, characterized by short, conversational sentences, avoiding unusual words, eschewing Latin phrases. But I personally often find prose that breaks these rules a refreshing change. I enjoy reading a word or phrase I rarely see but that is perfectly chosen. And I enjoy learning new words or phrases. This book would condemn two of the greatest legal prose stylists out there: John Marshall and Learned Hand, both of whose opinions often contained sentences that would not work so well conversationally, that were full of long, convoluted sentences and classical allusions. My sense is that in this joint work Justice Scalia, who can write rich and interesting prose, pushed back against some of the simplifying strictures of his co-author. Furthermore, I think that often too much emphasis on simple words and sentences serves to make more complex ideas too difficult to express or to understand. Thus, the book (like most books) argues against "jargon," but jargon, once learned, is often a much clearer way of expressing something than a rephrasing. And the Roe v. Wade anecdote is great! It explains a lot... In any case, I am hardly qualified to criticize Justice Scalia, whose writing is far beyond my own. Anyway, this is a great book.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 7, 2008
W
Verified Purchase
WANDA LEE CATALAN
Battle Creek, US
★★★★★ 5
Recomendado para todo estudiante de Derecho
Libro fácil de leer y fácil de comprender. Recomendado
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 2, 2026

recommand products

Kew Single RJ45 Socket - Antique Brass | White
43.93
BBO Aces Pro Tournament Poker Table
749.50
Whynter 124 Bottle Freestanding Wine Cabinet Refrigerator
1047.49
Plaid Star Patch Back Washed Shirt - Sage Green PREORDER
69.90
Richmond Medium Wall Light Fine Porcelain - Antique Brass
102.91